Iran - Azadegan LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

Mes Kerman vs Saipa: match statistics

Mes Kerman crest
Mes Kerman
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Saipa crest
Saipa
130%(4.38)
X40%(2.57)
230%(2.03)

Statistical analysis points to a highly competitive fixture. Mes Kerman displays solid home form, boasting 63% clean sheets and a loss rate of just 13% on home turf, though their offensive output is weak (0.63 goals/match). Saipa holds a superior league position (4th) and an impressive 78% clean sheet rate on the road, yet also suffers from low scoring efficiency (0.67 goals/match). Recent form is comparable: Mes Kerman is on a streak of 4 draws in their last 5 games, while Saipa averages 1.6 points per match. xG metrics are similar (1.32 vs 1.39 for the visitors), and both sides are characterized by a defensive style of play. I anticipate a low-scoring affair and a draw, a scenario supported by the high percentage of stalemates recorded by both teams this season.

Mes Kerman vs Saipa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mes Kerman played Saipa in Azadegan League (Iran). The match was played on 20 January 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Mes Kerman: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Saipa: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mes Kerman scores 0.53 and concedes 0.53 goals per match. Saipa scores 0.82 and concedes 0.41. League average: 1.49 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mes Kerman 24%, Saipa 18%. Over 2.5: Mes Kerman 12%, Saipa 24%. League level: BTTS 32%, Over 2.5 21%.

xG, shots and style

Saipa has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.00. Mes Kerman: 3.8 shots per match, Saipa: 6.9.

Match halves

Mes Kerman: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.24. Saipa: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.35.

Goals by minute

Mes Kerman: 31-45+ (3 goals). Saipa: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.49 goals per match, BTTS 32%, Over 2.5 21%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis points to a highly competitive fixture. Mes Kerman displays solid home form, boasting 63% clean sheets and a loss rate of just 13% on home turf, though their offensive output is weak (0.63 goals/match). Saipa holds a superior league position (4th) and an impressive 78% clean sheet rate on the road, yet also suffers from low scoring efficiency (0.67 goals/match). Recent form is comparable: Mes Kerman is on a streak of 4 draws in their last 5 games, while Saipa averages 1.6 points per match. xG metrics are similar (1.32 vs 1.39 for the visitors), and both sides are characterized by a defensive style of play. I anticipate a low-scoring affair and a draw, a scenario supported by the high percentage of stalemates recorded by both teams this season.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Mes KermanSaipa
-1Shots-1
Mes KermanSaipa
-1Shots on target-1
Mes KermanSaipa
0xG0
Mes KermanSaipa
-1Corners-1
Mes KermanSaipa
0Dangerous attacks0
Mes KermanSaipa
-1Fouls-1
Mes KermanSaipa
-1Cards-1
Mes KermanSaipa

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.53Goals scored / match0.82
Mes KermanSaipa
0.53Goals conceded / match0.41
Mes KermanSaipa
29%Average possession37%
Mes KermanSaipa
1.24Shots on target / match2.71
Mes KermanSaipa

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.76Shots per match6.94
Mes KermanSaipa
1.24Shots on target2.71
Mes KermanSaipa
14.1%Shot conversion11.9%
Mes KermanSaipa
29%Possession37%
Mes KermanSaipa
1xG for1.34
Mes KermanSaipa
1.16xG against0.8
Mes KermanSaipa

Shooting quality

Mes Kerman: Counter-attackingSaipa: Balanced
Mes KermanSaipa
Accuracy (shots on target)33%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.270.19
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Saipa is 43% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Mes Kerman · 2 pts / match - Saipa

Mes Kerman
WDDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
29% W41% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-7-5
1.29 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-1
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
DDWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%
Saipa
WDWLW
Season result split
41% W41% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-7-3
1.65 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 0.93BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Saipa is 55% better for: goals scored per match.

0.53 goals / match - Mes Kerman · 0.82 goals / match - Saipa

Saipa is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.53 goals / match - Mes Kerman · 0.41 goals / match - Saipa

Mes Kerman scoring profile: more difficult

Mes Kerman scores in 47% of matches (8 of 17 matches), while Saipa keeps a clean sheet in 76% (13 of 17 matches).

Saipa scoring profile: mixed

Saipa scores in 59% of matches (10 of 17 matches), while Mes Kerman keeps a clean sheet in 53% (9 of 17 matches).

9Goals scored (season)14
Mes KermanSaipa
9Goals conceded (season)7
Mes KermanSaipa
1.06Average goals in match1.24
Mes KermanSaipa
3Goals scored (last 5)4
Mes KermanSaipa
2Goals conceded (last 5)2
Mes KermanSaipa

How often they score at least...

47%1 goal59%
Mes KermanSaipa
6%2 goals18%
Mes KermanSaipa
0%3 goals6%
Mes KermanSaipa
0%4 goals0%
Mes KermanSaipa

How often they concede at least...

47%1 goal24%
Mes KermanSaipa
6%2 goals18%
Mes KermanSaipa
0%3 goals0%
Mes KermanSaipa
0%4 goals0%
Mes KermanSaipa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time6%
Mes KermanSaipa
0%BTTS in both halves6%
Mes KermanSaipa
6%Scored in both halves12%
Mes KermanSaipa

BTTS and goal count

12%Min. 3 goals and BTTS18%
Mes KermanSaipa
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Mes KermanSaipa
40%BTTS - last 520%
Mes KermanSaipa

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

41%Min. 1 goal before half-time47%
Mes KermanSaipa
6%Min. 2 goals before half-time12%
Mes KermanSaipa
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Mes KermanSaipa

2nd half

47%Min. 1 goal after half-time41%
Mes KermanSaipa
12%Min. 2 goals after half-time18%
Mes KermanSaipa
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Mes KermanSaipa

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Saipa is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.35 pts / match - Mes Kerman · 1.47 pts / match - Saipa

Mes Kerman - half-time state
24% leading65% draw12% trailing
Saipa - half-time state
29% leading59% draw12% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.35Points per match (1st half)1.47
Mes KermanSaipa
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.47
Mes KermanSaipa
0.18Goals conceded (1st half)0.18
Mes KermanSaipa
0.47Average goals (1st half)0.65
Mes KermanSaipa
82%Clean sheet before half-time82%
Mes KermanSaipa
71%No goal before half-time65%
Mes KermanSaipa

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.41
Mes KermanSaipa
0.24Goals scored (2nd half)0.35
Mes KermanSaipa
0.35Goals conceded (2nd half)0.24
Mes KermanSaipa
0.59Average goals (2nd half)0.59
Mes KermanSaipa
65%Clean sheet after half-time82%
Mes KermanSaipa
76%No goal after half-time65%
Mes KermanSaipa

Mes Kerman - second-half results

12% W65% R24% P
23
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Saipa - second-half results

24% W71% R6% P
25
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mes Kerman - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.60.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.80.2
1 goal60%20%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Saipa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mes Kerman
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
3
3
31-45
3
1
46-60
0
3
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Saipa
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
4
0
31-45
3
0
46-60
0
2
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.15
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.5 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
77%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
21%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
28%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mes Kerman

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.63
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

Saipa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
132%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
47%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Mes KermanLigaSaipa
Average goals in match 1.061.49 1.24
Both teams scored 24%32% 18%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 12%21% 24%
Clean sheets 53%45% 76%
Goal before half-time 41%46% 47%
Goal after half-time 47%57% 41%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.49
Average goals per match
32%
Both teams scored
21%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
45%
Clean sheets
0.88
Home goals / match
0.62
Away goals / match
+42%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
46%
1 goal
12%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Mes Kerman 0 - 1 - 0 Saipa. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Saipa
0 : 0
Mes Kerman

FAQ

What was the result of Mes Kerman vs Saipa?

The Azadegan League match finished Mes Kerman 1:0 Saipa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mes Kerman vs Saipa?

Mes Kerman score 0.53 goals per game on average and Saipa 0.82. The Azadegan League average is 1.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 21% of games. Both teams score in 24% of Mes Kerman's matches and 18% of Saipa's.

What form are Mes Kerman and Saipa in?

Over the last 5 games Mes Kerman have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Saipa 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mes Kerman vs Saipa?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mes Kerman vs Saipa: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.