MEAP Nisou vs PAEEK: match statistics
PAEEK appear to be the favorites for this match, occupying 2nd place in the table compared to MEAP Nisou's 7th position. The hosts are in very poor home form with just a 25% win rate at home and a negative goal difference of -13, conceding an average of 2.08 goals per game. PAEEK demonstrate much better away performance, with a 33% win rate, better efficiency (15% shot conversion vs the hosts' 10%), and higher possession (57% vs 49%). The visitors also have a solid away defense with 42% clean sheets and averaging only 1.17 goals conceded per match. Despite both teams' average recent form (1.4 PPG for the hosts, 1.0 PPG for the visitors), the overall season statistics clearly favor PAEEK, making an away win the most likely outcome.
MEAP Nisou vs PAEEK: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
MEAP Nisou played PAEEK in Second Division (Cyprus). The match was played on 18 March 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
MEAP Nisou: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. PAEEK: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
MEAP Nisou scores 1.08 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. PAEEK scores 1.42 and concedes 0.88. League average: 2.61 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: MEAP Nisou 46%, PAEEK 46%. Over 2.5: MEAP Nisou 46%, PAEEK 46%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
MEAP Nisou has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.39. MEAP Nisou: 8.3 shots per match, PAEEK: 7.8.
Match halves
MEAP Nisou: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.46. PAEEK: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
MEAP Nisou: 31-45+ (8 goals). PAEEK: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 2.61 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
PAEEK appear to be the favorites for this match, occupying 2nd place in the table compared to MEAP Nisou's 7th position. The hosts are in very poor home form with just a 25% win rate at home and a negative goal difference of -13, conceding an average of 2.08 goals per game. PAEEK demonstrate much better away performance, with a 33% win rate, better efficiency (15% shot conversion vs the hosts' 10%), and higher possession (57% vs 49%). The visitors also have a solid away defense with 42% clean sheets and averaging only 1.17 goals conceded per match. Despite both teams' average recent form (1.4 PPG for the hosts, 1.0 PPG for the visitors), the overall season statistics clearly favor PAEEK, making an away win the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| MEAP Nisou | PAEEK | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 49% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.18 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
MEAP Nisou is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - MEAP Nisou · 1 pts / match - PAEEK
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
PAEEK is 31% better for: goals scored per match.
1.08 goals / match - MEAP Nisou · 1.42 goals / match - PAEEK
PAEEK is 90% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.67 goals / match - MEAP Nisou · 0.88 goals / match - PAEEK
MEAP Nisou scores in 67% of matches (16 of 24 matches), while PAEEK keeps a clean sheet in 50% (12 of 24 matches).
PAEEK scores in 75% of matches (18 of 24 matches), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 29% (7 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - MEAP Nisou
Over / Under - PAEEK
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
PAEEK is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / match - MEAP Nisou · 1.38 pts / match - PAEEK
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
MEAP Nisou - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
PAEEK - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
MEAP Nisou
PAEEK
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| MEAP Nisou | Liga | PAEEK | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.75 | 2.61 | ▼ 2.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 46% | 48% | ▼ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 46% | 47% | • 46% |
| Clean sheets | • 29% | 30% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 72% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 76% | ▼ 63% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- PAEEKGoalThemistoklis Themistokleous
- PAEEKGoalIoannis Avramidis
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): MEAP Nisou 0 - 0 - 2 PAEEK. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of MEAP Nisou vs PAEEK?
The Second Division match finished MEAP Nisou 1:2 PAEEK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between MEAP Nisou and PAEEK?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches MEAP Nisou won 0, PAEEK won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before MEAP Nisou vs PAEEK?
MEAP Nisou score 1.08 goals per game on average and PAEEK 1.42. The Second Division average is 2.61 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 46% of MEAP Nisou's matches and 46% of PAEEK's.
What form are MEAP Nisou and PAEEK in?
Over the last 5 games MEAP Nisou have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and PAEEK 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MEAP Nisou vs PAEEK?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for MEAP Nisou vs PAEEK: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.