Ghana - Ghana Premier LeagueData current as of 08 September 2026

Medeama vs Hearts of Oak: match statistics

Medeama crest
Medeama
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Hearts of Oak crest
Hearts of Oak
155%(1.82)
X30%(3.00)
215%(4.60)

Medeama sits at the top of the table and displays impressive home form with a 63% win rate and only one defeat all season. The hosts average 1.63 goals per home match with an xG of 2.08, indicating offensive efficiency. Hearts of Oak boasts a solid away defense (75% clean sheets), but their attack is weak—averaging just 0.63 goals per away match with 63% of games ending without them scoring. The visitors' recent form is unstable (2 losses in the last 5 matches), whereas Medeama remains unbeaten in this period. Considering Medeama's advantage in possession (61% vs 51%), superior shooting efficiency, and home field advantage, the hosts are favorites to secure three points, although the defensive solidity of Hearts of Oak could result in a hard-fought victory or a draw.

Medeama vs Hearts of Oak: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Medeama played Hearts of Oak in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match was played on 4 January 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Medeama: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Hearts of Oak: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Medeama scores 1.31 and concedes 0.63 goals per match. Hearts of Oak scores 0.73 and concedes 0.33. League average: 1.89 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Medeama 50%, Hearts of Oak 13%. Over 2.5: Medeama 38%, Hearts of Oak 13%. League level: BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Medeama has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.30. Medeama: 14.6 shots per match, Hearts of Oak: 7.5.

Match halves

Medeama: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.69. Hearts of Oak: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

Medeama: 76-90+ (7 goals). Hearts of Oak: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ghana Premier League: 1.89 goals per match, BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Medeama sits at the top of the table and displays impressive home form with a 63% win rate and only one defeat all season. The hosts average 1.63 goals per home match with an xG of 2.08, indicating offensive efficiency. Hearts of Oak boasts a solid away defense (75% clean sheets), but their attack is weak—averaging just 0.63 goals per away match with 63% of games ending without them scoring. The visitors' recent form is unstable (2 losses in the last 5 matches), whereas Medeama remains unbeaten in this period. Considering Medeama's advantage in possession (61% vs 51%), superior shooting efficiency, and home field advantage, the hosts are favorites to secure three points, although the defensive solidity of Hearts of Oak could result in a hard-fought victory or a draw.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
MedeamaHearts of Oak
16Shots8
MedeamaHearts of Oak
9Shots on target2
MedeamaHearts of Oak
2xG1.02
MedeamaHearts of Oak
6Corners4
MedeamaHearts of Oak
51Dangerous attacks51
MedeamaHearts of Oak
12Fouls27
MedeamaHearts of Oak
0Cards0
MedeamaHearts of Oak

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

MedeamaHearts of Oak
1.31Goals scored / match0.73
MedeamaHearts of Oak
0.63Goals conceded / match0.33
MedeamaHearts of Oak
57%Average possession48%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
5.44Shots on target / match2.93
MedeamaHearts of Oak

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.63Shots per match7.53
MedeamaHearts of Oak
5.44Shots on target2.93
MedeamaHearts of Oak
9%Shot conversion9.7%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
57%Possession48%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
1.6xG for1.3
MedeamaHearts of Oak
1.14xG against1.04
MedeamaHearts of Oak

Shooting quality

Medeama: DominantHearts of Oak: Balanced
MedeamaHearts of Oak
Accuracy (shots on target)37%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Hearts of Oak is 11% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Medeama · 2 pts / match - Hearts of Oak

Medeama
DWDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W44% R6% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-1
1.94 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-0
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Hearts of Oak
WLWDW
Season result split
47% W47% R7% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-7-1
1.87 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-4-1
Last 5 away
1-3-1
WDDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 0.98BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Medeama is 79% better for: goals scored per match.

1.31 goals / match - Medeama · 0.73 goals / match - Hearts of Oak

Hearts of Oak is 91% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.63 goals / match - Medeama · 0.33 goals / match - Hearts of Oak

Medeama scoring profile: more difficult

Medeama scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while Hearts of Oak keeps a clean sheet in 80% (12 of 15 matches).

Hearts of Oak scoring profile: mixed

Hearts of Oak scores in 53% of matches (8 of 15 matches), while Medeama keeps a clean sheet in 44% (7 of 16 matches).

21Goals scored (season)11
MedeamaHearts of Oak
10Goals conceded (season)5
MedeamaHearts of Oak
1.94Average goals in match1.07
MedeamaHearts of Oak
6Goals scored (last 5)3
MedeamaHearts of Oak
4Goals conceded (last 5)2
MedeamaHearts of Oak

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal53%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
44%2 goals20%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
6%3 goals0%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
6%4 goals0%
MedeamaHearts of Oak

How often they concede at least...

56%1 goal20%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
6%2 goals13%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
0%3 goals0%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
0%4 goals0%
MedeamaHearts of Oak

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

34%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time0%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
0%BTTS in both halves0%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
31%Scored in both halves13%
MedeamaHearts of Oak

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS13%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
60%BTTS - last 50%
MedeamaHearts of Oak

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time47%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time7%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
MedeamaHearts of Oak

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time27%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
MedeamaHearts of Oak

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Hearts of Oak is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.56 pts / match - Medeama · 1.73 pts / match - Hearts of Oak

Medeama - half-time state
38% leading44% draw19% trailing
Hearts of Oak - half-time state
40% leading53% draw7% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.56Points per match (1st half)1.73
MedeamaHearts of Oak
0.63Goals scored (1st half)0.4
MedeamaHearts of Oak
0.31Goals conceded (1st half)0.13
MedeamaHearts of Oak
0.94Average goals (1st half)0.53
MedeamaHearts of Oak
69%Clean sheet before half-time93%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
50%No goal before half-time60%
MedeamaHearts of Oak

After half-time (2nd half)

1.75Points per match (2nd half)1.2
MedeamaHearts of Oak
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
MedeamaHearts of Oak
0.31Goals conceded (2nd half)0.2
MedeamaHearts of Oak
1Average goals (2nd half)0.53
MedeamaHearts of Oak
75%Clean sheet after half-time87%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
44%No goal after half-time73%
MedeamaHearts of Oak

Medeama - second-half results

44% W44% R13% P
25
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Hearts of Oak - second-half results

13% W80% R7% P
26
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding118%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Medeama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Hearts of Oak - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match0.80.2
1 goal60%20%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Medeama
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
5
1
16-30
3
2
31-45
1
3
46-60
3
0
61-75
7
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Hearts of Oak
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
3
2
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
79%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
32%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Medeama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Hearts of Oak

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.57
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.71
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
26%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).

Teams vs league

MedeamaLigaHearts of Oak
Average goals in match 1.941.89 1.07
Both teams scored 50%34% 13%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%28% 13%
Clean sheets 44%41% 80%
Goal before half-time 69%62% 47%
Goal after half-time 69%60% 27%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.89
Average goals per match
34%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.29
Home goals / match
0.60
Away goals / match
+115%
Home attack advantage
+53%
Home defence advantage
+44%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MedeamaGoalSalim Adams

FAQ

What was the result of Medeama vs Hearts of Oak?

The Ghana Premier League match finished Medeama 1:0 Hearts of Oak. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Medeama vs Hearts of Oak?

Medeama score 1.31 goals per game on average and Hearts of Oak 0.73. The Ghana Premier League average is 1.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Medeama's matches and 13% of Hearts of Oak's.

What form are Medeama and Hearts of Oak in?

Over the last 5 games Medeama have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Hearts of Oak 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Medeama vs Hearts of Oak?

The statistical background for Medeama vs Hearts of Oak — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.