China - China League OneHuitang StadiumData current as of 31 August 2026

Meizhou Hakka vs Guangzhou E-Power: match statistics

Meizhou Hakka vs Guangzhou E-Power: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Meizhou Hakka played Guangzhou E-Power in China League One (China). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Venue: Huitang Stadium. Final score: 1:5.

Current form

Meizhou Hakka: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Guangzhou E-Power: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Meizhou Hakka scores 1.00 and concedes 1.84 goals per match. Guangzhou E-Power scores 1.89 and concedes 0.84. League average: 2.62 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Meizhou Hakka 47%, Guangzhou E-Power 53%. Over 2.5: Meizhou Hakka 63%, Guangzhou E-Power 53%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Guangzhou E-Power has higher xG: 1.79 vs 1.10. Meizhou Hakka: 8.7 shots per match, Guangzhou E-Power: 16.2.

Match halves

Meizhou Hakka: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.47. Guangzhou E-Power: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.95.

Goals by minute

Meizhou Hakka: 31-45+ (4 goals). Guangzhou E-Power: 16-30 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

China League One: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Guangzhou E-Power lead the standings and have won 13 of their 19 matches this season, while Meizhou Hakka have recorded just 6 victories and suffered 11 defeats. The visitors are in excellent form: they have won 4 and drawn 1 of their last five matches, scoring 9 goals and conceding only 2. Away from home, Guangzhou average 1.89 goals scored and concede just 1.00 per match, whereas Meizhou concede as many as 2.22 goals at home, with an average of 1.33 scored. The visitors’ advantage is also evident in chance creation, as they average 12.89 shots and 4.22 shots on target away from home, compared with the hosts’ 9.11 and 3.44, respectively. Meizhou may pose a threat, but with only 11% of home matches ending with a clean sheet and a 56% home defeat rate, a victory for the league leaders is the more likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Meizhou Hakka keep a clean sheet in 60% of their matches, while Guangzhou E-Power fail to score in 11%, strengthening the possibility of keeping the visitors off the scoresheet. The hosts concede just 0.7 goals per match on average, with an xG against them of 0.92, while their opponents have scored only 2 goals across their last five appearances and conceded an average of 0.4. BTTS - Yes has landed in 40% of each team’s last five matches, well below the league average of 55%. Meizhou do, however, average 1.9 goals, compared with 1.89 for Guangzhou, so a Goal/Goal outcome remains realistic. Nevertheless, the hosts’ stronger defence gives a slight edge to the BTTS - No scenario, meaning that at least one team fails to score—not necessarily a 0:0 draw.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The Over 1.5 goals line is strongly supported by seasonal data: at least two goals were scored in 80% of Meizhou Hakka’s matches and 78% of Guangzhou E-Power’s fixtures. Both teams find the net regularly, averaging 1.90 and 1.89 goals per match respectively, while their average xG stands at 2.03 for the hosts and 1.53 for the visitors. Guangzhou E-Power’s recent form further supports a high-scoring scenario, with the team scoring 9 goals and conceding just 2 in its last five appearances, whereas Meizhou Hakka conceded 6 goals over the same period. Caution is advised with higher lines due to the visitors’ solid defensive record in their last five matches and the fact that the hosts went Over 2.5 goals in only 40% of their matches this season. The projected total of 2.65 goals therefore primarily points to a high probability of clearing the 1.5-goal mark, without an equally clear edge on Over 2.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Guangzhou E-Power victory, as the visitors were level at the break in 56% of their matches, compared with 40% for Meizhou Hakka. Both teams are usually very solid before half-time: the hosts concede an average of just 0.30 goals in that period, while the visitors allow only 0.22, reinforcing the likelihood of a closely contested opening. Current form, however, clearly favours Guangzhou E-Power, who have averaged 2.6 points and won 80% of their last five matches, whereas Meizhou have averaged 1.2 points and suffered defeat in 60% of their games. After the break, the hosts score 1.10 goals per match on a seasonal basis, while the visitors concede 0.78 in this phase. However, Meizhou’s recent output stands at just 0.40 goals after half-time, so the currently stronger visitors have a greater chance of turning a level first half in their favour.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
1 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
9Shots14
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
2Shots on target10
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
1.02xG1.92
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
5Corners3
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
44Dangerous attacks47
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
11Fouls11
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
2Cards0
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
1Goals scored / match1.89
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
1.84Goals conceded / match0.84
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
45%Average possession55%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
2.95Shots on target / match4.89
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.74Shots per match16.21
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
2.95Shots on target4.89
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
11.4%Shot conversion11.7%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
45%Possession55%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
1.1xG for1.79
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
1.59xG against1.14
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power

Shooting quality

Meizhou Hakka: BalancedGuangzhou E-Power: Dominant
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
Accuracy (shots on target)34%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Guangzhou E-Power is 117% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Meizhou Hakka · 2.6 pts / match - Guangzhou E-Power

Meizhou Hakka
WLLWL
Season result split
32% W11% R58% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-11
1.05 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-5
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Guangzhou E-Power
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
68% W21% R11% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-4-2
2.26 pts / match · goal difference +20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-2-1
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.04BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Guangzhou E-Power is 89% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Meizhou Hakka · 1.89 goals / match - Guangzhou E-Power

Guangzhou E-Power is 119% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.84 goals / match - Meizhou Hakka · 0.84 goals / match - Guangzhou E-Power

Meizhou Hakka scoring profile: mixed

Meizhou Hakka scores in 63% of matches (12 of 19 matches), while Guangzhou E-Power keeps a clean sheet in 42% (8 of 19 matches).

Guangzhou E-Power scoring profile: very strong

Guangzhou E-Power scores in 89% of matches (17 of 19 matches), while Meizhou Hakka keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).

19Goals scored (season)36
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
35Goals conceded (season)16
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
2.84Average goals in match2.74
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
6Goals scored (last 5)9
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
6Goals conceded (last 5)2
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal89%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
26%2 goals68%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
11%3 goals32%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
0%4 goals0%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power

How often they concede at least...

84%1 goal58%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
58%2 goals16%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
32%3 goals5%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
11%4 goals5%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
Guangzhou E-Power - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 19 matches
55%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time16%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
16%Scored in both halves32%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
21%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
40%BTTS - last 540%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

89%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time68%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Guangzhou E-Power is 139% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.79 pts / match - Meizhou Hakka · 1.89 pts / match - Guangzhou E-Power

Meizhou Hakka - half-time state
21% leading16% draw63% trailing
Guangzhou E-Power - half-time state
47% leading47% draw5% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.79Points per match (1st half)1.89
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.95
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.26
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
1.53Average goals (1st half)1.21
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
32%Clean sheet before half-time79%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
53%No goal before half-time37%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.58
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.95
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
0.84Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
1.32Average goals (2nd half)1.53
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
42%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power
68%No goal after half-time42%
Meizhou HakkaGuangzhou E-Power

Meizhou Hakka - second-half results

21% W37% R42% P
15
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.79
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Guangzhou E-Power - second-half results

37% W47% R16% P
36
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.89
PPG before half-time
Lead holding145%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 68%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Meizhou Hakka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Guangzhou E-Power - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.60
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+5+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Meizhou Hakka
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
3
7
16-30
4
8
31-45
2
4
46-60
4
7
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Guangzhou E-Power
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
8
2
16-30
6
1
31-45
2
3
46-60
8
4
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.79
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Meizhou Hakka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
145%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Guangzhou E-Power

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.65
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
149%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
62%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).

Teams vs league

Meizhou HakkaLigaGuangzhou E-Power
Average goals in match 2.842.62 2.74
Both teams scored 47%55% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 63%52% 53%
Clean sheets 16%27% 42%
Goal before half-time 89%71% 68%
Goal after half-time 74%72% 68%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.62
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / match
1.27
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Meizhou HakkaSubstitutionOn: Jiajun LiaoOff: Wai Lim Yu
  2. Meizhou HakkaYellow cardChaosheng Yang
  3. Guangzhou E-PowerGoalMaycon Vinicius Ferreira da CruzAssist: Huaze Gao
  4. Guangzhou E-PowerSubstitutionOn: Yu HouOff: Kun Xiao
  5. Meizhou HakkaSubstitutionOn: Baojie ZhuOff: Yihu Yang
  6. Meizhou HakkaSubstitutionOn: Jiale SuOff: Jiarun Li
  7. Meizhou HakkaYellow cardXiaobin Sun
  8. Guangzhou E-PowerSubstitutionOn: Jihong JiangOff: Junjian Liao
  9. Guangzhou E-PowerSubstitutionOn: Xueming LiangOff: Ousmane Camara
  10. Meizhou HakkaGoalEnqi ZhangAssist: Hamza Sakhi
  11. Guangzhou E-PowerGoalJoão Carlos Cardoso SantoAssist: Xueming Liang

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Meizhou Hakka 0 - 0 - 1 Guangzhou E-Power. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Meizhou Hakka vs Guangzhou E-Power?

The China League One match finished Meizhou Hakka 1:5 Guangzhou E-Power. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Meizhou Hakka vs Guangzhou E-Power?

Meizhou Hakka score 1.00 goals per game on average and Guangzhou E-Power 1.89. The China League One average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Meizhou Hakka's matches and 53% of Guangzhou E-Power's.

What form are Meizhou Hakka and Guangzhou E-Power in?

Over the last 5 games Meizhou Hakka have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Guangzhou E-Power 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Meizhou Hakka vs Guangzhou E-Power?

The statistical background for Meizhou Hakka vs Guangzhou E-Power — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.