Mebrat Hayl vs Adama Kenema: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mebrat Hayl played Adama Kenema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 30 November 2025. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Mebrat Hayl: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Adama Kenema: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mebrat Hayl scores 0.86 and concedes 0.43 goals per match. Adama Kenema scores 0.57 and concedes 0.29. League average: 1.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mebrat Hayl 14%, Adama Kenema 14%. Over 2.5: Mebrat Hayl 14%, Adama Kenema 14%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 29%.

xG, shots and style

Adama Kenema has higher xG: 1.07 vs 1.06. Mebrat Hayl: 6.7 shots per match, Adama Kenema: 7.0.

Match halves

Mebrat Hayl: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.86. Adama Kenema: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.43.

Goals by minute

Mebrat Hayl: 46-60 (5 goals). Adama Kenema: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.79 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 29%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
4Shots1
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
-1Shots on target-1
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
0xG0
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
1Corners2
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
92Dangerous attacks89
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
11Fouls11
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
0Cards0
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
0.86Goals scored / match0.57
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
0.43Goals conceded / match0.29
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
52%Average possession56%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
2.29Shots on target / match1.71
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.71Shots per match7
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
2.29Shots on target1.71
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
12.8%Shot conversion8.2%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
52%Possession56%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
1.06xG for1.07
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
1.03xG against0.86
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema

Shooting quality

Mebrat Hayl: BalancedAdama Kenema: Balanced
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
Accuracy (shots on target)34%24%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mebrat Hayl
WWDLW
Season result split
57% W29% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 at home
3-1-0
WWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Adama Kenema
DWWLW
Season result split
43% W43% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-1
1.71 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 away
1-1-1
DWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.02Opponent xG: 0.90BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mebrat Hayl is 51% better for: goals scored per match.

0.86 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl · 0.57 goals / match - Adama Kenema

Adama Kenema is 48% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.43 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl · 0.29 goals / match - Adama Kenema

Mebrat Hayl scoring profile: more difficult

Mebrat Hayl scores in 57% of matches (4 of 7 matches), while Adama Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 86% (6 of 7 matches).

Adama Kenema scoring profile: more difficult

Adama Kenema scores in 57% of matches (4 of 7 matches), while Mebrat Hayl keeps a clean sheet in 71% (5 of 7 matches).

6Goals scored (season)4
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
3Goals conceded (season)2
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
1.29Average goals in match0.86
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
5Goals scored (last 5)4
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
3Goals conceded (last 5)2
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema

How often they score at least...

57%1 goal57%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
14%2 goals0%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
14%3 goals0%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
0%4 goals0%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema

How often they concede at least...

29%1 goal14%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
14%2 goals14%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
0%3 goals0%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
0%4 goals0%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
0%Scored in both halves0%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema

BTTS and goal count

14%Min. 3 goals and BTTS14%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
20%BTTS - last 520%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

14%Min. 1 goal before half-time14%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time43%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time14%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Adama Kenema is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.86 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl · 1.29 pts / match - Adama Kenema

Mebrat Hayl - half-time state
0% leading86% draw14% trailing
Adama Kenema - half-time state
14% leading86% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.86Points per match (1st half)1.29
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
0Goals scored (1st half)0.14
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
0.14Goals conceded (1st half)0
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
0.14Average goals (1st half)0.14
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
86%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
100%No goal before half-time86%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)1.43
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)0.43
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
0.29Goals conceded (2nd half)0.29
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
1.14Average goals (2nd half)0.71
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
86%Clean sheet after half-time86%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema
43%No goal after half-time57%
Mebrat HaylAdama Kenema

Mebrat Hayl - second-half results

57% W29% R14% P
6
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.86
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Adama Kenema - second-half results

29% W57% R14% P
9
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding307%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mebrat Hayl - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.21.4
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Adama Kenema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.21.0
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mebrat Hayl
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
5
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Adama Kenema
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.07
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.6 : 0.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
60%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
14%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
32%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mebrat Hayl

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.60
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
47%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.9
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Adama Kenema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.50
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.57
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
33%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Mebrat HaylLigaAdama Kenema
Average goals in match 1.291.79 0.86
Both teams scored 14%40% 14%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 14%29% 14%
Clean sheets 71%39% 86%
Goal before half-time 14%53% 14%
Goal after half-time 71%62% 43%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.79
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
0.88
Home goals / match
0.92
Away goals / match
+-4%
Home attack advantage
+-5%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Mebrat Hayl vs Adama Kenema?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Mebrat Hayl 0:0 Adama Kenema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mebrat Hayl vs Adama Kenema?

Mebrat Hayl score 0.86 goals per game on average and Adama Kenema 0.57. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 29% of games. Both teams score in 14% of Mebrat Hayl's matches and 14% of Adama Kenema's.

What form are Mebrat Hayl and Adama Kenema in?

Over the last 5 games Mebrat Hayl have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Adama Kenema 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mebrat Hayl vs Adama Kenema?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mebrat Hayl vs Adama Kenema: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.