Ghana - Ghana Premier LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

Medeama vs Karela: match statistics

Medeama crest
Medeama
3 : 1half-time 2:1
Karela crest
Karela
170%(0.00)
X20%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

Medeama presents impressive form as the table leader with a 70% win rate at home and only one defeat in the entire season. The hosts are in excellent disposition, winning 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 9 goals and conceding only 2. Karela, conversely, has not won any away match this season (0% away win rate) and finds itself in dismal form, losing 3 of the last 5 fixtures. Medeama's advantage is visible in all aspects: averaging 1.7 goals per match at home versus 0.7 goals for Karela away, significantly higher xG (2.01 vs 0.87), and dominance in possession (59% vs 42%). The goal difference of both teams (+12 for Medeama at home, -8 for Karela away) further confirms the decisive advantage of the hosts, who should comfortably win this encounter.

Medeama vs Karela: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Medeama played Karela in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match was played on 25 January 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Medeama: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Karela: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Medeama scores 1.42 and concedes 0.58 goals per match. Karela scores 1.00 and concedes 1.05. League average: 1.86 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Medeama 47%, Karela 47%. Over 2.5: Medeama 42%, Karela 26%. League level: BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 29%.

xG, shots and style

Medeama has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.01. Medeama: 14.4 shots per match, Karela: 6.5.

Match halves

Medeama: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.79. Karela: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.37.

Goals by minute

Medeama: 76-90+ (10 goals). Karela: 16-30 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ghana Premier League: 1.86 goals per match, BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 29%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Medeama presents impressive form as the table leader with a 70% win rate at home and only one defeat in the entire season. The hosts are in excellent disposition, winning 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 9 goals and conceding only 2. Karela, conversely, has not won any away match this season (0% away win rate) and finds itself in dismal form, losing 3 of the last 5 fixtures. Medeama's advantage is visible in all aspects: averaging 1.7 goals per match at home versus 0.7 goals for Karela away, significantly higher xG (2.01 vs 0.87), and dominance in possession (59% vs 42%). The goal difference of both teams (+12 for Medeama at home, -8 for Karela away) further confirms the decisive advantage of the hosts, who should comfortably win this encounter.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
MedeamaKarela
-1Shots-1
MedeamaKarela
-1Shots on target-1
MedeamaKarela
0xG0
MedeamaKarela
-1Corners-1
MedeamaKarela
0Dangerous attacks0
MedeamaKarela
-1Fouls-1
MedeamaKarela
-1Cards-1
MedeamaKarela

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.42Goals scored / match1
MedeamaKarela
0.58Goals conceded / match1.05
MedeamaKarela
57%Average possession36%
MedeamaKarela
5.37Shots on target / match1.74
MedeamaKarela

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.37Shots per match6.47
MedeamaKarela
5.37Shots on target1.74
MedeamaKarela
9.9%Shot conversion15.4%
MedeamaKarela
57%Possession36%
MedeamaKarela
1.6xG for1.01
MedeamaKarela
1.12xG against1.09
MedeamaKarela

Shooting quality

Medeama: DominantKarela: Counter-attacking
MedeamaKarela
Accuracy (shots on target)37%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.57

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Medeama is 160% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Medeama · 1 pts / match - Karela

Medeama
WDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
58% W37% R5% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-7-1
2.11 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-3-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
DWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.12BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Karela
WDDLL
Season result split
32% W37% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-6
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-5-5
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DLDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.92Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Medeama is 42% better for: goals scored per match.

1.42 goals / match - Medeama · 1 goals / match - Karela

Medeama is 81% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.58 goals / match - Medeama · 1.05 goals / match - Karela

Medeama scoring profile: strong

Medeama scores in 79% of matches (15 of 19 matches), while Karela keeps a clean sheet in 42% (8 of 19 matches).

Karela scoring profile: strong

Karela scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Medeama keeps a clean sheet in 47% (9 of 19 matches).

27Goals scored (season)19
MedeamaKarela
11Goals conceded (season)20
MedeamaKarela
2Average goals in match2.05
MedeamaKarela
7Goals scored (last 5)3
MedeamaKarela
1Goals conceded (last 5)4
MedeamaKarela

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal74%
MedeamaKarela
47%2 goals21%
MedeamaKarela
11%3 goals5%
MedeamaKarela
5%4 goals0%
MedeamaKarela

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal58%
MedeamaKarela
5%2 goals26%
MedeamaKarela
0%3 goals11%
MedeamaKarela
0%4 goals11%
MedeamaKarela

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time21%
MedeamaKarela
0%BTTS in both halves5%
MedeamaKarela
32%Scored in both halves11%
MedeamaKarela

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
MedeamaKarela
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
MedeamaKarela
20%BTTS - last 540%
MedeamaKarela

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
MedeamaKarela
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
MedeamaKarela
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
MedeamaKarela

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time58%
MedeamaKarela
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time21%
MedeamaKarela
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
MedeamaKarela

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Medeama - half-time state
37% leading42% draw21% trailing
Karela - half-time state
32% leading53% draw16% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.53Points per match (1st half)1.47
MedeamaKarela
0.63Goals scored (1st half)0.63
MedeamaKarela
0.32Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
MedeamaKarela
0.95Average goals (1st half)1.11
MedeamaKarela
68%Clean sheet before half-time68%
MedeamaKarela
53%No goal before half-time47%
MedeamaKarela

After half-time (2nd half)

1.95Points per match (2nd half)0.89
MedeamaKarela
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)0.37
MedeamaKarela
0.26Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
MedeamaKarela
1.05Average goals (2nd half)0.95
MedeamaKarela
79%Clean sheet after half-time53%
MedeamaKarela
37%No goal after half-time68%
MedeamaKarela

Medeama - second-half results

53% W37% R11% P
29
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.53
PPG before half-time
Lead holding157%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 58%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Karela - second-half results

11% W58% R32% P
28
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Medeama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.20
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Karela - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.41.0
1 goal20%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Medeama
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
6
1
16-30
4
3
31-45
1
3
46-60
4
0
61-75
10
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Karela
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
5
3
16-30
3
5
31-45
1
3
46-60
5
2
61-75
1
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.02
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-51%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Medeama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

Karela

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
167%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
5% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
5%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).

Teams vs league

MedeamaLigaKarela
Average goals in match 2.001.86 2.05
Both teams scored 47%33% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 42%29% 26%
Clean sheets 47%42% 42%
Goal before half-time 68%61% 63%
Goal after half-time 74%60% 58%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.86
Average goals per match
33%
Both teams scored
29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
42%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
0.60
Away goals / match
+110%
Home attack advantage
+52%
Home defence advantage
+42%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MedeamaGoalDerrick Fordjour

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Medeama 0 - 0 - 1 Karela. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Karela
1 : 0
Medeama

FAQ

What was the result of Medeama vs Karela?

The Ghana Premier League match finished Medeama 3:1 Karela. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Medeama vs Karela?

Medeama score 1.42 goals per game on average and Karela 1.00. The Ghana Premier League average is 1.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 29% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Medeama's matches and 47% of Karela's.

What form are Medeama and Karela in?

Over the last 5 games Medeama have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Karela 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Medeama vs Karela?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.