Ghana - Ghana Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Medeama vs Bibiani Gold Stars: match statistics

Medeama crest
Medeama
2 : 0half-time 2:0
Bibiani Gold Stars crest
Bibiani Gold Stars

Medeama vs Bibiani Gold Stars: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Medeama play Bibiani Gold Stars in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match date is 3 May 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Medeama: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Bibiani Gold Stars: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Medeama scores 1.53 and concedes 0.82 goals per match. Bibiani Gold Stars scores 1.30 and concedes 1.21. League average: 2.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Medeama 53%, Bibiani Gold Stars 36%. Over 2.5: Medeama 47%, Bibiani Gold Stars 42%. League level: BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Medeama has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.15. Medeama: 9.5 shots per match, Bibiani Gold Stars: 5.0.

Match halves

Medeama: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.76. Bibiani Gold Stars: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.70.

Goals by minute

Medeama: 16-30 (14 goals). Bibiani Gold Stars: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ghana Premier League: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I predict a home win (1): Medeama has a clear advantage in offensive output and quality of chances — at home they average 1.87 goals scored and xG 1.85, while Bibiani average only 0.73 goals and xG 0.99 away. The home defense is stronger too: Medeama concedes 0.6 goals per home match (xG against 0.82) and keeps a clean sheet in 47% of games, whereas the visitors concede 1.73 goals away (xG against 1.57) and have only 13% clean sheets. Game control and chance creation strongly favor Medeama — 60% possession, 16.67 shots and 6.75 on target per home match versus 44% possession, 7.8 shots and 2.2 on target for Bibiani away. Additionally, recent-form and five-match stats: Medeama scored 10 goals in the last 5 matches and average 1.4 points per game, while Bibiani scored only 5 goals and 1.2 points per game; the hosts’ home goal difference is +19 versus -15 for the visitors. Even though the visitors have slightly better shot conversion away (13% vs 10% for the hosts), the high volume of chances, low FTS rate for the hosts (7% vs 53% for the visitors) and Medeama’s 67% home win rate make them the favorite in this matchup.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
9Shots3
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
3Shots on target0
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
0.89xG0.34
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
3Corners3
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
16Dangerous attacks21
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
-1Fouls-1
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
-1Cards-1
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
1.53Goals scored / match1.3
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
0.82Goals conceded / match1.21
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
45%Average possession27%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
3.59Shots on target / match1.09
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.5Shots per match4.97
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
3.59Shots on target1.09
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
16.1%Shot conversion26.2%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
45%Possession27%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
1.43xG for1.15
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
1.07xG against1.31
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars

Shooting quality

Medeama: Counter-attackingBibiani Gold Stars: Counter-attacking
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
Accuracy (shots on target)38%22%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.23
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.431.19

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Medeama is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Medeama · 1.2 pts / match - Bibiani Gold Stars

Medeama
WLWWL
Season result split
50% W32% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-11-6
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
12-4-1
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.99Opponent xG: 0.69BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Bibiani Gold Stars
LLWLW
Season result split
55% W9% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
18-3-12
1.73 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-12
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 0.68Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Medeama is 18% better for: goals scored per match.

1.53 goals / match - Medeama · 1.3 goals / match - Bibiani Gold Stars

Medeama is 48% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.82 goals / match - Medeama · 1.21 goals / match - Bibiani Gold Stars

Medeama scoring profile: very strong

Medeama scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Bibiani Gold Stars keeps a clean sheet in 36% (12 of 33 matches).

Bibiani Gold Stars scoring profile: mixed

Bibiani Gold Stars scores in 67% of matches (22 of 33 matches), while Medeama keeps a clean sheet in 44% (15 of 34 matches).

52Goals scored (season)43
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
28Goals conceded (season)40
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
2.35Average goals in match2.52
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
11Goals scored (last 5)12
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
8Goals conceded (last 5)10
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal67%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
44%2 goals33%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
15%3 goals15%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
9%4 goals3%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars

How often they concede at least...

56%1 goal64%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
21%2 goals45%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
3%3 goals12%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
3%4 goals0%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

36%
Bibiani Gold Stars - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 33 matches
34%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time12%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
3%BTTS in both halves3%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
26%Scored in both halves15%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
60%BTTS - last 560%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time39%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time48%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Medeama is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.56 pts / match - Medeama · 1.39 pts / match - Bibiani Gold Stars

Medeama - half-time state
38% leading41% draw21% trailing
Bibiani Gold Stars - half-time state
39% leading21% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.56Points per match (1st half)1.39
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
0.76Goals scored (1st half)0.61
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.76
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
1.15Average goals (1st half)1.36
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
65%Clean sheet before half-time48%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
50%No goal before half-time58%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars

After half-time (2nd half)

1.65Points per match (2nd half)1.39
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.7
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
0.44Goals conceded (2nd half)0.45
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
1.21Average goals (2nd half)1.15
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
68%Clean sheet after half-time70%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars
41%No goal after half-time61%
MedeamaBibiani Gold Stars

Medeama - second-half results

41% W41% R18% P
53
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
56
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Bibiani Gold Stars - second-half results

27% W58% R15% P
46
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.39
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Medeama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.62.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Bibiani Gold Stars - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.81.6
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.62.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Medeama
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
14
5
16-30
7
5
31-45
3
6
46-60
9
4
61-75
14
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (14 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Bibiani Gold Stars
ScoredConceded
4
9
0-15
8
6
16-30
8
10
31-45
6
6
46-60
5
4
61-75
12
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.43
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
120%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Medeama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-17.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Bibiani Gold Stars

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
197%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).

Teams vs league

MedeamaLigaBibiani Gold Stars
Average goals in match 2.352.03 2.52
Both teams scored 53%34% 36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%34% 42%
Clean sheets 44%41% 36%
Goal before half-time 68%62% 82%
Goal after half-time 71%59% 48%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.03
Average goals per match
34%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
0.66
Away goals / match
+108%
Home attack advantage
+52%
Home defence advantage
+42%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Medeama 0 - 1 - 0 Bibiani Gold Stars. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Medeama vs Bibiani Gold Stars?

The Ghana Premier League match finished Medeama 2:0 Bibiani Gold Stars. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Medeama vs Bibiani Gold Stars?

Medeama score 1.53 goals per game on average and Bibiani Gold Stars 1.30. The Ghana Premier League average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Medeama's matches and 36% of Bibiani Gold Stars's.

What form are Medeama and Bibiani Gold Stars in?

Over the last 5 games Medeama have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Bibiani Gold Stars 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Medeama vs Bibiani Gold Stars?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Medeama vs Bibiani Gold Stars: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.