Melaka vs Kuching FA: match statistics
Melaka vs Kuching FA: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Melaka played Kuching FA in Super League (Malaysia). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Melaka: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Kuching FA: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Melaka scores 0.73 and concedes 1.86 goals per match. Kuching FA scores 1.86 and concedes 0.59. League average: 3.22 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Melaka 41%, Kuching FA 36%. Over 2.5: Melaka 55%, Kuching FA 41%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Kuching FA has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.17. Melaka: 10.4 shots per match, Kuching FA: 14.1.
Match halves
Melaka: half-time lead 5%, second-half goals 0.59. Kuching FA: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.91.
Goals by minute
Melaka: 61-75 (5 goals). Kuching FA: 61-75 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Super League: 3.22 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kuching FA are the favorites for this match: they sit 3rd in the table with 14 wins this season versus Melaka’s 4 (Melaka are 11th), and Kuching have scored 41 goals across the season compared to the hosts’ 16. Offensively the gap is clear — Melaka average 1.00 goal at home while Kuching score 1.45 on the road; in the last 5 matches the visitors have 10 goals versus Melaka’s 5. Defensively the visitors also have the edge: Melaka have conceded 41 goals this season and concede 1.09 goals per home match, whereas Kuching have only 13 conceded and concede 0.82 on the road. Chance quality and finishing favor Kuching — the visitors register 4.55 shots on target away with a 12% conversion rate, hosts average 3.82 shots on target at home with 9% conversion, and Melaka have failed to score in 36% of home games versus 9% of away matches without a goal for Kuching. Additionally Kuching have a higher xG (1.50 xG For away vs 1.28 xG for Melaka at home) and more points in the last 5 matches (2.2 vs 1.4), so I predict a victory for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict BTTS - Yes because Kuching has an 80% BTTS rate in their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 2.0 goals in those games with xG 1.7. Melaka has only 27% BTTS on the season and keeps 64% clean sheets at home with a season average of 0.36 goals conceded per game, but the home side’s BTTS in the last 5 has risen to 60% and they are recently allowing 1.79 xG against. Season xG shows Melaka creates 1.81 xG per home game versus Kuching’s 1.50 xG, and an average of 5.91 shots on target versus 4.55 plus a conversion rate of 14% versus 12% confirm both teams produce real scoring opportunities. Additionally, Kuching have 41 goals on the season and 10 goals in the last 5 matches, while Melaka have scored 5 goals in their last 5, suggesting an offensive edge for the visitors. Given the strong signal from the last 5 matches (80% vs 60%) and the visitors’ better scoring form, I assign 62% to BTTS 'Yes' and 38% to 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect a total of about 2.85 goals: Melaka ~1.61 and Kuching ~1.24, calculated as the average of home attack xG 1.81 and away conceded xG 1.41 → (1.81+1.41)/2 = 1.61; and away attack xG 1.50 and home conceded xG 0.98 → (1.50+0.98)/2 = 1.24. Using a Poisson distribution with a total of 2.85, the probability of Over 1.5 is about 78% (P(>=2)=77.7%), Over 2.5 about 55% (P(>=3)=54.3%), and Over 3.5 about 32% (P(>=4)=31.9%). Seasonal data support this forecast: Melaka have 73% of matches with over 1.5 goals, Kuching 55%, and both teams have 100% of matches with at least one goal, which increases the chance of at least two goals. Melaka score on average 2.27 goals per game with xG 1.81 and 5.91 shots on target; Kuching record 1.45 goals with xG 1.50 and 4.55 shots on target, so the hosts create more chances and have a higher conversion rate (14% vs 12%). In summary, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (78%); Over 2.5 is moderately likely (55%), and Over 3.5 has low probability (32%), therefore I recommend a bet on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Melaka has a clear second-half advantage: they average 1.36 goals after the break versus Kuching’s 0.45 and concede only 0.09 goals after the break versus 0.55, and they win the second half in 73% of cases (scored_2hg_avg_home 1.36; scored_2hg_avg_away 0.45; conceded_2hg_avg_home 0.09; conceded_2hg_avg_away 0.55; wins_2hg_percentage_home 73.0). Seasonally the home side also dominate offensively: Melaka averages 2.27 goals per match versus Kuching’s 1.45 and posts a higher xG of 1.81 vs 1.50 and more shots on target 5.91 vs 4.55, indicating superior quality of chances (seasonScoredAVG_home 2.27; seasonScoredAVG_away 1.45; xg_for_avg_home 1.81; xg_for_avg_away 1.5; shotsOnTargetAVG_home 5.91; shotsOnTargetAVG_away 4.55). At the same time Kuching score more often before the break — they led at half-time in 55% of away matches and scored 6 goals in minutes 31–45 — so the first half may be balanced or slightly in their favor (leadingAtHTPercentage_away 55.0; goals_scored_min_31_to_45_away 6.0). As a result the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a Melaka win at full-time, hence the HT/FT X/1 receives the highest probability of 39% (with 22% for 1/1 and 15% for X/X).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Melaka | Kuching FA | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kuching FA is 86% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Melaka · 2.6 pts / match - Kuching FA
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kuching FA is 155% better for: goals scored per match.
0.73 goals / match - Melaka · 1.86 goals / match - Kuching FA
Kuching FA is 215% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.86 goals / match - Melaka · 0.59 goals / match - Kuching FA
Melaka scores in 55% of matches (12 of 22 matches), while Kuching FA keeps a clean sheet in 55% (12 of 22 matches).
Kuching FA scores in 91% of matches (20 of 22 matches), while Melaka keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Melaka
Over / Under - Kuching FA
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kuching FA is 324% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.45 pts / match - Melaka · 1.91 pts / match - Kuching FA
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Melaka - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 5% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Kuching FA - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 100% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Melaka
Kuching FA
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Melaka | Liga | Kuching FA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.59 | 3.22 | ▼ 2.45 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 41% | 48% | ▼ 36% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 55% | 60% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 27% | 29% | ▲ 55% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 73% | 78% | ▼ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 64% | 82% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Melaka 0 - 0 - 1 Kuching FA. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Melaka vs Kuching FA?
The Super League match finished Melaka 1:3 Kuching FA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Melaka vs Kuching FA?
Melaka score 0.73 goals per game on average and Kuching FA 1.86. The Super League average is 3.22 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Melaka's matches and 36% of Kuching FA's.
What form are Melaka and Kuching FA in?
Over the last 5 games Melaka have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Kuching FA 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Melaka vs Kuching FA?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


