Mekelakeya vs Mebrat Hayl: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mekelakeya played Mebrat Hayl in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 21 December 2025. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Mekelakeya: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match. Mebrat Hayl: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mekelakeya scores 1.50 and concedes 0.90 goals per match. Mebrat Hayl scores 0.78 and concedes 0.44. League average: 1.83 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mekelakeya 60%, Mebrat Hayl 22%. Over 2.5: Mekelakeya 40%, Mebrat Hayl 11%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 30%.

xG, shots and style

Mekelakeya has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.09. Mekelakeya: 9.4 shots per match, Mebrat Hayl: 6.2.

Match halves

Mekelakeya: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.30. Mebrat Hayl: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.78.

Goals by minute

Mekelakeya: 31-45+ (6 goals). Mebrat Hayl: 46-60 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.83 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 30%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
8Shots12
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
4Shots on target3
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
1.52xG1.58
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
3Corners8
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
102Dangerous attacks85
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
10Fouls11
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
0Cards0
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
1.5Goals scored / match0.78
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
0.9Goals conceded / match0.44
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
51%Average possession52%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
3Shots on target / match1.78
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.4Shots per match6.22
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
3Shots on target1.78
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
16%Shot conversion12.5%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
51%Possession52%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
1.46xG for1.09
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
1.12xG against1.07
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl

Shooting quality

Mekelakeya: Efficient finishingMebrat Hayl: Balanced
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
Accuracy (shots on target)32%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.500.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mebrat Hayl is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Mekelakeya · 1.2 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl

Mekelakeya
DDLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
40% W50% R10% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-5-1
1.70 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Mebrat Hayl
DLWDD
Season result split
44% W44% R11% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-1
1.78 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-1
Last 5 away
1-2-1
DWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mekelakeya is 92% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Mekelakeya · 0.78 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl

Mebrat Hayl is 105% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.9 goals / match - Mekelakeya · 0.44 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl

Mekelakeya scoring profile: mixed

Mekelakeya scores in 90% of matches (9 of 10 matches), while Mebrat Hayl keeps a clean sheet in 67% (6 of 9 matches).

Mebrat Hayl scoring profile: mixed

Mebrat Hayl scores in 56% of matches (5 of 9 matches), while Mekelakeya keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 matches).

15Goals scored (season)7
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
9Goals conceded (season)4
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
2.4Average goals in match1.22
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
5Goals scored (last 5)2
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
6Goals conceded (last 5)3
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl

How often they score at least...

90%1 goal56%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
50%2 goals11%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
10%3 goals11%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
0%4 goals0%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal33%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
30%2 goals11%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
0%3 goals0%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
0%4 goals0%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

45%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time0%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
0%BTTS in both halves0%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
10%Scored in both halves0%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS11%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
80%BTTS - last 520%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time22%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
10%Min. 2 goals after half-time22%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mekelakeya is 144% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.9 pts / match - Mekelakeya · 0.78 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl

Mekelakeya - half-time state
50% leading40% draw10% trailing
Mebrat Hayl - half-time state
0% leading78% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.9Points per match (1st half)0.78
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
1Goals scored (1st half)0
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.22
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
1.4Average goals (1st half)0.22
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
60%Clean sheet before half-time78%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
40%No goal before half-time100%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)2
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
0.3Goals scored (2nd half)0.78
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.22
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
0.8Average goals (2nd half)1
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
50%Clean sheet after half-time89%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl
70%No goal after half-time44%
MekelakeyaMebrat Hayl

Mekelakeya - second-half results

20% W40% R40% P
19
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding80%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 40%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mebrat Hayl - second-half results

56% W33% R11% P
7
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.78
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mekelakeya - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.80
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Mebrat Hayl - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.20.8
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mekelakeya
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
2
2
16-30
6
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Mebrat Hayl
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
5
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.81
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
41%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mekelakeya

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
158%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.7
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

Mebrat Hayl

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.63
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
46%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.58
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

MekelakeyaLigaMebrat Hayl
Average goals in match 2.401.83 1.22
Both teams scored 60%45% 22%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%30% 11%
Clean sheets 40%36% 67%
Goal before half-time 70%57% 22%
Goal after half-time 70%60% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.83
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
36%
Clean sheets
0.95
Home goals / match
0.88
Away goals / match
+8%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Mekelakeya vs Mebrat Hayl?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Mekelakeya 0:0 Mebrat Hayl. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mekelakeya vs Mebrat Hayl?

Mekelakeya score 1.50 goals per game on average and Mebrat Hayl 0.78. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Mekelakeya's matches and 22% of Mebrat Hayl's.

What form are Mekelakeya and Mebrat Hayl in?

Over the last 5 games Mekelakeya have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Mebrat Hayl 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mekelakeya vs Mebrat Hayl?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.