Ghana - Ghana Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Medeama vs Hearts of Oak: match statistics

Medeama crest
Medeama
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Hearts of Oak crest
Hearts of Oak
155%(1.82)
X30%(3.00)
215%(4.60)

Medeama sits at the top of the table and displays impressive home form with a 63% win rate and only one defeat all season. The hosts average 1.63 goals per home match with an xG of 2.08, indicating offensive efficiency. Hearts of Oak boasts a solid away defense (75% clean sheets), but their attack is weak—averaging just 0.63 goals per away match with 63% of games ending without them scoring. The visitors' recent form is unstable (2 losses in the last 5 matches), whereas Medeama remains unbeaten in this period. Considering Medeama's advantage in possession (61% vs 51%), superior shooting efficiency, and home field advantage, the hosts are favorites to secure three points, although the defensive solidity of Hearts of Oak could result in a hard-fought victory or a draw.

Medeama vs Hearts of Oak: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Medeama play Hearts of Oak in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match date is 4 January 2026 at 16:30. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Medeama: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Hearts of Oak: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Medeama scores 1.53 and concedes 0.82 goals per match. Hearts of Oak scores 0.76 and concedes 0.42. League average: 2.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Medeama 53%, Hearts of Oak 15%. Over 2.5: Medeama 47%, Hearts of Oak 18%. League level: BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Medeama has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.31. Medeama: 9.5 shots per match, Hearts of Oak: 7.1.

Match halves

Medeama: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.76. Hearts of Oak: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.42.

Goals by minute

Medeama: 16-30 (14 goals). Hearts of Oak: 61-75 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ghana Premier League: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Medeama sits at the top of the table and displays impressive home form with a 63% win rate and only one defeat all season. The hosts average 1.63 goals per home match with an xG of 2.08, indicating offensive efficiency. Hearts of Oak boasts a solid away defense (75% clean sheets), but their attack is weak—averaging just 0.63 goals per away match with 63% of games ending without them scoring. The visitors' recent form is unstable (2 losses in the last 5 matches), whereas Medeama remains unbeaten in this period. Considering Medeama's advantage in possession (61% vs 51%), superior shooting efficiency, and home field advantage, the hosts are favorites to secure three points, although the defensive solidity of Hearts of Oak could result in a hard-fought victory or a draw.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
MedeamaHearts of Oak
16Shots8
MedeamaHearts of Oak
9Shots on target2
MedeamaHearts of Oak
2xG1.02
MedeamaHearts of Oak
6Corners4
MedeamaHearts of Oak
51Dangerous attacks51
MedeamaHearts of Oak
12Fouls27
MedeamaHearts of Oak
0Cards0
MedeamaHearts of Oak

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

MedeamaHearts of Oak
1.53Goals scored / match0.76
MedeamaHearts of Oak
0.82Goals conceded / match0.42
MedeamaHearts of Oak
45%Average possession46%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
3.59Shots on target / match2.85
MedeamaHearts of Oak

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.5Shots per match7.06
MedeamaHearts of Oak
3.59Shots on target2.85
MedeamaHearts of Oak
16.1%Shot conversion10.7%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
45%Possession46%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
1.43xG for1.31
MedeamaHearts of Oak
1.07xG against1.09
MedeamaHearts of Oak

Shooting quality

Medeama: Counter-attackingHearts of Oak: Balanced
MedeamaHearts of Oak
Accuracy (shots on target)38%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.19
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Medeama is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Medeama · 1.6 pts / match - Hearts of Oak

Medeama
WLWWL
Season result split
50% W32% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-11-6
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
12-4-1
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.99Opponent xG: 0.69BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Hearts of Oak
WDDLW
Season result split
39% W45% R15% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-15-5
1.64 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-5-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 0.96BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Medeama is 101% better for: goals scored per match.

1.53 goals / match - Medeama · 0.76 goals / match - Hearts of Oak

Hearts of Oak is 95% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.82 goals / match - Medeama · 0.42 goals / match - Hearts of Oak

Medeama scoring profile: mixed

Medeama scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Hearts of Oak keeps a clean sheet in 73% (24 of 33 matches).

Hearts of Oak scoring profile: mixed

Hearts of Oak scores in 48% of matches (16 of 33 matches), while Medeama keeps a clean sheet in 44% (15 of 34 matches).

52Goals scored (season)25
MedeamaHearts of Oak
28Goals conceded (season)14
MedeamaHearts of Oak
2.35Average goals in match1.18
MedeamaHearts of Oak
11Goals scored (last 5)5
MedeamaHearts of Oak
8Goals conceded (last 5)3
MedeamaHearts of Oak

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal48%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
44%2 goals18%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
15%3 goals6%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
9%4 goals3%
MedeamaHearts of Oak

How often they concede at least...

56%1 goal27%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
21%2 goals15%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
3%3 goals0%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
3%4 goals0%
MedeamaHearts of Oak

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

34%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time0%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
3%BTTS in both halves0%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
26%Scored in both halves12%
MedeamaHearts of Oak

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS15%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
60%BTTS - last 520%
MedeamaHearts of Oak

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time42%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time6%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
MedeamaHearts of Oak

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time36%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time21%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
MedeamaHearts of Oak

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Medeama - half-time state
38% leading41% draw21% trailing
Hearts of Oak - half-time state
33% leading58% draw9% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.56Points per match (1st half)1.58
MedeamaHearts of Oak
0.76Goals scored (1st half)0.33
MedeamaHearts of Oak
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.15
MedeamaHearts of Oak
1.15Average goals (1st half)0.48
MedeamaHearts of Oak
65%Clean sheet before half-time91%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
50%No goal before half-time67%
MedeamaHearts of Oak

After half-time (2nd half)

1.65Points per match (2nd half)1.24
MedeamaHearts of Oak
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.42
MedeamaHearts of Oak
0.44Goals conceded (2nd half)0.27
MedeamaHearts of Oak
1.21Average goals (2nd half)0.7
MedeamaHearts of Oak
68%Clean sheet after half-time79%
MedeamaHearts of Oak
41%No goal after half-time73%
MedeamaHearts of Oak

Medeama - second-half results

41% W41% R18% P
53
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
56
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Hearts of Oak - second-half results

18% W70% R12% P
52
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.58
PPG before half-time
Lead holding118%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Medeama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.62.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Hearts of Oak - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.41.2
1 goal40%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Medeama
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
14
5
16-30
7
5
31-45
3
6
46-60
9
4
61-75
14
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (14 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Hearts of Oak
ScoredConceded
6
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
4
2
31-45
2
2
46-60
7
4
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.77
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+240%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
39%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Medeama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-17.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Hearts of Oak

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-21.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.55
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.67
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
31%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).

Teams vs league

MedeamaLigaHearts of Oak
Average goals in match 2.352.03 1.18
Both teams scored 53%34% 15%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%34% 18%
Clean sheets 44%41% 73%
Goal before half-time 68%62% 42%
Goal after half-time 71%59% 36%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.03
Average goals per match
34%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
0.66
Away goals / match
+108%
Home attack advantage
+52%
Home defence advantage
+42%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Medeama 0 - 0 - 1 Hearts of Oak. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Medeama vs Hearts of Oak?

The Ghana Premier League match finished Medeama 1:0 Hearts of Oak. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Medeama vs Hearts of Oak?

Medeama score 1.53 goals per game on average and Hearts of Oak 0.76. The Ghana Premier League average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Medeama's matches and 15% of Hearts of Oak's.

What form are Medeama and Hearts of Oak in?

Over the last 5 games Medeama have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Hearts of Oak 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Medeama vs Hearts of Oak?

The statistical background for Medeama vs Hearts of Oak — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.