Romania - Liga IData current as of 12 September 2026

Metaloglobus vs Csikszereda: match statistics

Metaloglobus crest
Metaloglobus
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Csikszereda crest
Csikszereda

Metaloglobus vs Csikszereda: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Metaloglobus played Csikszereda in Liga I (Romania). The match was played on 13 April 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Metaloglobus: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Csikszereda: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Metaloglobus scores 0.82 and concedes 2.15 goals per match. Csikszereda scores 1.03 and concedes 1.91. League average: 2.56 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Metaloglobus 58%, Csikszereda 58%. Over 2.5: Metaloglobus 64%, Csikszereda 55%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Metaloglobus has higher xG: 1.24 vs 1.22. Metaloglobus: 10.1 shots per match, Csikszereda: 10.8.

Match halves

Metaloglobus: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.48. Csikszereda: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.48.

Goals by minute

Metaloglobus: 46-60 (9 goals). Csikszereda: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga I: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win because Metaloglobus performs better at home: they concede 1.56 goals per home match versus Csikszereda’s 2.59 on the road — a 1.03-goal gap. The hosts register higher xG at home (1.30) compared to the visitors’ away xG (1.08), have superior possession (49% vs 40%) and more average shots (10.75 vs 9.71), giving them an advantage in chance creation. Both teams struggle with finishing: Metaloglobus has scored 27 goals this season (5 in the last 5 matches) and Csikszereda 34 (6 in the last 5), and the percentage of matches without scoring is 44% for the hosts versus 41% for the visitors. In the last 5 fixtures Metaloglobus averaged 1.0 point per game (record 1-2-2), while Csikszereda averaged 1.6 points per game (record 2-2-1), so the visitors are in slightly better form, but Csikszereda’s higher average goals conceded away from home leads me to expect a narrow Metaloglobus victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Statistics strongly indicate BTTS - Yes: Metaloglobus has 69% of matches with both teams scoring, Csikszereda 47%, and in the last 5 meetings both teams registered BTTS in 60% of games. Defenses are vulnerable — Metaloglobus concedes on average 1.19 goals per match (71 conceded this season), while Csikszereda concedes 2.59 goals per match (63 conceded), with recent averages of 1.8 and 1.2 goals conceded in the last 5 matches. Both sides create chances: xG for the home team is 1.36 versus 1.08 for the away team, xG against 1.81 and 1.90, and shots/shots on target are 11.94/4.25 for Metaloglobus and 9.71/3.76 for Csikszereda. Considering shot conversion rates of 11% for the home side and 8% for the away side, and average goals in the last 5 matches of 1.0 (home) and 1.2 (away), the BTTS (Yes) scenario appears more likely, hence the recommendation: Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG model projects 1.63 goals for Metaloglobus and 1.45 for Csikszereda (total 3.08), calculated as the average of team offensive xG and opponent defensive xG: (1.36+1.90)/2 and (1.08+1.81)/2. Seasonally both teams show a strong tendency toward matches with at least 2 goals — Metaloglobus has 88% of games with Over 1.5, Csikszereda 82%, and Over 0.5 occurs in 100% and 94% of their matches respectively. The 2.5 line gives mixed signals: Metaloglobus records 44% Over 2.5, Csikszereda 65% and the league average is 47%, so I estimate a moderate edge for Over 2.5 at ~58%. Over 3.5 looks less likely — seasonal values are 19% (home) and 53% (away), and with an expected total of 3.08 I assign roughly a 33% probability for Over 3.5. Based on this, the strongest and safest signal is Over 1.5 (selection: Over 1.5) due to the high Over 1.5 shares (88%/82%) and the expected 3.08 goals in the match.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Metaloglobus is the favorite: over the season they score an average of 1.31 goals per match versus Csikszereda’s 0.76 and they record 1.56 points per match compared to the visitors’ 0.65. At Half-Time Metaloglobus scores on average 0.75 goals while the opponent concedes an average of 1.35 goals in the first 45 minutes; simultaneously the hosts are level at the break in 56% of matches, and in the last 5 games they were level at Half-Time in 60% of cases. In the second half the hosts perform better in points — 20 points gained in second halves versus 13 for the visitors and a second-half points average of 1.25 versus 0.76 — and the visitors concede a lot of goals over the season (an average of 2.59 goals per match), which increases the likelihood of a turnaround in favor of Metaloglobus after the break. Considering the frequent lead at the break being a draw (56%) and the hosts’ superior effectiveness after Half-Time, the most likely scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a Metaloglobus win at Full-Time (X/1) — 33%, with the alternative 1/1 at 21% and X/X at 16%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
12Shots8
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
2Shots on target3
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
1.29xG0.98
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
8Corners2
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
54Dangerous attacks36
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
14Fouls13
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
3Cards2
MetaloglobusCsikszereda

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

MetaloglobusCsikszereda
0.82Goals scored / match1.03
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
2.15Goals conceded / match1.91
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
46%Average possession41%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
3.39Shots on target / match4
MetaloglobusCsikszereda

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.06Shots per match10.79
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
3.39Shots on target4
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
8.1%Shot conversion9.6%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
46%Possession41%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
1.24xG for1.22
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
1.94xG against1.86
MetaloglobusCsikszereda

Shooting quality

Metaloglobus: BalancedCsikszereda: Balanced
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
Accuracy (shots on target)34%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Csikszereda is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Metaloglobus · 1.6 pts / match - Csikszereda

Metaloglobus
LDDWL
Season result split
9% W21% D70% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-7-23
0.48 pts / match · goal difference -44
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-9
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 0.84Opponent xG: 2.14BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Csikszereda
DWWDL
Season result split
27% W27% D45% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-15
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -29
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-12
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Csikszereda is 26% better for: goals scored per match.

0.82 goals / match - Metaloglobus · 1.03 goals / match - Csikszereda

Csikszereda is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.15 goals / match - Metaloglobus · 1.91 goals / match - Csikszereda

Metaloglobus scoring profile: strong

Metaloglobus scores in 61% of matches (20 of 33 matches), while Csikszereda keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 33 matches).

Csikszereda scoring profile: very strong

Csikszereda scores in 73% of matches (24 of 33 matches), while Metaloglobus keeps a clean sheet in 9% (3 of 33 matches).

27Goals scored (season)34
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
71Goals conceded (season)63
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
2.97Average goals in match2.94
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
5Goals scored (last 5)6
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
9Goals conceded (last 5)6
MetaloglobusCsikszereda

How often they score at least...

61%1 goal73%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
21%2 goals27%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
0%3 goals3%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
0%4 goals0%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda

How often they concede at least...

91%1 goal82%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
67%2 goals55%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
33%3 goals30%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
21%4 goals15%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time30%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
9%BTTS in both halves9%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
9%Scored in both halves15%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
60%BTTS - last 560%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time48%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Csikszereda is 49% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.61 pts / match - Metaloglobus · 0.91 pts / match - Csikszereda

Metaloglobus - half-time state
9% leading33% draw58% trailing
Csikszereda - half-time state
18% leading36% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.61Points per match (1st half)0.91
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.55
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
1.09Goals conceded (1st half)1.03
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
1.42Average goals (1st half)1.58
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
30%Clean sheet before half-time33%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
70%No goal before half-time55%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda

After half-time (2nd half)

0.85Points per match (2nd half)1
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
0.48Goals scored (2nd half)0.48
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
1.06Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
1.55Average goals (2nd half)1.36
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
39%Clean sheet after half-time39%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda
61%No goal after half-time58%
MetaloglobusCsikszereda

Metaloglobus - second-half results

15% W39% D45% L
20
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-25
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-19
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.61
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 9%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Csikszereda - second-half results

18% W45% D36% L
30
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-16
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Metaloglobus - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Csikszereda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Metaloglobus
ScoredConceded
6
12
0-15
3
11
16-30
2
13
31-45
9
6
46-60
3
12
61-75
4
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -13 - late phases are a weakness.

Csikszereda
ScoredConceded
6
9
0-15
4
8
16-30
8
17
31-45
5
6
46-60
6
11
61-75
5
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.96
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-15%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Metaloglobus

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.70
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
57%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
192%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.52
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

Csikszereda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.64
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+13.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
132%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).

Teams vs league

MetaloglobusLigaCsikszereda
Average goals in match 2.972.56 2.94
Both teams scored 58%51% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 64%47% 55%
Clean sheets 9%27% 18%
Goal before half-time 79%69% 82%
Goal after half-time 73%76% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.56
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.45
Home goals / match
1.12
Away goals / match
+29%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CsikszeredaSubstitutionOn: Gustavo dos Santos CabralOff: László Kleinheisler
  2. MetaloglobusYellow cardMike Cestor
  3. CsikszeredaGoalMarton Eppel
  4. CsikszeredaSubstitutionOn: Szabolcs DusinszkiOff: Bence Végh
  5. MetaloglobusSubstitutionOn: Robert Cornel NeacşuOff: Andrei Sava
  6. MetaloglobusYellow cardRobert Cornel Neacşu
  7. MetaloglobusSubstitutionOn: Moses AbbeyOff: Damià Sabater Tous
  8. MetaloglobusSubstitutionOn: Ely Ernesto Lopes FernandesOff: Yassine Zakir
  9. MetaloglobusYellow cardAboubacar Camara
  10. CsikszeredaYellow cardLóránd Pászka
  11. CsikszeredaYellow cardJános Hegedűs

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Metaloglobus 0 - 1 - 1 Csikszereda. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

CS Metaloglobus Bucureşti
0 : 1
AFK Csikszereda Miercurea Ciuc
AFK Csikszereda Miercurea Ciuc
2 : 2
CS Metaloglobus Bucureşti

FAQ

What was the result of Metaloglobus vs Csikszereda?

The Liga I match finished Metaloglobus 0:1 Csikszereda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Metaloglobus and Csikszereda?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Metaloglobus won 0, Csikszereda won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Metaloglobus vs Csikszereda?

Metaloglobus score 0.82 goals per game on average and Csikszereda 1.03. The Liga I average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Metaloglobus's matches and 58% of Csikszereda's.

What form are Metaloglobus and Csikszereda in?

Over the last 5 games Metaloglobus have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Csikszereda 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Metaloglobus vs Csikszereda?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Metaloglobus vs Csikszereda: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.