MC Oran vs ASO Chlef: match statistics
MC Oran vs ASO Chlef: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
MC Oran played ASO Chlef in Ligue 1 (Algeria). The match was played on 7 May 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
MC Oran: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. ASO Chlef: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
MC Oran scores 1.19 and concedes 0.96 goals per match. ASO Chlef scores 0.93 and concedes 0.96. League average: 2.22 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: MC Oran 48%, ASO Chlef 44%. Over 2.5: MC Oran 41%, ASO Chlef 33%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
MC Oran has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.26. MC Oran: 10.3 shots per match, ASO Chlef: 9.7.
Match halves
MC Oran: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.89. ASO Chlef: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.56.
Goals by minute
MC Oran: 46-60 (9 goals). ASO Chlef: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligue 1: 2.22 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
MC Oran is the clear favorite: they sit 3rd in the table and record a 62% win rate at home, while ASO Chlef are 9th with only a 15% away win rate. The hosts score an average of 1.38 goals per home match (32 goals this season) and have a higher xG — 1.52 versus ASO Chlef’s 1.01; additionally MC Oran averages 11.69 shots per match (5.23 on target) compared to the visitors’ 8.25 (3.08 on target). Defensively the hosts concede just 0.62 goals per home match, while ASO Chlef concede 1.23 on the road; home clean sheet rate is 38% versus 23% for the visitors, and the xG conceded differential (1.01 vs 1.58) confirms Chlef’s weaker away defense. Form backs the advantage — MC Oran have won 4 of their last 5 matches (7 goals in those games) and average 2.4 points in that period, while ASO Chlef have won 3 of 5 (6 goals, 1.8 points per match). Given the clear edge in xG, shot volume and lower average goals conceded at home, I assign MC Oran roughly a 70% chance to win, a 20% probability of a draw and 10% for an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
ASO Chlef has a seasonal BTTS rate of 62% and 60% in the last 5 matches, averaging 0.92 goals per game (xG 1.01), indicating visitors regularly find the net. MC Oran at home has a seasonal BTTS of only 29% and 50% clean sheets, conceding on average 0.71 goals per game, which strongly limits the chances of Goal/Goal. In the last 5 matches hosts recorded BTTS in 40% of games and conceded on average 1.0 goal, while visitors also conceded on average 1.0 goal, which partially aligns their defensive form. xG numbers are similar — MC Oran has xG for 1.48, and ASO Chlef allows xG 1.58, with actual seasonal goals of 0.93 and 0.92 respectively — there is no clear offensive signal supporting BTTS. Considering the hosts' high 50% clean sheets and the league clean sheet rate of 61%, I favor the 'No Goal' scenario (60%) over 'BTTS - Yes' (40%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model projects a total of 2.68 xG for the match: MC Oran 1.53 xG and ASO Chlef 1.15 xG, suggesting a higher probability of exceeding the 1.5-goal mark. In their last 5 matches MC Oran averaged 1.4 goals, ASO Chlef 1.2 (2.6 combined), and in those runs the percentage of matches over 2.5 goals was 60% for both teams. Season-long indicators are mixed: MC Oran have 21% of matches over 2.5, ASO Chlef 46%, while Over 1.5 occurred in the season in 50% and 62% of cases respectively. With a mean of 2.68 and a Poisson distribution the probability of over 1.5 is roughly 75%, over 2.5 about 50% (accounting for recent form I apply a small uplift to 52% for Over 2.5), and 4+ goals only around 28%. Additionally MC Oran have 50% clean sheets this season versus 23% for ASO Chlef, which reduces the risk of a goalless game, however the home side’s xG advantage and higher number of shots on target (5.36 vs 3.08) favor the Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is a draw at half-time followed by a home win (X/1): hosts were level at the break in 29% of matches and ASO Chlef in 54%, yielding an average of about a 42% chance of a half-time draw. Despite the tie at half-time the hosts remain favorites for the full-time result — they have a 50% win rate this season and 1.64 points per home match compared to the visitors' 15% win rate and 0.85 points per away match; their attacking xG is 1.48 versus the visitors' 1.01, suggesting higher quality chances created. Additional support comes from an advantage in shots on target (5.36 vs 3.08) and a greater number of clean sheets for the hosts (clean sheets in 50% of matches vs 23% for the visitors), while in the last five matches the hosts scored on average 1.2 goals in second halves compared to 0.6 for their opponents, indicating an ability to decide the game after the break. Therefore the most likely HT/FT scenario is X/1 (28%), followed by 1/1 (25%) — combined about a 58% chance of a home win; an ASO Chlef win is assessed at roughly 16%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| MC Oran | ASO Chlef | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
MC Oran is 33% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - MC Oran · 1.8 pts / match - ASO Chlef
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
MC Oran is 28% better for: goals scored per match.
1.19 goals / match - MC Oran · 0.93 goals / match - ASO Chlef
MC Oran scores in 67% of matches (18 of 27 matches), while ASO Chlef keeps a clean sheet in 37% (10 of 27 matches).
ASO Chlef scores in 74% of matches (20 of 27 matches), while MC Oran keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - MC Oran
Over / Under - ASO Chlef
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
ASO Chlef is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.96 pts / match - MC Oran · 1.07 pts / match - ASO Chlef
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
MC Oran - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
ASO Chlef - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
MC Oran
ASO Chlef
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 1).
Teams vs league
| MC Oran | Liga | ASO Chlef | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.15 | 2.22 | ▼ 1.89 |
| Both teams scored | • 48% | 47% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 41% | 38% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | • 30% | 30% | ▲ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 59% | 63% | ▲ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 78% | 72% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: MC Oran 0 - 0 - 1 ASO Chlef. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of MC Oran vs ASO Chlef?
The Ligue 1 match finished MC Oran 1:0 ASO Chlef. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before MC Oran vs ASO Chlef?
MC Oran score 1.19 goals per game on average and ASO Chlef 0.93. The Ligue 1 average is 2.22 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 48% of MC Oran's matches and 44% of ASO Chlef's.
What form are MC Oran and ASO Chlef in?
Over the last 5 games MC Oran have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and ASO Chlef 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MC Oran vs ASO Chlef?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for MC Oran vs ASO Chlef: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


