Mes Rafsanjan vs Kheybar Khorramabad: match statistics
Kheybar Khorramabad displays decidedly better form, earning 1.8 points per game in their last five outings, while Mes Rafsanjan has managed just 0.4 points. The hosts occupy the last place in the table (16th position) with a disastrous record of 1 win and 9 losses, as well as an alarming rate of 71% home matches without scoring. The visitors have not lost any of their last five matches (2 wins, 3 draws) and possess a significantly better goal difference. Kheybar Khorramabad also shows an advantage in away statistics: 43% clean sheets, a better average of shots on target (2.75), and 52% possession. Given the dramatic weakness of the hosts and the solid, unbeaten streak of the visitors, a victory for Kheybar Khorramabad is the most likely scenario, although a draw remains a viable option.
Mes Rafsanjan vs Kheybar Khorramabad: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Mes Rafsanjan played Kheybar Khorramabad in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match was played on 17 January 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Mes Rafsanjan: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Kheybar Khorramabad: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Mes Rafsanjan scores 0.53 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Kheybar Khorramabad scores 0.87 and concedes 0.80. League average: 1.69 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Mes Rafsanjan 27%, Kheybar Khorramabad 47%. Over 2.5: Mes Rafsanjan 27%, Kheybar Khorramabad 27%. League level: BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 24%.
xG, shots and style
Kheybar Khorramabad has higher xG: 1.08 vs 0.87. Mes Rafsanjan: 0.1 shots per match, Kheybar Khorramabad: 1.5.
Match halves
Mes Rafsanjan: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.20. Kheybar Khorramabad: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.40.
Goals by minute
Mes Rafsanjan: 0-15 (2 goals). Kheybar Khorramabad: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.69 goals per match, BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 24%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kheybar Khorramabad displays decidedly better form, earning 1.8 points per game in their last five outings, while Mes Rafsanjan has managed just 0.4 points. The hosts occupy the last place in the table (16th position) with a disastrous record of 1 win and 9 losses, as well as an alarming rate of 71% home matches without scoring. The visitors have not lost any of their last five matches (2 wins, 3 draws) and possess a significantly better goal difference. Kheybar Khorramabad also shows an advantage in away statistics: 43% clean sheets, a better average of shots on target (2.75), and 52% possession. Given the dramatic weakness of the hosts and the solid, unbeaten streak of the visitors, a victory for Kheybar Khorramabad is the most likely scenario, although a draw remains a viable option.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Mes Rafsanjan | Kheybar Khorramabad | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | -1143% | 0% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 12.43 | 0.73 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kheybar Khorramabad is 600% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Mes Rafsanjan · 1.4 pts / match - Kheybar Khorramabad
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kheybar Khorramabad is 64% better for: goals scored per match.
0.53 goals / match - Mes Rafsanjan · 0.87 goals / match - Kheybar Khorramabad
Kheybar Khorramabad is 66% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.33 goals / match - Mes Rafsanjan · 0.8 goals / match - Kheybar Khorramabad
Mes Rafsanjan scores in 33% of matches (5 of 15 matches), while Kheybar Khorramabad keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).
Kheybar Khorramabad scores in 60% of matches (9 of 15 matches), while Mes Rafsanjan keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mes Rafsanjan
Over / Under - Kheybar Khorramabad
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kheybar Khorramabad is 55% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.73 pts / match - Mes Rafsanjan · 1.13 pts / match - Kheybar Khorramabad
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mes Rafsanjan - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 7%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Kheybar Khorramabad - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Mes Rafsanjan
Kheybar Khorramabad
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Mes Rafsanjan | Liga | Kheybar Khorramabad | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 1.87 | 1.69 | • 1.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 27% | 36% | ▲ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 27% | 24% | ▲ 27% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 33% | 43% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 54% | • 53% |
| Goal after half-time | • 60% | 59% | • 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Mes RafsanjanGoalAlireza Afkham Koja Abadi
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Mes Rafsanjan 0 - 0 - 1 Kheybar Khorramabad. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Mes Rafsanjan vs Kheybar Khorramabad?
The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Mes Rafsanjan 2:1 Kheybar Khorramabad. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mes Rafsanjan vs Kheybar Khorramabad?
Mes Rafsanjan score 0.53 goals per game on average and Kheybar Khorramabad 0.87. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 24% of games. Both teams score in 27% of Mes Rafsanjan's matches and 47% of Kheybar Khorramabad's.
What form are Mes Rafsanjan and Kheybar Khorramabad in?
Over the last 5 games Mes Rafsanjan have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Kheybar Khorramabad 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mes Rafsanjan vs Kheybar Khorramabad?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.