Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

Mekelakeya vs Bahardar: match statistics

Mekelakeya crest
Mekelakeya
1 : 2half-time 0:0
Bahardar crest
Bahardar
155%(2.50)
X30%(2.80)
215%(2.85)

Mekelakeya occupies a higher position in the table (5th place) and possesses a better goal difference at their own stadium (+1) compared to Bahardar, who have a negative goal difference in away matches (-3). The hosts demonstrate significantly better scoring efficiency at home (0.86 goals/match) and a higher xG (1.42) than the guests do on the road (0.33 goals/match and xG 1.06). Bahardar has not won a single away match this season (0% wins) and has failed to score in as many as 67% of matches. The form of both teams in the last five matches is poor; however, Mekelakeya holds home field advantage and better offensive stats. Bahardar's high percentage of away draws (67%) suggests a defensive approach, which could lead to a close contest, but the statistical advantage of the hosts points to their victory.

Mekelakeya vs Bahardar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mekelakeya played Bahardar in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 10 January 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Mekelakeya: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Bahardar: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mekelakeya scores 1.29 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. Bahardar scores 0.69 and concedes 0.69. League average: 1.71 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mekelakeya 50%, Bahardar 31%. Over 2.5: Mekelakeya 36%, Bahardar 23%. League level: BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 26%.

xG, shots and style

Mekelakeya has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.25. Mekelakeya: 9.6 shots per match, Bahardar: 8.8.

Match halves

Mekelakeya: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.29. Bahardar: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.46.

Goals by minute

Mekelakeya: 31-45+ (7 goals). Bahardar: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.71 goals per match, BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 26%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Mekelakeya occupies a higher position in the table (5th place) and possesses a better goal difference at their own stadium (+1) compared to Bahardar, who have a negative goal difference in away matches (-3). The hosts demonstrate significantly better scoring efficiency at home (0.86 goals/match) and a higher xG (1.42) than the guests do on the road (0.33 goals/match and xG 1.06). Bahardar has not won a single away match this season (0% wins) and has failed to score in as many as 67% of matches. The form of both teams in the last five matches is poor; however, Mekelakeya holds home field advantage and better offensive stats. Bahardar's high percentage of away draws (67%) suggests a defensive approach, which could lead to a close contest, but the statistical advantage of the hosts points to their victory.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
MekelakeyaBahardar
7Shots7
MekelakeyaBahardar
4Shots on target2
MekelakeyaBahardar
0.97xG0.81
MekelakeyaBahardar
4Corners6
MekelakeyaBahardar
32Dangerous attacks30
MekelakeyaBahardar
14Fouls20
MekelakeyaBahardar
0Cards0
MekelakeyaBahardar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.29Goals scored / match0.69
MekelakeyaBahardar
0.93Goals conceded / match0.69
MekelakeyaBahardar
53%Average possession52%
MekelakeyaBahardar
3.5Shots on target / match2.92
MekelakeyaBahardar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.57Shots per match8.85
MekelakeyaBahardar
3.5Shots on target2.92
MekelakeyaBahardar
13.4%Shot conversion7.8%
MekelakeyaBahardar
53%Possession52%
MekelakeyaBahardar
1.44xG for1.25
MekelakeyaBahardar
1.05xG against1.16
MekelakeyaBahardar

Shooting quality

Mekelakeya: Efficient finishingBahardar: Balanced
MekelakeyaBahardar
Accuracy (shots on target)37%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mekelakeya is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Mekelakeya · 0.8 pts / match - Bahardar

Mekelakeya
DDWLL
Season result split
36% W43% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-3
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-2
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
DLDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 0.92BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Bahardar
LDDDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
23% W54% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-7-3
1.23 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-4-2
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mekelakeya is 87% better for: goals scored per match.

1.29 goals / match - Mekelakeya · 0.69 goals / match - Bahardar

Bahardar is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.93 goals / match - Mekelakeya · 0.69 goals / match - Bahardar

Mekelakeya scoring profile: mixed

Mekelakeya scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Bahardar keeps a clean sheet in 62% (8 of 13 matches).

Bahardar scoring profile: mixed

Bahardar scores in 46% of matches (6 of 13 matches), while Mekelakeya keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).

18Goals scored (season)9
MekelakeyaBahardar
13Goals conceded (season)9
MekelakeyaBahardar
2.21Average goals in match1.38
MekelakeyaBahardar
4Goals scored (last 5)1
MekelakeyaBahardar
5Goals conceded (last 5)3
MekelakeyaBahardar

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal46%
MekelakeyaBahardar
43%2 goals15%
MekelakeyaBahardar
14%3 goals8%
MekelakeyaBahardar
0%4 goals0%
MekelakeyaBahardar

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal38%
MekelakeyaBahardar
29%2 goals15%
MekelakeyaBahardar
0%3 goals15%
MekelakeyaBahardar
0%4 goals0%
MekelakeyaBahardar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

42%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time15%
MekelakeyaBahardar
0%BTTS in both halves0%
MekelakeyaBahardar
14%Scored in both halves8%
MekelakeyaBahardar

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
MekelakeyaBahardar
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
MekelakeyaBahardar
40%BTTS - last 520%
MekelakeyaBahardar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time23%
MekelakeyaBahardar
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time15%
MekelakeyaBahardar
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
MekelakeyaBahardar

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time46%
MekelakeyaBahardar
14%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
MekelakeyaBahardar
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
MekelakeyaBahardar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mekelakeya is 52% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.64 pts / match - Mekelakeya · 1.08 pts / match - Bahardar

Mekelakeya - half-time state
43% leading36% draw21% trailing
Bahardar - half-time state
8% leading85% draw8% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.64Points per match (1st half)1.08
MekelakeyaBahardar
0.86Goals scored (1st half)0.23
MekelakeyaBahardar
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.31
MekelakeyaBahardar
1.36Average goals (1st half)0.54
MekelakeyaBahardar
57%Clean sheet before half-time85%
MekelakeyaBahardar
50%No goal before half-time77%
MekelakeyaBahardar

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.31
MekelakeyaBahardar
0.29Goals scored (2nd half)0.46
MekelakeyaBahardar
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.38
MekelakeyaBahardar
0.71Average goals (2nd half)0.85
MekelakeyaBahardar
57%Clean sheet after half-time69%
MekelakeyaBahardar
71%No goal after half-time69%
MekelakeyaBahardar

Mekelakeya - second-half results

14% W57% R29% P
23
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding84%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 36%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Bahardar - second-half results

23% W62% R15% P
14
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding288%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mekelakeya - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.20.6
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Bahardar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.40.4
1 goal20%20%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mekelakeya
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
3
2
16-30
7
3
31-45
1
1
46-60
2
2
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Bahardar
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
0
2
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.80
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
41%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mekelakeya

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
152%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.6
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

Bahardar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.56
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.47
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
44% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
44%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

MekelakeyaLigaBahardar
Average goals in match 2.211.71 1.38
Both teams scored 50%42% 31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 36%26% 23%
Clean sheets 36%39% 62%
Goal before half-time 71%57% 23%
Goal after half-time 57%57% 46%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.71
Average goals per match
42%
Both teams scored
26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
0.85
Home goals / match
0.86
Away goals / match
+-1%
Home attack advantage
+-1%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Mekelakeya vs Bahardar?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Mekelakeya 1:2 Bahardar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mekelakeya vs Bahardar?

Mekelakeya score 1.29 goals per game on average and Bahardar 0.69. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 26% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Mekelakeya's matches and 31% of Bahardar's.

What form are Mekelakeya and Bahardar in?

Over the last 5 games Mekelakeya have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Bahardar 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mekelakeya vs Bahardar?

The statistical background for Mekelakeya vs Bahardar — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.