Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 18 October 2026

Metta - LU vs Beitar / Riga Mariners: match statistics

Metta - LU vs Beitar / Riga Mariners: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Metta - LU played Beitar / Riga Mariners in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Final score: 4:0.

Current form

Metta - LU: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Beitar / Riga Mariners: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Metta - LU scores 4.24 and concedes 0.81 goals per match. Beitar / Riga Mariners scores 2.38 and concedes 1.10. League average: 3.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Metta - LU 52%, Beitar / Riga Mariners 67%. Over 2.5: Metta - LU 86%, Beitar / Riga Mariners 71%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 70%.

xG, shots and style

Metta - LU has higher xG: 2.98 vs 1.81. Metta - LU: 19.8 shots per match, Beitar / Riga Mariners: 11.6.

Match halves

Metta - LU: half-time lead 71%, second-half goals 2.00. Beitar / Riga Mariners: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 1.19.

Goals by minute

Metta - LU: 31-45+ (22 goals). Beitar / Riga Mariners: 31-45+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.72 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 70%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Metta - LU are top of the table and have won 90% of their home matches, although Beitar / Riga Mariners have also performed well away, winning 73% of their games. The hosts hold a clear attacking edge: at home, they average 5.8 goals and create chances worth 3.45 xG, while the visitors average 2.36 goals and 1.79 xG away from home. Metta also averages 16 shots on target per home match, compared with the visitors' 6.82 away, pointing to more chances for the hosts. Metta's defence allows just 0.62 xG per home match, whereas the visitors concede 1.39 xG away. Both teams have won 4 of their last 5 matches, but Metta scored 20 goals and conceded 3 in that span, compared with the visitors' record of 16 scored and 8 conceded. The home win is therefore the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams scored in 70% of Metta’s matches and 64% of Beitar’s, and neither side has yet finished a match without scoring. Their attacking averages are similar: the hosts score 2.4 goals per match with an xG of 1.84, while the visitors average 2.36 goals with an xG of 1.79. Recent form also supports BTTS - Yes: Metta scored 20 goals in 5 matches, while Beitar scored 16 and conceded an average of 1.6 goals. The hosts’ defence remains a risk factor for this selection, having conceded only 3 goals over that period. The case for both teams to score is therefore clear, but not overwhelming.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Metta average 2.4 goals per match, while Beitar / Riga Mariners average 2.36; over their last five games, those averages have risen to 4.0 and 3.2, respectively. The quality of chances also points to goals: season xG stands at 1.84 for the hosts and 1.79 for the visitors, and both teams have scored in every match they have played so far. Over 1.5 goals has landed in 90% of Metta’s matches and 91% of the visitors’ matches, making it better supported by the data than Over 2.5 goals, which has landed in 60% and 82% of their games, respectively. Although their recent scoring form suggests the potential for a high-scoring game, the hosts concede an average of just 1.0 goal, so Over 1.5 goals is a safer pick than the higher lines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is Metta-LU leading at the break and winning after 90 minutes, although the edge is not clear-cut. The hosts have led at half-time in 56% of their matches so far and have not been trailing at the break in any of their last five; however, the visitors have led after the first half in 64% of their matches, so their strong start remains a genuine threat. Metta’s second-half performance supports the likelihood of them holding on to a favorable result: they have won the second half in 78% of matches, compared with 45% for their opponents. In their last five games, the hosts have scored an average of 4.0 goals and conceded 0.6, while the visitors have scored 3.2 and conceded 1.6, further supporting a Metta win at full-time. A draw at half-time followed by a home win is also possible, as Metta were level at the break in three of their last five matches.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

3 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
23Shots15
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
9Shots on target6
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
2.53xG1.75
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
5Corners7
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
64Dangerous attacks53
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
20Fouls5
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
0Cards0
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
4.24Goals scored / match2.38
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
0.81Goals conceded / match1.1
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
50%Average possession47%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
10.52Shots on target / match5.57
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

19.81Shots per match11.57
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
10.52Shots on target5.57
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
21.4%Shot conversion20.6%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
50%Possession47%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
2.98xG for1.81
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
0.76xG against1.28
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners

Shooting quality

Metta - LU: AttackingBeitar / Riga Mariners: Counter-attacking
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
Accuracy (shots on target)53%48%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Metta - LU is 8% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Metta - LU · 2.4 pts / match - Beitar / Riga Mariners

Metta - LU
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
81% W14% D5% L
Season (W-D-L)
17-3-1
2.57 pts / match · goal difference +72
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-0-1
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 4.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 2.83Opponent xG: 1.00BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Beitar / Riga Mariners
WWWLW
Season result split
67% W24% D10% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-5-2
2.24 pts / match · goal difference +27
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-1-2
Last 5 away
3-0-2
LWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.91Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Metta - LU is 78% better for: goals scored per match.

4.24 goals / match - Metta - LU · 2.38 goals / match - Beitar / Riga Mariners

Metta - LU is 36% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.81 goals / match - Metta - LU · 1.1 goals / match - Beitar / Riga Mariners

Metta - LU scoring profile: very strong

Metta - LU scores in 100% of matches (21 of 21 matches), while Beitar / Riga Mariners keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 matches).

Beitar / Riga Mariners scoring profile: very strong

Beitar / Riga Mariners scores in 100% of matches (21 of 21 matches), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 48% (10 of 21 matches).

89Goals scored (season)50
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
17Goals conceded (season)23
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
5.05Average goals in match3.48
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
20Goals scored (last 5)16
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
3Goals conceded (last 5)8
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
90%2 goals71%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
67%3 goals43%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
43%4 goals19%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners

How often they concede at least...

52%1 goal67%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
24%2 goals33%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
5%3 goals5%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
0%4 goals5%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

67%
Beitar / Riga Mariners - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 21 matches
64%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time24%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
0%BTTS in both halves5%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
67%Scored in both halves43%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
33%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
40%BTTS - last 580%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
52%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
38%Min. 3 goals before half-time29%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
76%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
52%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Metta - LU is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.38 pts / match - Metta - LU · 1.9 pts / match - Beitar / Riga Mariners

Metta - LU - half-time state
71% leading24% draw5% trailing
Beitar / Riga Mariners - half-time state
57% leading19% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.38Points per match (1st half)1.9
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
2.14Goals scored (1st half)1.1
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
0.24Goals conceded (1st half)0.48
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
2.38Average goals (1st half)1.57
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
76%Clean sheet before half-time62%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
24%No goal before half-time29%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners

After half-time (2nd half)

2.19Points per match (2nd half)1.9
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
2Goals scored (2nd half)1.19
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
0.48Goals conceded (2nd half)0.52
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
2.48Average goals (2nd half)1.71
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
67%Clean sheet after half-time57%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners
14%No goal after half-time33%
Metta - LUBeitar / Riga Mariners

Metta - LU - second-half results

67% W19% D14% L
50
Half-time points
45
Half-time goals
+40
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+32
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 71% of matches and wins 81%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Beitar / Riga Mariners - second-half results

57% W19% D24% L
40
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding118%

Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Metta - LU - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.40
Goals scored / match1.22.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.63.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+4+13
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
Beitar / Riga Mariners - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.80
Goals scored / match1.81.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match2.62.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals80%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal0%40%
Goal difference+5+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 9

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Metta - LU
ScoredConceded
13
3
0-15
12
2
16-30
22
2
31-45
14
6
46-60
12
1
61-75
16
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (22 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +13 - wins late phases.

Beitar / Riga Mariners
ScoredConceded
9
5
0-15
3
3
16-30
13
4
31-45
5
5
46-60
11
4
61-75
9
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.26
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.7 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Metta - LU

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+2.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
207%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
49%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Beitar / Riga Mariners

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.75
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.57
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
143%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
54%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Metta - LULigaBeitar / Riga Mariners
Average goals in match▲ 5.053.72▼ 3.48
Both teams scored▼ 52%64%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 86%70%• 71%
Clean sheets▲ 48%20%▲ 33%
Goal before half-time▲ 81%77%▲ 86%
Goal after half-time▲ 90%83%▲ 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.72
Average goals per match
64%
Both teams scored
70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
2.05
Home goals / match
1.67
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Rūdolfs Kļavinskis⚽ 1
—Suleiman AbdulraheemA 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Metta - LUGoalRūdolfs Kļavinskis
  2. Metta - LUAssistSuleiman Abdulraheem

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Metta - LU 0 - 1 - 0 Beitar / Riga Mariners. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Beitar / Riga Mariners
2 : 2
Metta - LU

FAQ

What was the result of Metta - LU vs Beitar / Riga Mariners?

The 1. Liga match finished Metta - LU 4:0 Beitar / Riga Mariners. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Metta - LU vs Beitar / Riga Mariners?

Metta - LU score 4.24 goals per game on average and Beitar / Riga Mariners 2.38. The 1. Liga average is 3.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Metta - LU's matches and 67% of Beitar / Riga Mariners's.

What form are Metta - LU and Beitar / Riga Mariners in?

Over the last 5 games Metta - LU have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Beitar / Riga Mariners 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Metta - LU vs Beitar / Riga Mariners?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Metta - LU vs Beitar / Riga Mariners: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.