Iran - Persian Gulf Pro LeagueData current as of 01 November 2026

Mes Shahr-e Babak vs Paykan: match statistics

Mes Shahr-e Babak crest
Mes Shahr-e Babak
1 : 3half-time 0:2
Paykan crest
Paykan

Mes Shahr-e Babak vs Paykan: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mes Shahr-e Babak played Paykan in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match was played on 31 October 2026. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Mes Shahr-e Babak: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Paykan: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mes Shahr-e Babak scores 0.60 and concedes 1.90 goals per match. Paykan scores 0.70 and concedes 1.00. League average: 1.96 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mes Shahr-e Babak 60%, Paykan 30%. Over 2.5: Mes Shahr-e Babak 50%, Paykan 10%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 31%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Mes Shahr-e Babak: -1.0 shots per match, Paykan: -1.0.

Match halves

Mes Shahr-e Babak: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.60. Paykan: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

Mes Shahr-e Babak: 76-90+ (3 goals). Paykan: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.96 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 31%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Mes Shahr-e Babak have failed to win any of their 10 league matches, but have drawn 3 of 5 at home, pointing towards a share of the points. Paykan sit higher in the table, 12th compared to 18th, and have taken 5 points from their last 5 rounds, while the hosts have managed just 1. However, the visitors’ advantage is less convincing away from home: they have lost 4 of their 5 away matches and failed to score in 80% of them. Both teams average 0.6 goals per match at home or away, making it difficult to identify a clear attacking favourite. The hosts have conceded as many as 12 goals in their last 5 matches, but Paykan’s away average of 1.6 goals conceded also gives the visitors little basis for confidence in a win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest case for BTTS - No is that Paykan have failed to score in 80% of their away matches, while Mes Shahr-e Babak have kept a clean sheet in 60% of their home games. The visitors average just 0.6 goals away from home, while the hosts concede 0.4 goals per match at home. Although Paykan concede an average of 1.6 goals away, the hosts score just 0.8 goals at home, so their scoring is far from assured. BTTS - Yes landed in 40% of Mes Shahr-e Babak's home matches and 20% of Paykan's away fixtures, compared with a league average of 39%. The last five matches point to weaker defending from the hosts, who have conceded an average of 2.4 goals, but given the low output of both attacks, it remains more likely that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In Mes Shahr-e Babak matches, the hosts score an average of 0.8 goals, while Paykan average 0.6 goals in their matches, limiting both teams’ scoring potential. However, Mes conceded 12 goals in their last 5 matches, and as many as 80% of those games went over 2.5 goals, making the 2.5 line notably risky. The stronger signal is for Under 3.5 goals: this threshold was not exceeded in any of the included home matches or in 80% of Paykan’s matches. With a league average of 1.97 goals and a forecast of 1.95 total goals, Under 3.5 offers a greater margin of safety than the lower line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A half-time draw is the most likely outcome: it occurred in 3 of the last 5 matches for both teams in their respective home and away games, while they have averaged only 0.4 and 0.2 goals before the break, respectively. A draw at full time is supported by Mes Shahr-e Babak having drawn 4 of 5 home matches and conceded an average of just 0.4 goals in those games. Paykan average 0.6 goals away from home and failed to score in 4 of 5 such matches, making a turnaround in the visitors’ favour less likely. A home win remains a significant alternative, as Paykan have lost 4 of their last 5 away matches, but Mes Shahr-e Babak have not won any of their last 5 matches overall. The hosts’ weaker recent form reduces confidence in the pick, but given the frequent half-time draws and both teams’ low scoring rates, X/X has the strongest overall case.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
-1Shots-1
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
-1Shots on target-1
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
0xG0
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
-1Corners-1
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
0Dangerous attacks0
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
-1Fouls-1
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
-1Cards-1
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
0.6Goals scored / match0.7
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
1.9Goals conceded / match1
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
-1%Average possession-1%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
-1Shots on target / match-1
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

-1Shots per match-1
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
-1Shots on target-1
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
-60%Shot conversion-70%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
-1%Possession-1%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
0xG for0
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
0xG against0
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan

Shooting quality

Mes Shahr-e Babak: BalancedPaykan: Balanced
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
Accuracy (shots on target)0%0%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.000.00
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Paykan is 400% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - Mes Shahr-e Babak · 1 pts / match - Paykan

Mes Shahr-e Babak
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W50% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-5-5
0.50 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-3-2
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
DDLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Paykan
WLDLD
Season result split
20% W40% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-4-4
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-4
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Paykan is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

0.6 goals / match - Mes Shahr-e Babak · 0.7 goals / match - Paykan

Paykan is 90% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.9 goals / match - Mes Shahr-e Babak · 1 goals / match - Paykan

Mes Shahr-e Babak scoring profile: strong

Mes Shahr-e Babak scores in 60% of matches (6 of 10 matches), while Paykan keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).

Paykan scoring profile: strong

Paykan scores in 40% of matches (4 of 10 matches), while Mes Shahr-e Babak keeps a clean sheet in 10% (1 of 10 matches).

6Goals scored (season)7
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
19Goals conceded (season)10
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
2.5Average goals in match1.7
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
3Goals scored (last 5)4
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
12Goals conceded (last 5)5
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal40%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
0%2 goals20%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
0%3 goals10%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
0%4 goals0%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan

How often they concede at least...

90%1 goal70%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
50%2 goals30%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
30%3 goals0%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
20%4 goals0%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
Mes Shahr-e Babak - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.6 of 10 matches
40%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time20%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
0%BTTS in both halves10%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
0%Scored in both halves20%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS10%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
30%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
60%BTTS - last 540%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
10%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time10%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Paykan is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.3 pts / match - Mes Shahr-e Babak · 0.9 pts / match - Paykan

Mes Shahr-e Babak - half-time state
0% leading30% draw70% trailing
Paykan - half-time state
10% leading60% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.3Points per match (1st half)0.9
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
0Goals scored (1st half)0.3
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
0.9Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
0.9Average goals (1st half)0.9
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
30%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
100%No goal before half-time70%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan

After half-time (2nd half)

1.1Points per match (2nd half)1.3
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
1.6Average goals (2nd half)0.8
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
30%Clean sheet after half-time60%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan
40%No goal after half-time70%
Mes Shahr-e BabakPaykan

Mes Shahr-e Babak - second-half results

20% W50% D30% L
3
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.30
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Paykan - second-half results

30% W40% D30% L
9
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mes Shahr-e Babak - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.200.60
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match1.21.2
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-6-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Paykan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mes Shahr-e Babak
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
0
2
16-30
0
5
31-45
2
3
46-60
1
3
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Paykan
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
6
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.10
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
24%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
24%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mes Shahr-e Babak

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.60
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.90
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
53%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
229%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Paykan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.70
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).

Teams vs league

Mes Shahr-e BabakLigaPaykan
Average goals in match▲ 2.501.96▼ 1.70
Both teams scored▲ 60%40%▼ 30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%31%▼ 10%
Clean sheets▼ 10%39%▼ 30%
Goal before half-time▲ 70%55%▲ 60%
Goal after half-time▲ 90%70%▼ 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.96
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.13
Home goals / match
0.83
Away goals / match
+36%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
55%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PaykanGoalFarid AmiriAssist: Ali Mohammad Dehghan
  2. PaykanGoalHojjat AhmadiAssist: Farid Amiri
  3. PaykanGoalHojjat Ahmadi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Mes Shahr-e Babak vs Paykan?

The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Mes Shahr-e Babak 1:3 Paykan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mes Shahr-e Babak vs Paykan?

Mes Shahr-e Babak score 0.60 goals per game on average and Paykan 0.70. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 31% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Mes Shahr-e Babak's matches and 30% of Paykan's.

What form are Mes Shahr-e Babak and Paykan in?

Over the last 5 games Mes Shahr-e Babak have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Paykan 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mes Shahr-e Babak vs Paykan?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.