Mes Soongoun vs Naft Bandar Abbas: match statistics
Mes Soongoun vs Naft Bandar Abbas: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Mes Soongoun played Naft Bandar Abbas in Azadegan League (Iran). The match was played on 21 May 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Mes Soongoun: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Naft Bandar Abbas: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Mes Soongoun scores 0.26 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. Naft Bandar Abbas scores 0.75 and concedes 0.63. League average: 1.51 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Mes Soongoun 4%, Naft Bandar Abbas 46%. Over 2.5: Mes Soongoun 17%, Naft Bandar Abbas 17%. League level: BTTS 32%, Over 2.5 21%.
xG, shots and style
Mes Soongoun has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.04. Mes Soongoun: 4.3 shots per match, Naft Bandar Abbas: 0.8.
Match halves
Mes Soongoun: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.13. Naft Bandar Abbas: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.33.
Goals by minute
Mes Soongoun: 46-60 (3 goals). Naft Bandar Abbas: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Azadegan League: 1.51 goals per match, BTTS 32%, Over 2.5 21%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Mes Soongoun generates significantly more chances at home than Naft — home xG averages 1.92 with 13.83 shots (6.5 on target) per match, versus 1.04 xG and 6.2 shots (1.8 on target) for the visitors. Despite this, the hosts convert very poorly: their home goals average is only 0.42, and in 58% of matches they fail to score, while Naft has a higher shot-to-goal conversion rate (10% vs 4%) and has scored 18 goals this season compared to the hosts’ 7. Defensively the teams are similar — Mes concedes 0.67 goals at home on average, Naft 0.64 away, with clean sheet rates of 50% for the hosts and 45% for the visitors, which favors low-scoring outcomes. Form trends confirm Naft’s propensity for draws: the visitors have drawn 4 of their last 5 matches and have a 55% draw rate away, whereas Mes’s last 5 matches show 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss (1.2 points per match). Given Mes’s advantage in chance creation but their dramatically low efficiency and Naft’s high number of draws, the most likely scenario is a low-scoring draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistics point me to selecting 'no': Mes Soongoun has a season BTTS rate of 54% versus Naft's 36%, while the league average is only 32%. In the last 5 matches both teams rarely traded goals — the home side has 0% BTTS in the last 5, the visitors 20%, and the average goals in the last 5 matches is just 0.2 for both teams. On one hand the hosts generate xG 1.05 and have 4.0 shots on target, but they concede as much as 2.55 xG and have conceded 28 goals this season while scoring only 7; on the other hand Naft has xG 1.04, 18 goals scored and 15 conceded this season, and defends better (xG against 0.82). Additionally the league has a very high clean sheet rate (92%) and season clean sheets of 38% and 45% respectively, which lowers the chances of BTTS despite higher home scoring efficiency (29% vs. 10% for the visitors). In summary I give 65% for 'no' due to the hosts' poor recent scoring form and the generally low BTTS frequency in the league, and 35% for 'yes' as possible but less likely given the hosts' 28 goals conceded and the visitors' 18 goals scored.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I forecast an advantage for Under 2.5: expected goals are 0.84 for Mes Soongoun and 1.21 for Naft Bandar Abbas, totaling 2.05. Both teams’ attacking xG are similar (1.05 vs 1.04), but seasonal stats show both sides rarely exceed 2.5 goals — season Over25 is 23% for the home team and 9% for the away (i.e., 77% and 91% of matches under 2.5 respectively). The league is low-scoring (average 1.51 goals per match), and in the last 5 rounds both teams averaged 1.0 goals scored (gf_last5_home=1.0, gf_last5_away=1.0), which confirms the under trend. Although the xG against Mes Soongoun is very high (2.55), increasing the risk of goals from Naft, the balance of statistics (high share of matches <2.5: 77% and 91%) and the combined xG/form estimate favor Under 2.5 (~66%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X). The home side drew 62% of their home matches, the away side drew 55% of their matches, and half-time draws occurred in 54% of the hosts’ matches and 55% of the visitors’ matches, strongly favoring a draw at the break. Goal averages are low: the hosts score an average of 0.46 goals by half-time versus 0.36 for the guests, and season-long goal averages are 1.46 for the hosts and 1.27 for the visitors, so I expect few decisive outcomes. In the last five matches the away team had as many as 80% draws, while the hosts had 60% draws in their last five, further confirming a tendency toward shared points. xG metrics show similar offensive potential (1.05 xG for the hosts versus 1.04 xG for the guests), with the visitors conceding an average of 0.82 xG to opponents compared with 2.55 xG for the hosts, which suggests that despite creating chances the result is most likely to remain undecided.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Mes Soongoun | Naft Bandar Abbas | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | -25% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.36 | 1.25 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.17 | 0.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Mes Soongoun is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Mes Soongoun · 0.8 pts / match - Naft Bandar Abbas
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Naft Bandar Abbas is 188% better for: goals scored per match.
0.26 goals / match - Mes Soongoun · 0.75 goals / match - Naft Bandar Abbas
Naft Bandar Abbas is 79% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.13 goals / match - Mes Soongoun · 0.63 goals / match - Naft Bandar Abbas
Mes Soongoun scores in 26% of matches (6 of 23 matches), while Naft Bandar Abbas keeps a clean sheet in 42% (10 of 24 matches).
Naft Bandar Abbas scores in 58% of matches (14 of 24 matches), while Mes Soongoun keeps a clean sheet in 43% (10 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mes Soongoun
Over / Under - Naft Bandar Abbas
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Naft Bandar Abbas is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.96 pts / match - Mes Soongoun · 1.42 pts / match - Naft Bandar Abbas
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mes Soongoun - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Naft Bandar Abbas - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 25%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Mes Soongoun
Naft Bandar Abbas
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Mes Soongoun | Liga | Naft Bandar Abbas | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.39 | 1.51 | ▼ 1.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 4% | 32% | ▲ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 17% | 21% | ▼ 17% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 43% | 46% | ▼ 42% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 43% | 46% | ▲ 54% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 52% | 55% | ▲ 58% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Mes Soongoun 0 - 0 - 1 Naft Bandar Abbas. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Mes Soongoun vs Naft Bandar Abbas?
The Azadegan League match finished Mes Soongoun 2:1 Naft Bandar Abbas. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mes Soongoun vs Naft Bandar Abbas?
Mes Soongoun score 0.26 goals per game on average and Naft Bandar Abbas 0.75. The Azadegan League average is 1.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 21% of games. Both teams score in 4% of Mes Soongoun's matches and 46% of Naft Bandar Abbas's.
What form are Mes Soongoun and Naft Bandar Abbas in?
Over the last 5 games Mes Soongoun have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Naft Bandar Abbas 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mes Soongoun vs Naft Bandar Abbas?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mes Soongoun vs Naft Bandar Abbas: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


