Iran - Azadegan LeagueShahid Bahonar StadiumData current as of 17 October 2026

Mes Kerman vs Mes Rafsanjan: match statistics

Mes Kerman crest
Mes Kerman
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Mes Rafsanjan crest
Mes Rafsanjan

Mes Kerman vs Mes Rafsanjan: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mes Kerman played Mes Rafsanjan in Azadegan League (Iran). The match was played on 12 October 2026. Venue: Shahid Bahonar Stadium. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Mes Kerman: 0-3-1, 0.75 points/match. Mes Rafsanjan: 2-2-0, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mes Kerman scores 0.50 and concedes 0.75 goals per match. Mes Rafsanjan scores 0.50 and concedes 0.00. League average: 1.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mes Kerman 50%, Mes Rafsanjan 0%. Over 2.5: Mes Kerman 0%, Mes Rafsanjan 0%. League level: BTTS 29%, Over 2.5 24%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Mes Kerman: -1.0 shots per match, Mes Rafsanjan: -1.0.

Match halves

Mes Kerman: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.50. Mes Rafsanjan: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.25.

Goals by minute

Mes Kerman: 61-75 (2 goals). Mes Rafsanjan: 31-45+ (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.59 goals per match, BTTS 29%, Over 2.5 24%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Mes Rafsanjan sit 2nd with 2 wins and 2 draws from four matches, while 13th-placed Mes Kerman are yet to win a game. The visitors’ biggest advantage lies in defence: they have not conceded a goal so far this season, while the hosts have shipped 3 goals in four matches. However, both teams have scored just 2 goals, so Rafsanjan’s attacking output does not justify expecting a high-scoring win. Kerman lost 0:1 at home, while Rafsanjan drew 0:0 in their only listed away match, increasing the likelihood of a draw. Even so, the visitors’ two wins in four matches, compared with none for the hosts, make a narrow pick in favour of Mes Rafsanjan.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal points to at least one team failing to score: BTTS occurred in 0% of Mes Rafsanjan’s away matches and 0% of Mes Kerman’s home matches. The visitors averaged 0.0 goals away from home and scored just 2 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.4 per game. Mes Kerman averaged 0.67 goals at home, although its average was higher over its last 5 matches, at 1.0 goal. Both teams have conceded few goals recently — 0.6 and 0.2 per match, respectively — further making a goal at both ends less likely. Even with BTTS in 40% of the hosts’ last 5 matches, the visitors’ 0% rate over that period and the league BTTS average of 28% support the BTTS - No pick. This means at least one team is expected not to score; it does not necessarily mean a 0-0 draw.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In their last 5 matches, Mes Kerman scored an average of 1.0 goals and conceded 0.6, while Mes Rafsanjan scored 0.4 and conceded 0.2. The visitors’ matches therefore averaged just 0.6 goals, and none of their last 5 went over 2.5 goals; the figure for the hosts was 20%. The league average of 1.53 goals per match and just 22% of games featuring at least 3 goals also point to a low-scoring competition. The forecast of 1.45 total goals provides the strongest support for Under 3.5 goals, although the small sample of recent matches offers no guarantee.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome: Mes Kerman were level at the break in 2 of their 3 home matches, while Mes Rafsanjan did so in their only away match. In the recent matches covered by this analysis, the hosts failed to score before half-time in 4 games, while the visitors kept a clean sheet at the break in 80% of their last 5 matches. After half-time, Mes Kerman have recently averaged 0.5 goals, compared with 0.2 for Mes Rafsanjan, so a home win remains a significant alternative. The strongest signal for a draw at full-time, however, comes from the visitors’ solid defence: over their last 5 matches, they conceded an average of just 0.2 goals, while scoring 0.4 on average. With such low goal numbers and a limited sample of home and away matches, X/X holds a slight edge over X/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
-1Shots-1
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
-1Shots on target-1
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0xG0
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
-1Corners-1
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0Dangerous attacks0
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
-1Fouls-1
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
-1Cards-1
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0.5Goals scored / match0.5
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0.75Goals conceded / match0
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
-1%Average possession-1%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
-1Shots on target / match-1
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

-1Shots per match-1
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
-1Shots on target-1
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
-50%Shot conversion-50%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
-1%Possession-1%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0xG for0
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0xG against0
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan

Shooting quality

Mes Kerman: BalancedMes Rafsanjan: Balanced
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
Accuracy (shots on target)0%0%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.000.00
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mes Rafsanjan is 167% better for: last-5 form.

0.75 pts / match - Mes Kerman · 2 pts / match - Mes Rafsanjan

Mes Kerman
DLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W75% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-3-1
0.75 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-1
0.75 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 0%
Mes Rafsanjan
DDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-0
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mes Kerman scoring profile: more difficult

Mes Kerman scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while Mes Rafsanjan keeps a clean sheet in 100% (4 of 4 matches).

Mes Rafsanjan scoring profile: strong

Mes Rafsanjan scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while Mes Kerman keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

2Goals scored (season)2
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
3Goals conceded (season)0
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
1.25Average goals in match0.5
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
2Goals scored (last 5)2
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
3Goals conceded (last 5)0
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal50%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0%2 goals0%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0%3 goals0%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0%4 goals0%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal0%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0%2 goals0%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0%3 goals0%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0%4 goals0%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

29%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0%Scored in both halves0%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
50%BTTS - last 50%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time25%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time25%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mes Rafsanjan is 500% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.25 pts / match - Mes Kerman · 1.5 pts / match - Mes Rafsanjan

Mes Kerman - half-time state
0% leading25% draw75% trailing
Mes Rafsanjan - half-time state
25% leading75% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.25Points per match (1st half)1.5
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0Goals scored (1st half)0.25
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0.75Average goals (1st half)0.25
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
25%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
100%No goal before half-time75%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.25
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0Goals conceded (2nd half)0
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
0.5Average goals (2nd half)0.25
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
100%Clean sheet after half-time100%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan
50%No goal after half-time75%
Mes KermanMes Rafsanjan

Mes Kerman - second-half results

50% W50% D0% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.25
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.8

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mes Rafsanjan - second-half results

25% W75% D0% L
6
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mes Kerman - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.252.00
Goals scored / match0.00.5
Goals conceded / match0.80.0
Average goals in match0.80.5
1 goal75%50%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet25%100%
No goal100%50%
Goal difference-3+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 25% draw - 75% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Mes Rafsanjan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.501.50
Goals scored / match0.30.3
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.30.3
1 goal25%25%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal75%75%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 25% leading - 75% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 75% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mes Kerman
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
0
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Mes Rafsanjan
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

0.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.3 : 0.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
55%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
25%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
25%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mes Kerman

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.50
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.75
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
59%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Mes Rafsanjan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.50
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
0%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Mes KermanLigaMes Rafsanjan
Average goals in match▼ 1.251.59▼ 0.50
Both teams scored▲ 50%29%▼ 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 0%24%▼ 0%
Clean sheets▼ 25%47%▲ 100%
Goal before half-time▲ 75%50%▼ 25%
Goal after half-time• 50%50%▼ 25%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.59
Average goals per match
29%
Both teams scored
24%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
47%
Clean sheets
0.85
Home goals / match
0.74
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
50%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
50%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Mes Kerman vs Mes Rafsanjan?

The Azadegan League match finished Mes Kerman 0:1 Mes Rafsanjan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mes Kerman vs Mes Rafsanjan?

Mes Kerman score 0.50 goals per game on average and Mes Rafsanjan 0.50. The Azadegan League average is 1.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 24% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Mes Kerman's matches and 0% of Mes Rafsanjan's.

What form are Mes Kerman and Mes Rafsanjan in?

Over the last 5 games Mes Kerman have a 0-3-1 record (0.75 points per game) and Mes Rafsanjan 2-2-0 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mes Kerman vs Mes Rafsanjan?

The statistical background for Mes Kerman vs Mes Rafsanjan — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.