Mes Kerman vs Sanat Naft: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mes Kerman played Sanat Naft in Azadegan League (Iran). The match was played on 20 December 2025. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Mes Kerman: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Sanat Naft: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mes Kerman scores 0.47 and concedes 0.47 goals per match. Sanat Naft scores 0.93 and concedes 0.53. League average: 1.49 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mes Kerman 13%, Sanat Naft 40%. Over 2.5: Mes Kerman 13%, Sanat Naft 27%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 23%.

xG, shots and style

Sanat Naft has higher xG: 1.10 vs 0.95. Mes Kerman: 3.6 shots per match, Sanat Naft: 6.1.

Match halves

Mes Kerman: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.27. Sanat Naft: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Mes Kerman: 46-60 (3 goals). Sanat Naft: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.49 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 23%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
Mes KermanSanat Naft
11Shots11
Mes KermanSanat Naft
5Shots on target8
Mes KermanSanat Naft
1.42xG1.73
Mes KermanSanat Naft
4Corners2
Mes KermanSanat Naft
52Dangerous attacks66
Mes KermanSanat Naft
-1Fouls-1
Mes KermanSanat Naft
-1Cards-1
Mes KermanSanat Naft

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Mes KermanSanat Naft
0.47Goals scored / match0.93
Mes KermanSanat Naft
0.47Goals conceded / match0.53
Mes KermanSanat Naft
30%Average possession35%
Mes KermanSanat Naft
1.13Shots on target / match1.73
Mes KermanSanat Naft

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.6Shots per match6.13
Mes KermanSanat Naft
1.13Shots on target1.73
Mes KermanSanat Naft
13%Shot conversion15.2%
Mes KermanSanat Naft
30%Possession35%
Mes KermanSanat Naft
0.95xG for1.1
Mes KermanSanat Naft
1.09xG against0.88
Mes KermanSanat Naft

Shooting quality

Mes Kerman: Counter-attackingSanat Naft: Counter-attacking
Mes KermanSanat Naft
Accuracy (shots on target)31%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.260.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.54

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sanat Naft is 88% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Mes Kerman · 3 pts / match - Sanat Naft

Mes Kerman
LWWDD
Season result split
33% W33% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-5
1.33 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-1
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
WDDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 0.44BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Sanat Naft
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
47% W40% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-6-2
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.03Opponent xG: 0.98BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sanat Naft is 98% better for: goals scored per match.

0.47 goals / match - Mes Kerman · 0.93 goals / match - Sanat Naft

Mes Kerman is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.47 goals / match - Mes Kerman · 0.53 goals / match - Sanat Naft

Mes Kerman scoring profile: more difficult

Mes Kerman scores in 40% of matches (6 of 15 matches), while Sanat Naft keeps a clean sheet in 53% (8 of 15 matches).

Sanat Naft scoring profile: mixed

Sanat Naft scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Mes Kerman keeps a clean sheet in 60% (9 of 15 matches).

7Goals scored (season)14
Mes KermanSanat Naft
7Goals conceded (season)8
Mes KermanSanat Naft
0.93Average goals in match1.47
Mes KermanSanat Naft
3Goals scored (last 5)7
Mes KermanSanat Naft
2Goals conceded (last 5)2
Mes KermanSanat Naft

How often they score at least...

40%1 goal67%
Mes KermanSanat Naft
7%2 goals20%
Mes KermanSanat Naft
0%3 goals7%
Mes KermanSanat Naft
0%4 goals0%
Mes KermanSanat Naft

How often they concede at least...

40%1 goal47%
Mes KermanSanat Naft
7%2 goals7%
Mes KermanSanat Naft
0%3 goals0%
Mes KermanSanat Naft
0%4 goals0%
Mes KermanSanat Naft

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

30%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time20%
Mes KermanSanat Naft
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Mes KermanSanat Naft
7%Scored in both halves13%
Mes KermanSanat Naft

BTTS and goal count

13%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
Mes KermanSanat Naft
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Mes KermanSanat Naft
20%BTTS - last 540%
Mes KermanSanat Naft

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

33%Min. 1 goal before half-time33%
Mes KermanSanat Naft
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
Mes KermanSanat Naft
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Mes KermanSanat Naft

2nd half

47%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
Mes KermanSanat Naft
13%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
Mes KermanSanat Naft
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
Mes KermanSanat Naft

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mes Kerman is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.27 pts / match - Mes Kerman · 1.07 pts / match - Sanat Naft

Mes Kerman - half-time state
20% leading67% draw13% trailing
Sanat Naft - half-time state
7% leading87% draw7% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.27Points per match (1st half)1.07
Mes KermanSanat Naft
0.2Goals scored (1st half)0.27
Mes KermanSanat Naft
0.13Goals conceded (1st half)0.27
Mes KermanSanat Naft
0.33Average goals (1st half)0.53
Mes KermanSanat Naft
87%Clean sheet before half-time73%
Mes KermanSanat Naft
80%No goal before half-time73%
Mes KermanSanat Naft

After half-time (2nd half)

1.07Points per match (2nd half)1.73
Mes KermanSanat Naft
0.27Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
Mes KermanSanat Naft
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.27
Mes KermanSanat Naft
0.6Average goals (2nd half)0.93
Mes KermanSanat Naft
67%Clean sheet after half-time73%
Mes KermanSanat Naft
73%No goal after half-time47%
Mes KermanSanat Naft

Mes Kerman - second-half results

13% W67% R20% P
19
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sanat Naft - second-half results

40% W53% R7% P
16
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding671%

Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mes Kerman - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.40.6
1 goal40%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Sanat Naft - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.60
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mes Kerman
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
3
1
46-60
0
2
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Sanat Naft
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
2
3
31-45
3
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
5
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.20
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.5 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
81%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
27%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
27%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
20%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mes Kerman

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
54%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Sanat Naft

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
150%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Mes KermanLigaSanat Naft
Average goals in match 0.931.49 1.47
Both teams scored 13%30% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 13%23% 27%
Clean sheets 60%47% 53%
Goal before half-time 33%45% 33%
Goal after half-time 47%57% 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.49
Average goals per match
30%
Both teams scored
23%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
47%
Clean sheets
0.87
Home goals / match
0.62
Away goals / match
+40%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
45%
1 goal
12%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Sanat NaftGoalKhashayar Zebarjad

FAQ

What was the result of Mes Kerman vs Sanat Naft?

The Azadegan League match finished Mes Kerman 1:1 Sanat Naft. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mes Kerman vs Sanat Naft?

Mes Kerman score 0.47 goals per game on average and Sanat Naft 0.93. The Azadegan League average is 1.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 23% of games. Both teams score in 13% of Mes Kerman's matches and 40% of Sanat Naft's.

What form are Mes Kerman and Sanat Naft in?

Over the last 5 games Mes Kerman have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Sanat Naft 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mes Kerman vs Sanat Naft?

The statistical background for Mes Kerman vs Sanat Naft — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.