Romania - Liga IData current as of 12 September 2026

Metaloglobus vs UTA Arad: match statistics

Metaloglobus crest
Metaloglobus
2 : 2half-time 1:1
UTA Arad crest
UTA Arad
120%(5.20)
X25%(3.60)
255%(1.64)

UTA Arad displays significantly superior form and quality compared to Metaloglobus, making them the clear favorites for this encounter. The hosts sit 16th in the table with just 2 wins all season, scoring a mere 23 goals while conceding 64. Their home form is disastrous, featuring a 64% loss rate, only 14% wins, and a winless run in their last 5 matches overall. Despite average recent form, UTA Arad boasts considerably better away stats: a 36% away win rate, 10% shot conversion, and an average of 1.21 goals per game. The visitors also lead in xG (1.41 vs 1.32), indicating superior chance creation. Given the vast gap in class and the fact that Metaloglobus loses 50% of their home games without scoring, UTA Arad is expected to secure the victory.

Metaloglobus vs UTA Arad: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Metaloglobus played UTA Arad in Liga I (Romania). The match was played on 7 March 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Metaloglobus: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. UTA Arad: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Metaloglobus scores 0.79 and concedes 2.21 goals per match. UTA Arad scores 1.28 and concedes 1.45. League average: 2.57 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Metaloglobus 59%, UTA Arad 59%. Over 2.5: Metaloglobus 66%, UTA Arad 48%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

UTA Arad has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.29. Metaloglobus: 10.4 shots per match, UTA Arad: 13.5.

Match halves

Metaloglobus: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.45. UTA Arad: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.69.

Goals by minute

Metaloglobus: 46-60 (9 goals). UTA Arad: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga I: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

UTA Arad displays significantly superior form and quality compared to Metaloglobus, making them the clear favorites for this encounter. The hosts sit 16th in the table with just 2 wins all season, scoring a mere 23 goals while conceding 64. Their home form is disastrous, featuring a 64% loss rate, only 14% wins, and a winless run in their last 5 matches overall. Despite average recent form, UTA Arad boasts considerably better away stats: a 36% away win rate, 10% shot conversion, and an average of 1.21 goals per game. The visitors also lead in xG (1.41 vs 1.32), indicating superior chance creation. Given the vast gap in class and the fact that Metaloglobus loses 50% of their home games without scoring, UTA Arad is expected to secure the victory.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
10Shots19
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
3Shots on target4
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
1.22xG1.92
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
7Corners6
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
51Dangerous attacks62
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
9Fouls12
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
3Cards0
MetaloglobusUTA Arad

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

MetaloglobusUTA Arad
0.79Goals scored / match1.28
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
2.21Goals conceded / match1.45
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
47%Average possession46%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
3.59Shots on target / match4.45
MetaloglobusUTA Arad

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.38Shots per match13.52
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
3.59Shots on target4.45
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
7.6%Shot conversion9.4%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
47%Possession46%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
1.29xG for1.51
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
1.9xG against1.58
MetaloglobusUTA Arad

Shooting quality

Metaloglobus: BalancedUTA Arad: Balanced
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
Accuracy (shots on target)35%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Metaloglobus
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
7% W17% D76% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-5-22
0.38 pts / match · goal difference -41
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-9
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
WLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 2.01BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
UTA Arad
LLWDL
Season result split
38% W31% D31% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-9-9
1.45 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-4
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DWWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

UTA Arad is 62% better for: goals scored per match.

0.79 goals / match - Metaloglobus · 1.28 goals / match - UTA Arad

UTA Arad is 52% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.21 goals / match - Metaloglobus · 1.45 goals / match - UTA Arad

Metaloglobus scoring profile: strong

Metaloglobus scores in 59% of matches (17 of 29 matches), while UTA Arad keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 29 matches).

UTA Arad scoring profile: very strong

UTA Arad scores in 76% of matches (22 of 29 matches), while Metaloglobus keeps a clean sheet in 3% (1 of 29 matches).

23Goals scored (season)37
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
64Goals conceded (season)42
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
3Average goals in match2.72
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
2Goals scored (last 5)6
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
11Goals conceded (last 5)10
MetaloglobusUTA Arad

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal76%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
21%2 goals41%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
0%3 goals10%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
0%4 goals0%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad

How often they concede at least...

97%1 goal79%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
69%2 goals38%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
34%3 goals17%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
21%4 goals10%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time28%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
7%BTTS in both halves3%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
7%Scored in both halves28%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
40%BTTS - last 560%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time72%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

UTA Arad is 117% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.59 pts / match - Metaloglobus · 1.28 pts / match - UTA Arad

Metaloglobus - half-time state
10% leading28% draw62% trailing
UTA Arad - half-time state
28% leading45% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.59Points per match (1st half)1.28
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
0.34Goals scored (1st half)0.59
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
1.14Goals conceded (1st half)0.76
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
1.48Average goals (1st half)1.34
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
28%Clean sheet before half-time52%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
69%No goal before half-time48%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad

After half-time (2nd half)

0.79Points per match (2nd half)1.41
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
1.07Goals conceded (2nd half)0.69
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
1.52Average goals (2nd half)1.38
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
38%Clean sheet after half-time45%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad
66%No goal after half-time48%
MetaloglobusUTA Arad

Metaloglobus - second-half results

14% W38% D48% L
17
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-23
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-18
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.59
PPG before half-time
Lead holding70%

Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 7%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

UTA Arad - second-half results

38% W28% D34% L
37
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.28
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Metaloglobus - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.40
Goals scored / match0.40.0
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match1.61.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference-4-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
UTA Arad - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.60
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match2.01.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Metaloglobus
ScoredConceded
5
12
0-15
3
10
16-30
2
11
31-45
9
6
46-60
1
10
61-75
3
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -12 - late phases are a weakness.

UTA Arad
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
6
6
16-30
7
9
31-45
4
6
46-60
5
6
61-75
11
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.87
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-30%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Metaloglobus

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.61
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.81
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.50
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
55%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
194%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

UTA Arad

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).

Teams vs league

MetaloglobusLigaUTA Arad
Average goals in match 3.002.57 2.72
Both teams scored 59%52% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 66%48% 48%
Clean sheets 3%27% 21%
Goal before half-time 83%70% 72%
Goal after half-time 72%76% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.57
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.43
Home goals / match
1.14
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MetaloglobusGoalRobert BădescuAssist: Florin Flavius Purece
  2. MetaloglobusYellow cardDavid Mario Irimia
  3. UTA AradSubstitutionOn: Benjamin Van DurmenOff: Denis Hrezdac
  4. MetaloglobusSubstitutionOn: Giovani-David GhimfusOff: David Mario Irimia
  5. MetaloglobusSubstitutionOn: Stefan VisicOff: Florin Flavius Purece
  6. MetaloglobusYellow cardDamià Sabater Tous
  7. MetaloglobusSubstitutionOn: Martins Toutou MpondoOff: Damià Sabater Tous
  8. UTA AradSubstitutionOn: Andrea PadulaOff: Marinos Tzionis

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Metaloglobus 0 - 0 - 1 UTA Arad. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

AFC UTA Arad
2 : 0
CS Metaloglobus Bucureşti

FAQ

What was the result of Metaloglobus vs UTA Arad?

The Liga I match finished Metaloglobus 2:2 UTA Arad. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Metaloglobus vs UTA Arad?

Metaloglobus score 0.79 goals per game on average and UTA Arad 1.28. The Liga I average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Metaloglobus's matches and 59% of UTA Arad's.

What form are Metaloglobus and UTA Arad in?

Over the last 5 games Metaloglobus have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and UTA Arad 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Metaloglobus vs UTA Arad?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Metaloglobus vs UTA Arad: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.