Mes Shahr-e Babak vs Nassaji Mazandaran: match statistics
Mes Shahr-e Babak vs Nassaji Mazandaran: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Mes Shahr-e Babak played Nassaji Mazandaran in Azadegan League (Iran). The match was played on 28 November 2025. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Mes Shahr-e Babak: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Nassaji Mazandaran: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Mes Shahr-e Babak scores 0.83 and concedes 0.42 goals per match. Nassaji Mazandaran scores 1.58 and concedes 0.17. League average: 1.46 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Mes Shahr-e Babak 25%, Nassaji Mazandaran 17%. Over 2.5: Mes Shahr-e Babak 17%, Nassaji Mazandaran 33%. League level: BTTS 27%, Over 2.5 21%.
xG, shots and style
Nassaji Mazandaran has higher xG: 2.09 vs 1.18. Mes Shahr-e Babak: 6.3 shots per match, Nassaji Mazandaran: 5.8.
Match halves
Mes Shahr-e Babak: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.50. Nassaji Mazandaran: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Mes Shahr-e Babak: 61-75 (3 goals). Nassaji Mazandaran: 61-75 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Azadegan League: 1.46 goals per match, BTTS 27%, Over 2.5 21%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Mes Shahr-e Babak | Nassaji Mazandaran | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 49% | 46% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.36 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.59 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Nassaji Mazandaran is 8% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Mes Shahr-e Babak · 2.6 pts / match - Nassaji Mazandaran
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nassaji Mazandaran is 90% better for: goals scored per match.
0.83 goals / match - Mes Shahr-e Babak · 1.58 goals / match - Nassaji Mazandaran
Nassaji Mazandaran is 147% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.42 goals / match - Mes Shahr-e Babak · 0.17 goals / match - Nassaji Mazandaran
Mes Shahr-e Babak scores in 58% of matches (7 of 12 matches), while Nassaji Mazandaran keeps a clean sheet in 83% (10 of 12 matches).
Nassaji Mazandaran scores in 75% of matches (9 of 12 matches), while Mes Shahr-e Babak keeps a clean sheet in 58% (7 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mes Shahr-e Babak
Over / Under - Nassaji Mazandaran
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Mes Shahr-e Babak is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.58 pts / match - Mes Shahr-e Babak · 1.25 pts / match - Nassaji Mazandaran
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mes Shahr-e Babak - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Nassaji Mazandaran - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Mes Shahr-e Babak
Nassaji Mazandaran
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Mes Shahr-e Babak | Liga | Nassaji Mazandaran | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.25 | 1.46 | ▲ 1.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 25% | 27% | ▼ 17% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 17% | 21% | ▲ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 58% | 48% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal before half-time | • 42% | 41% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal after half-time | • 58% | 58% | • 58% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Mes Shahr-e BabakGoalAli Vaziri Panah
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Mes Shahr-e Babak vs Nassaji Mazandaran?
The Azadegan League match finished Mes Shahr-e Babak 2:1 Nassaji Mazandaran. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mes Shahr-e Babak vs Nassaji Mazandaran?
Mes Shahr-e Babak score 0.83 goals per game on average and Nassaji Mazandaran 1.58. The Azadegan League average is 1.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 21% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Mes Shahr-e Babak's matches and 17% of Nassaji Mazandaran's.
What form are Mes Shahr-e Babak and Nassaji Mazandaran in?
Over the last 5 games Mes Shahr-e Babak have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Nassaji Mazandaran 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mes Shahr-e Babak vs Nassaji Mazandaran?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.