Melaka vs Johor Darul Ta'zim: match statistics
Melaka vs Johor Darul Ta'zim: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Melaka played Johor Darul Ta'zim in Super League (Malaysia). The match was played on 28 April 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Melaka: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Johor Darul Ta'zim: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Melaka scores 0.75 and concedes 1.95 goals per match. Johor Darul Ta'zim scores 4.48 and concedes 0.38. League average: 3.21 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Melaka 40%, Johor Darul Ta'zim 29%. Over 2.5: Melaka 55%, Johor Darul Ta'zim 81%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 59%.
xG, shots and style
Johor Darul Ta'zim has higher xG: 2.99 vs 1.17. Melaka: 10.3 shots per match, Johor Darul Ta'zim: 27.7.
Match halves
Melaka: half-time lead 5%, second-half goals 0.60. Johor Darul Ta'zim: half-time lead 76%, second-half goals 2.48.
Goals by minute
Melaka: 76-90+ (5 goals). Johor Darul Ta'zim: 31-45+ (19 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Super League: 3.21 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 59%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 8.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Johor Darul Ta'zim are clear favorites: they have scored 94 goals and conceded only 8 this season, while Melaka have 15 scored and 39 conceded. Away, JDT average 3.6 goals, 64% possession, 23.4 shots (9 on target), whereas Melaka at home record 1.0 goals, 47% possession, 11.4 shots and 3.9 on target — a marked superiority in control and chance volume for the visitors. xG confirms the dominance: JDT have an average away xG of 2.59 versus Melaka’s 1.3 home xG, and a conversion rate of 15% vs 9% suggests the visitors are more efficient at turning chances into goals. Defensively JDT concede 0.1 goals away and keep clean sheets in 90% of away matches, while Melaka concede on average 1.0 goal at home and fail to score in 40% of their home games, increasing risk for the hosts. Additionally, in the last 5 matches JDT have scored 17 goals and averaged 2.0 points per game compared to Melaka’s 5 goals and 1.4 points per game, so I predict a convincing away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I favor the 'no' outcome (No BTTS): Johor Darul Ta'zim has a seasonal clean sheet rate of 90% and concedes only 0.1 goals per match on average, with a seasonal BTTS rate of 10%. Melaka shows offensive potential (xG 3.38, averaging 31.55 shots per match, 12.27 on target) and a seasonal BTTS rate of 45%, but in the last 5 matches the hosts averaged only 1.0 goal scored and 1.2 conceded. Johor in the last 5 matches averaged 3.4 goals scored and 0.8 conceded (17 scored and 4 conceded in five matches), and across the season has 94 goals scored and only 8 conceded, confirming their ability to keep a clean sheet. Considering the league clean sheet rate of 57% with an average total goals of 3.21 and the seasonal BTTS distribution 45% vs 10% (Melaka vs Johor), I assign a 25% probability to BTTS and 75% to No BTTS, hence the selection 'no'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Data analysis indicates an overtly attacking profile for both teams: Melaka has an attacking xG of 3.38 and Johor 2.59, with defensive xG conceded of 0.54 (Melaka) and 0.79 (Johor), yielding projected xG of ~2.09 for Melaka and ~1.57 for Johor (total 3.66). Season-long rates confirm a high goal frequency: Over 1.5 occurred in 100% of Melaka’s matches and 80% of Johor’s, while Over 2.5 sits at 91% (Melaka) and 70% (Johor). In the last 5 matches Johor averages 3.4 goals (17 in 5), Melaka 1.0 (5 goals), and Over 2.5 occurred in 80% and 60% of those runs respectively. Additionally, Johor has 90% clean sheets this season and only 10% of matches with both teams scoring; concurrently 60% of its matches finishing over 2.5 do so without both teams scoring, indicating frequent high-scoring one-sided results. Given the projected xG of 3.66 and consistently high Over 1.5/2.5 percentages, I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (I assess the probability of Over 1.5 at ~95%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time with an away win at full-time (X/2). Johor Darul Ta'zim possess an exceptionally tight defense — conceding on average 0.1 goals per season and keeping a clean sheet in 90% of matches, with a 100% away win rate this season (seasonConcededAVG_away 0.1, seasonCSPercentage_away 90%, winPercentage_away 100%). In their last five matches the visitors averaged 1.4 goals by half-time and led at the break in 40% of cases, whereas Melaka in their last five managed only 0.2 goals by half-time and had 0% half-time leads (last5_scoredAVGHT_overall_away 1.4, last5_leadingAtHTPercentage_overall_away 40%, last5_scoredAVGHT_overall_home 0.2, last5_leadingAtHTPercentage_overall_home 0%). Over the season Melaka generates more chances (xG 3.38 vs 2.59 and 31.55 shots vs 23.4), which increases the probability of a goal before the break, but JDT’s defensive superiority and recent form suggest the visitors are ultimately the more likely winners.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Melaka | Johor Darul Ta'zim | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Johor Darul Ta'zim is 86% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Melaka · 2.6 pts / match - Johor Darul Ta'zim
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Johor Darul Ta'zim is 497% better for: goals scored per match.
0.75 goals / match - Melaka · 4.48 goals / match - Johor Darul Ta'zim
Johor Darul Ta'zim is 413% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.95 goals / match - Melaka · 0.38 goals / match - Johor Darul Ta'zim
Melaka scores in 55% of matches (11 of 20 matches), while Johor Darul Ta'zim keeps a clean sheet in 71% (15 of 21 matches).
Johor Darul Ta'zim scores in 100% of matches (21 of 21 matches), while Melaka keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Melaka
Over / Under - Johor Darul Ta'zim
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Johor Darul Ta'zim is 451% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.45 pts / match - Melaka · 2.48 pts / match - Johor Darul Ta'zim
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Melaka - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 5% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Johor Darul Ta'zim - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 76% of matches and wins 95%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 2.2 | 2.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 0% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +10 | +9 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (19 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +16 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Melaka
Johor Darul Ta'zim
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Melaka | Liga | Johor Darul Ta'zim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.70 | 3.21 | ▲ 4.86 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 47% | ▼ 29% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 55% | 59% | ▲ 81% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 29% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 75% | 77% | ▲ 90% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 65% | 82% | ▲ 95% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Melaka 0 - 0 - 1 Johor Darul Ta'zim. Average goals 8.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Melaka vs Johor Darul Ta'zim?
The Super League match finished Melaka 1:2 Johor Darul Ta'zim. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Melaka vs Johor Darul Ta'zim?
Melaka score 0.75 goals per game on average and Johor Darul Ta'zim 4.48. The Super League average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Melaka's matches and 29% of Johor Darul Ta'zim's.
What form are Melaka and Johor Darul Ta'zim in?
Over the last 5 games Melaka have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Johor Darul Ta'zim 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Melaka vs Johor Darul Ta'zim?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


