Metta - LU vs Rēzekne / BJSS: match statistics
Metta - LU vs Rēzekne / BJSS: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Metta - LU played Rēzekne / BJSS in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 19 April 2026. Final score: 5:0.
Current form
Metta - LU: 3-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Rēzekne / BJSS: 0-0-3, 0.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Metta - LU scores 2.67 and concedes 0.33 goals per match. Rēzekne / BJSS scores 0.33 and concedes 4.00. League average: 3.42 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Metta - LU 33%, Rēzekne / BJSS 33%. Over 2.5: Metta - LU 67%, Rēzekne / BJSS 67%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 69%.
xG, shots and style
Metta - LU has higher xG: 2.78 vs 0.69. Metta - LU: 21.3 shots per match, Rēzekne / BJSS: 2.7.
Match halves
Metta - LU: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 1.33. Rēzekne / BJSS: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00.
Goals by minute
Metta - LU: 0-15 (2 goals). Rēzekne / BJSS: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 3.42 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 69%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Metta has a clear offensive advantage and control of the game: at home they average 22 shots per match with 16 on target and score on average 2.00 goals per match with xG 3.03. Rēzekne / BJSS away produce only 4 shots with about 1 on target, average 0.00 goals per match and xG 0.54, indicating a lack of quality chances. Defensively the hosts also dominate — Metta concedes on average 0.00 goals at home and has 100% clean sheets, while the visitors concede on average 4.00 goals away and have no clean sheets or away wins. In the last 5 matches Metta scored 13 goals and recorded 4 wins and 1 draw (2.6 points per match), whereas Rēzekne / BJSS conceded 18 goals in their last five fixtures and have 0 wins and 0.2 points per match. Based on these numbers (xG 3.03 vs 0.54, average goals 2.00 vs 0.00, shots 22:4 and concession differential 0.00 vs 4.00) I predict a convincing home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Despite low season scoring averages (0.5 and 0.0 goals per match), the last 5 fixtures show an uptick – Metta have scored 13 goals in 5 matches (2.6 avg), and Rēzekne 6 goals in 5 matches (1.2 avg), increasing the likelihood of BTTS - Yes. Both sides have poor defensive season stats (conceding 4.0 goals per match each), and Rēzekne conceded 18 goals in their last 5 matches (3.6 avg), so the probability of either home or away scoring is high. The league BTTS rate is 62%, and BTTS in the last 5 matches stands at 60% for both teams, a strong signal consistent with current form. Additionally, recent xG is 2.31 for Metta and 1.84 for Rēzekne, and Metta averages 2.0 on-target shots versus 1.0 for the visitors, which supports a
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate Metta - LU will generate approximately 1.68 xG (average of attack xG 0.83 and opponent defense xG 2.53), and Rēzekne/BJSS about 1.42 xG (average of attack xG 0.54 and opponent defense xG 2.30), yielding ~3.10 expected goals in total. In the last 5 matches Metta scored 13 goals (2.6 per match), while Rēzekne scored 6 goals (1.2) and conceded 18 goals (3.6 per match), indicating high defensive vulnerability and result volatility. The league averages 3.62 goals per match, the share of Over 2.5 games is 76%, and both teams have Over2.5 in 80% of their last 5 games, so league and form data reinforce a high-scoring scenario. A Poisson model with lambda=3.10 gives Over1.5 ≈82% and Over2.5 ≈60%, but accounting for a season-long 100% Over1.5 for both teams and the league/last5 indicators I adjust the estimates upward to Over1.5=92% and Over2.5=72%. Therefore the strongest signal from the data is a play on Over 2.5 (the 'over' side), since the expected ~3.10 goals and the high Over2.5 share in the league and recent form provide the greatest edge.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Metta - LU has a clear advantage in form and results: in the last 5 matches the hosts won 4 of 5 (80% wins) and held a lead at the break in 4 of 5 games (80% leads at the break), whereas Rēzekne/BJSS has 0% wins and 80% losses in their last 5. The hosts average 1.4 goals by half-time in the last 5 matches (1.4 vs 0.25 for the visitors), which increases Metta’s chances of leading after 45 minutes. Additionally, Metta posts higher xG (0.83 vs 0.54) and more shots on target (2.0 vs 1.0), and in second halves they record 80% wins in the last five matches and concede on average 0.2 goals after the break versus 2.25 for the visitors. The away side hardly scores this season (an average of 0.0 goals season-to-date for the visitors) and in the last 5 matches they register only 0.25 goals by half-time, so their chances of a turnaround are low. Based on these figures the most likely scenario is Metta leading at half-time and the hosts winning (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Metta - LU | Rēzekne / BJSS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 53% | 25% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.26 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.49 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Metta - LU is 709% better for: goals scored per match.
2.67 goals / match - Metta - LU · 0.33 goals / match - Rēzekne / BJSS
Metta - LU is 1112% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.33 goals / match - Metta - LU · 4 goals / match - Rēzekne / BJSS
Metta - LU scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Rēzekne / BJSS keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).
Rēzekne / BJSS scores in 33% of matches (1 of 3 matches), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Metta - LU
Over / Under - Rēzekne / BJSS
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Metta - LU is 348% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
3 pts / match - Metta - LU · 0.67 pts / match - Rēzekne / BJSS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Metta - LU - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Rēzekne / BJSS - second-half results
Concedes 1.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 3.00 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.7 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 100% |
| No goal | 0% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.67 | 0.33 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.3 | 1.7 |
| Average goals in match | 0.3 | 1.7 |
| 1 goal | 33% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 67% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 33% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Metta - LU
Rēzekne / BJSS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Metta - LU | Liga | Rēzekne / BJSS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.00 | 3.42 | ▲ 4.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 62% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 67% | 69% | ▼ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 67% | 23% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 77% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 81% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Metta - LU vs Rēzekne / BJSS?
The 1. Liga match finished Metta - LU 5:0 Rēzekne / BJSS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Metta - LU vs Rēzekne / BJSS?
Metta - LU score 2.67 goals per game on average and Rēzekne / BJSS 0.33. The 1. Liga average is 3.42 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Metta - LU's matches and 33% of Rēzekne / BJSS's.
What form are Metta - LU and Rēzekne / BJSS in?
Over the last 5 games Metta - LU have a 3-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Rēzekne / BJSS 0-0-3 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Metta - LU vs Rēzekne / BJSS?
The statistical background for Metta - LU vs Rēzekne / BJSS — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


