Romania - Liga IITeren Sintetic Cornel NegoescuData current as of 31 August 2026

Metalul Buzău vs Chindia Târgovişte: match statistics

Metalul Buzău vs Chindia Târgovişte: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Metalul Buzău played Chindia Târgovişte in Liga II (Romania). The match was played on 29 August 2026. Venue: Teren Sintetic Cornel Negoescu. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Metalul Buzău: 2-1-1, 1.75 points/match. Chindia Târgovişte: 2-0-2, 1.50 points/match.

Goal statistics

Metalul Buzău scores 1.00 and concedes 0.75 goals per match. Chindia Târgovişte scores 1.75 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.68 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Metalul Buzău 25%, Chindia Târgovişte 50%. Over 2.5: Metalul Buzău 25%, Chindia Târgovişte 75%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Chindia Târgovişte has higher xG: 1.96 vs 1.47. Metalul Buzău: 11.5 shots per match, Chindia Târgovişte: 16.5.

Match halves

Metalul Buzău: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.75. Chindia Târgovişte: half-time lead 75%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

Metalul Buzău: 31-45+ (1 goals). Chindia Târgovişte: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga II: 2.68 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Metalul Buzău have a clear home advantage: they have won 100% of their matches at home so far, scoring an average of 3 goals per game. The hosts are also highly clinical, converting 43% of their shots, while Chindia turn just 14% of their attempts into goals away from home and fail to score in 50% of such matches. Both teams have identical records across their last five appearances: 3 wins, a draw and a defeat. During that period, Metalul scored 8 goals, while Chindia scored 10. However, the visitors create more chances on the road, averaging 10.5 shots and 5 on target compared with Metalul’s 7 and 3, respectively, so they are genuinely capable of finding the net. Although the hosts allow opponents an xG of 1.73, Chindia concede an even higher 2.20 xG away from home, which, combined with Metalul’s home strength, points towards a narrow home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Metalul Buzău score an average of 2.0 goals at home and have yet to keep a clean sheet, while their average xG is a high 2.63. Chindia have scored an average of 2.0 goals in their last five matches, with an xG of 1.87, while Metalul have conceded 1.0 goal per game over the same period. The hosts average 22.5 shots and 11 shots on target, which is a clear argument against the visitors’ defence, whose average xG conceded stands at 2.20 despite allowing only 0.5 goals per game. Chindia’s last five matches produced BTTS - Yes in 80% of cases, with both teams scoring 10 and 8 goals respectively. Therefore, a goal from each side is more likely than a BTTS - No scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In their last five matches, Metalul Buzău averaged 1.6 goals scored and 1.0 conceded, while Chindia Târgovişte scored 2.0 goals and conceded just 1.0. The combined record of both teams over this period is 18 goals in 10 matches, or 2.8 goals per game, which remains below the 3.5 line. The xG data points to open phases of play, with average attacking xG of 1.52 for the hosts and 1.87 for the visitors, but both teams’ recently solid defensive performances limit the projection to 2.95 goals. Chindia kept a clean sheet in 50% of their away matches so far, and none of those games produced more than 3 goals. Therefore, the strongest signal is Under 3.5: the match has the potential to produce 2-3 goals, but the data does not provide sufficient support for a scenario involving at least four goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Metalul Buzău has a very strong first-half profile at home: they have led at the break in both of their matches so far, scoring an average of 1.0 goal and conceding none. The hosts create significantly more chances, as reflected by an xG of 2.63 compared with Chindia’s 1.30, as well as averages of 22.5 shots and 11 on target, versus the visitors’ 10.5 and 5, respectively. Although Chindia led at half-time in each of their last five matches and did not concede during the first half, their average of goals scored after the break is only 0.8, while they concede as many as 1.0 goal in that period. Metalul averages 1.0 goal after half-time and has conceded just 0.4 goals in the second half across their last five matches, strengthening the scenario of maintaining or extending their lead. Both teams have won 60% of their last five matches, but the hosts’ superiority in chance creation and their perfect record of leading at the break at home support the 1/1 outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
12Shots8
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
4Shots on target4
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
1.49xG1.1
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
7Corners2
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
64Dangerous attacks43
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
6Fouls4
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
0Cards0
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
1Goals scored / match1.75
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
0.75Goals conceded / match1
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
55%Average possession47%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
4.25Shots on target / match8
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.5Shots per match16.5
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
4.25Shots on target8
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
8.7%Shot conversion10.6%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
55%Possession47%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
1.47xG for1.96
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
1.28xG against1.93
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte

Shooting quality

Metalul Buzău: BalancedChindia Târgovişte: Attacking
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
Accuracy (shots on target)37%48%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Metalul Buzău is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.75 pts / match - Metalul Buzău · 1.5 pts / match - Chindia Târgovişte

Metalul Buzău
DWWL
Season result split
50% W25% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 25%
Chindia Târgovişte
LWWL
Season result split
50% W0% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-2
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-2
1.50 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 away
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.96Opponent xG: 1.93BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 75%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chindia Târgovişte is 75% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Metalul Buzău · 1.75 goals / match - Chindia Târgovişte

Metalul Buzău is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.75 goals / match - Metalul Buzău · 1 goals / match - Chindia Târgovişte

Metalul Buzău scoring profile: strong

Metalul Buzău scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while Chindia Târgovişte keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

Chindia Târgovişte scoring profile: strong

Chindia Târgovişte scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Metalul Buzău keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 matches).

4Goals scored (season)7
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
3Goals conceded (season)4
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
1.75Average goals in match2.75
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
4Goals scored (last 5)7
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
3Goals conceded (last 5)4
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal75%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
25%2 goals50%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
25%3 goals50%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
0%4 goals0%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal75%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
25%2 goals25%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
0%3 goals0%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
0%4 goals0%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
Chindia Târgovişte - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.2 of 4 matches
59%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
0%Scored in both halves50%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
25%BTTS - last 550%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chindia Târgovişte is 125% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Metalul Buzău · 2.25 pts / match - Chindia Târgovişte

Metalul Buzău - half-time state
25% leading25% draw50% trailing
Chindia Târgovişte - half-time state
75% leading0% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)2.25
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
0.25Goals scored (1st half)1
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
0.75Average goals (1st half)1.25
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
50%Clean sheet before half-time75%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
75%No goal before half-time25%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per match (2nd half)1.75
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
0.25Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
1Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
75%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte
75%No goal after half-time50%
Metalul BuzăuChindia Târgovişte

Metalul Buzău - second-half results

25% W50% R25% P
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Chindia Târgovişte - second-half results

50% W25% R25% P
9
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 75% of matches and wins 50%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Metalul Buzău - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.25
Goals scored / match0.30.8
Goals conceded / match0.50.3
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal75%50%
2 goals0%25%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet50%75%
No goal75%75%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 25% leading - 25% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 50% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Chindia Târgovişte - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.251.75
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.30.8
Average goals in match1.31.5
1 goal100%75%
2 goals25%50%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet75%50%
No goal25%50%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 75% leading - 0% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 25% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Metalul Buzău
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Chindia Târgovişte
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
84%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+122%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
38%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Metalul Buzău

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.53
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Chindia Târgovişte

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.72
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.93
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
148%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).

Teams vs league

Metalul BuzăuLigaChindia Târgovişte
Average goals in match 1.752.68 2.75
Both teams scored 25%59% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 25%52% 75%
Clean sheets 50%23% 25%
Goal before half-time 75%77% 100%
Goal after half-time 50%82% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.68
Average goals per match
59%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / match
1.18
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Metalul BuzăuGoalValentin Robert Robu
  2. Chindia TârgovişteGoalDaniel Marinel Celea
  3. Chindia TârgovişteGoalCristian Daniel Neguţ

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Metalul Buzău 1 - 0 - 0 Chindia Târgovişte. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Metalul Buzău vs Chindia Târgovişte?

The Liga II match finished Metalul Buzău 1:3 Chindia Târgovişte. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Metalul Buzău vs Chindia Târgovişte?

Metalul Buzău score 1.00 goals per game on average and Chindia Târgovişte 1.75. The Liga II average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Metalul Buzău's matches and 50% of Chindia Târgovişte's.

What form are Metalul Buzău and Chindia Târgovişte in?

Over the last 5 games Metalul Buzău have a 2-1-1 record (1.75 points per game) and Chindia Târgovişte 2-0-2 (1.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Metalul Buzău vs Chindia Târgovişte?

The statistical background for Metalul Buzău vs Chindia Târgovişte — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.