Match suspended or postponed
The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.
Medeama vs Port City: match statistics
Medeama vs Port City: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Medeama play Port City in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context. Venue: Tarkwa T&A Park.
Current form
Medeama: 0-1-0, 1.00 points/match. Port City: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Medeama scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Port City scores 1.50 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.36 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Medeama 100%, Port City 100%. Over 2.5: Medeama 0%, Port City 50%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Medeama has higher xG: 2.24 vs 0.00. Medeama: 19.0 shots per match, Port City: -1.0.
Match halves
Medeama: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00. Port City: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Medeama: 46-60 (1 goals). Port City: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ghana Premier League: 2.36 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Medeama | Port City | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 0% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.00 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.13 | 0.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Port City is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Medeama · 2 pts / match - Port City
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Port City is 50% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Medeama · 1.5 goals / match - Port City
Medeama scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Port City keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).
Port City scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Medeama keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Medeama
Over / Under - Port City
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Medeama - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Port City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.00 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.50 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.5 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 50% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Medeama
Port City
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Medeama | Liga | Port City | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.00 | 2.36 | ▲ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 52% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 0% | 52% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 30% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 76% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 64% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.