Metaloglobus vs Csikszereda: match statistics
Metaloglobus vs Csikszereda: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Metaloglobus played Csikszereda in Liga I (Romania). The match was played on 13 April 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Metaloglobus: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Csikszereda: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Metaloglobus scores 0.82 and concedes 2.15 goals per match. Csikszereda scores 1.03 and concedes 1.91. League average: 2.56 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Metaloglobus 58%, Csikszereda 58%. Over 2.5: Metaloglobus 64%, Csikszereda 55%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
Metaloglobus has higher xG: 1.24 vs 1.22. Metaloglobus: 10.1 shots per match, Csikszereda: 10.8.
Match halves
Metaloglobus: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.48. Csikszereda: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.48.
Goals by minute
Metaloglobus: 46-60 (9 goals). Csikszereda: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga I: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win because Metaloglobus performs better at home: they concede 1.56 goals per home match versus Csikszereda’s 2.59 on the road — a 1.03-goal gap. The hosts register higher xG at home (1.30) compared to the visitors’ away xG (1.08), have superior possession (49% vs 40%) and more average shots (10.75 vs 9.71), giving them an advantage in chance creation. Both teams struggle with finishing: Metaloglobus has scored 27 goals this season (5 in the last 5 matches) and Csikszereda 34 (6 in the last 5), and the percentage of matches without scoring is 44% for the hosts versus 41% for the visitors. In the last 5 fixtures Metaloglobus averaged 1.0 point per game (record 1-2-2), while Csikszereda averaged 1.6 points per game (record 2-2-1), so the visitors are in slightly better form, but Csikszereda’s higher average goals conceded away from home leads me to expect a narrow Metaloglobus victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistics strongly indicate BTTS - Yes: Metaloglobus has 69% of matches with both teams scoring, Csikszereda 47%, and in the last 5 meetings both teams registered BTTS in 60% of games. Defenses are vulnerable — Metaloglobus concedes on average 1.19 goals per match (71 conceded this season), while Csikszereda concedes 2.59 goals per match (63 conceded), with recent averages of 1.8 and 1.2 goals conceded in the last 5 matches. Both sides create chances: xG for the home team is 1.36 versus 1.08 for the away team, xG against 1.81 and 1.90, and shots/shots on target are 11.94/4.25 for Metaloglobus and 9.71/3.76 for Csikszereda. Considering shot conversion rates of 11% for the home side and 8% for the away side, and average goals in the last 5 matches of 1.0 (home) and 1.2 (away), the BTTS (Yes) scenario appears more likely, hence the recommendation: Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model projects 1.63 goals for Metaloglobus and 1.45 for Csikszereda (total 3.08), calculated as the average of team offensive xG and opponent defensive xG: (1.36+1.90)/2 and (1.08+1.81)/2. Seasonally both teams show a strong tendency toward matches with at least 2 goals — Metaloglobus has 88% of games with Over 1.5, Csikszereda 82%, and Over 0.5 occurs in 100% and 94% of their matches respectively. The 2.5 line gives mixed signals: Metaloglobus records 44% Over 2.5, Csikszereda 65% and the league average is 47%, so I estimate a moderate edge for Over 2.5 at ~58%. Over 3.5 looks less likely — seasonal values are 19% (home) and 53% (away), and with an expected total of 3.08 I assign roughly a 33% probability for Over 3.5. Based on this, the strongest and safest signal is Over 1.5 (selection: Over 1.5) due to the high Over 1.5 shares (88%/82%) and the expected 3.08 goals in the match.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Metaloglobus is the favorite: over the season they score an average of 1.31 goals per match versus Csikszereda’s 0.76 and they record 1.56 points per match compared to the visitors’ 0.65. At Half-Time Metaloglobus scores on average 0.75 goals while the opponent concedes an average of 1.35 goals in the first 45 minutes; simultaneously the hosts are level at the break in 56% of matches, and in the last 5 games they were level at Half-Time in 60% of cases. In the second half the hosts perform better in points — 20 points gained in second halves versus 13 for the visitors and a second-half points average of 1.25 versus 0.76 — and the visitors concede a lot of goals over the season (an average of 2.59 goals per match), which increases the likelihood of a turnaround in favor of Metaloglobus after the break. Considering the frequent lead at the break being a draw (56%) and the hosts’ superior effectiveness after Half-Time, the most likely scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a Metaloglobus win at Full-Time (X/1) — 33%, with the alternative 1/1 at 21% and X/X at 16%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Metaloglobus | Csikszereda | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Csikszereda is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Metaloglobus · 1.6 pts / match - Csikszereda
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Csikszereda is 26% better for: goals scored per match.
0.82 goals / match - Metaloglobus · 1.03 goals / match - Csikszereda
Csikszereda is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.15 goals / match - Metaloglobus · 1.91 goals / match - Csikszereda
Metaloglobus scores in 61% of matches (20 of 33 matches), while Csikszereda keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 33 matches).
Csikszereda scores in 73% of matches (24 of 33 matches), while Metaloglobus keeps a clean sheet in 9% (3 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Metaloglobus
Over / Under - Csikszereda
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Csikszereda is 49% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.61 pts / match - Metaloglobus · 0.91 pts / match - Csikszereda
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Metaloglobus - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 9%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Csikszereda - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -13 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Metaloglobus
Csikszereda
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).
Teams vs league
| Metaloglobus | Liga | Csikszereda | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.97 | 2.56 | ▲ 2.94 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 58% | 51% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 64% | 47% | ▲ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 9% | 27% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 69% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 76% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Metaloglobus 0 - 1 - 1 Csikszereda. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Metaloglobus vs Csikszereda?
The Liga I match finished Metaloglobus 0:1 Csikszereda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Metaloglobus and Csikszereda?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Metaloglobus won 0, Csikszereda won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Metaloglobus vs Csikszereda?
Metaloglobus score 0.82 goals per game on average and Csikszereda 1.03. The Liga I average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Metaloglobus's matches and 58% of Csikszereda's.
What form are Metaloglobus and Csikszereda in?
Over the last 5 games Metaloglobus have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Csikszereda 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Metaloglobus vs Csikszereda?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Metaloglobus vs Csikszereda: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


