Metaloglobus vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Metaloglobus vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Metaloglobus play CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea in Liga II (Romania). The match date is 26 October 2026.
Current form
Metaloglobus: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Metaloglobus scores 1.10 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea scores 1.00 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.92 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Metaloglobus 60%, CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea 50%. Over 2.5: Metaloglobus 60%, CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea 50%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Metaloglobus has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.24. Metaloglobus: 10.4 shots per match, CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea: 9.4.
Match halves
Metaloglobus: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.80. CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.40.
Goals by minute
Metaloglobus: 61-75 (4 goals). CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea: 46-60 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga II: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Metaloglobus | CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Metaloglobus is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Metaloglobus · 0.6 pts / match - CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Metaloglobus is 10% better for: goals scored per match.
1.1 goals / match - Metaloglobus · 1 goals / match - CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
Metaloglobus scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea keeps a clean sheet in 10% (1 of 10 matches).
CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea scores in 60% of matches (6 of 10 matches), while Metaloglobus keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Metaloglobus
Over / Under - CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea is 63% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.8 pts / match - Metaloglobus · 1.3 pts / match - CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Metaloglobus - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Metaloglobus
CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).
Teams vs league
| Metaloglobus | Liga | CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.60 | 2.92 | ▼ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 54% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 55% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 30% | 25% | ▼ 10% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 77% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 70% | 82% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
When do Metaloglobus and CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea play?
Metaloglobus face CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea on 26 October 2026 in Liga II. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What do the goal statistics show before Metaloglobus vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea?
Metaloglobus score 1.10 goals per game on average and CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea 1.00. The Liga II average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Metaloglobus's matches and 50% of CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea's.
What form are Metaloglobus and CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea in?
Over the last 5 games Metaloglobus have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Metaloglobus vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Metaloglobus vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.