Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 06 September 2026

Metta - LU vs Super Nova II: match statistics

Metta - LU crest
Metta - LU
7 : 3half-time 5:0
Super Nova II crest
Super Nova II

Metta - LU vs Super Nova II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Metta - LU played Super Nova II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 13 June 2026. Final score: 7:3.

Current form

Metta - LU: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Super Nova II: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Metta - LU scores 3.22 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. Super Nova II scores 1.33 and concedes 0.89. League average: 3.40 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Metta - LU 44%, Super Nova II 56%. Over 2.5: Metta - LU 78%, Super Nova II 33%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 68%.

xG, shots and style

Metta - LU has higher xG: 2.98 vs 1.34. Metta - LU: 20.9 shots per match, Super Nova II: 8.8.

Match halves

Metta - LU: half-time lead 78%, second-half goals 1.33. Super Nova II: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Metta - LU: 16-30 (6 goals). Super Nova II: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.40 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 68%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the home win: Metta - LU are 1st in the home standings, win 80% of home matches and average 4.0 goals per home game (29 goals this season), while Super Nova II have 12 goals this season and score 1.33 goals per away match. The hosts average 27.4 shots and 15.6 shots on target at home versus 11.33 shots and 5.0 shots on target for the visitors, and Metta’s home xG is 3.39 versus 1.52 xG for the visitors on the road, indicating a clear advantage in the quality of chances. Defensively Metta concede 0.6 goals per home game on average and have 60% clean sheets, whereas Super Nova II concede 0.67 goals away and have only 33% clean sheets, so the hosts’ defensive edge is also evident. Additionally, in the last 5 matches Metta scored 14 goals with a 3-1-1 record, while the visitors scored 5 goals with a 2-1-2 record, confirming the hosts’ superior form and efficiency.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal for BTTS is the high league and seasonal levels: the league has 63% BTTS, and seasonal rates are 50% for Metta and 67% for Super Nova II, which increases the likelihood of Both Teams To Score. In the last 5 matches Metta had BTTS in 60% and scored 14 goals (2.8 per match) while conceding 5 (1.0), whereas Super Nova II only 20% BTTS, with 5 goals (1.0) and 4 conceded (0.8), indicating Metta is more offensively active. Seasonal xG is 1.23 for Metta versus 1.52 for Super Nova II, and xG against is 1.40 vs 1.46, meaning both teams create and concede around 1.2–1.5 xG per match. Additionally, shots on target 3.2 (Metta) vs 5.0 (Super Nova II) and seasonal clean sheets 33% for both teams suggest clean sheets are not the norm; given the league average of 3.45 goals per match, I assign BTTS - Yes 68% and recommend a Both Teams To Score bet.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Calculated expected goals are Metta 1.35 and Super Nova II 1.46, total 2.81, using average offensive xG and xG against (1.23 vs 1.46 for the home side; 1.52 vs 1.40 for the away). Metta scored 14 goals in the last 5 matches (2.8 per game) and has last5 xG 3.0, while Super Nova II scored 5 goals in the last 5 (1.0 per game) and has last5 xG 1.44, showing Metta’s recent offensive edge. The league averages 3.45 goals per match and 69% of matches are Over 2.5, and Metta records 80% Over 2.5 in the last 5 whereas Super Nova II has only 20% in the last 5 and 0% on the season, which gives moderate support for Over 2.5 (estimated Over 2.5 ~53%). Considering the expected 2.81 goals and the fact that Super Nova II’s matches have exceeded 1.5 goals 100% on the season, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 with an estimated probability ~77% (vs 23% Under). Consequently I recommend betting Over 1.5 as the best line; Over 2.5 can be considered as a secondary option.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Metta - LU has a clear advantage in the first half: the home side led at the break in 3 of their 6 matches to date (50%) and were in front at half-time in 75% of their last 5 games, with an average goals at half-time of 0.83 versus 0.33 for Super Nova II. Additionally, Metta scored 3 goals in minutes 46–60 while Super Nova II scored none in that interval (3 vs 0), indicating the hosts’ propensity to extend their lead after the break. The visitors, however, generate slightly higher xG (1.52 vs 1.23) and have more shots on target (5.0 vs 3.2), and their draw rate is 67%, so they have a realistic chance of leveling in the second half. Considering Metta’s HT dominance and ability to strike early after the restart, the most likely scenario is 1/1 (45%), with 1/X at 13% and X/X at 15% — other outcomes carry smaller, single-digit percentages due to the rarity of the hosts surrendering a lead at the break.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

5 : 0
1st half
2 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

65Possession (%)35
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
27Shots10
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
17Shots on target6
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
3.45xG1.33
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
4Corners5
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
78Dangerous attacks38
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
12Fouls13
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
0Cards0
Metta - LUSuper Nova II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Metta - LUSuper Nova II
3.22Goals scored / match1.33
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
0.67Goals conceded / match0.89
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
52%Average possession44%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
11.11Shots on target / match3.33
Metta - LUSuper Nova II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

20.89Shots per match8.78
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
11.11Shots on target3.33
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
15.4%Shot conversion15.2%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
52%Possession44%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
2.98xG for1.34
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
0.67xG against1.42
Metta - LUSuper Nova II

Shooting quality

Metta - LU: AttackingSuper Nova II: Counter-attacking
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
Accuracy (shots on target)53%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Metta - LU is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Metta - LU · 1.4 pts / match - Super Nova II

Metta - LU
WLWWD
Season result split
78% W11% R11% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-1-1
2.44 pts / match · goal difference +23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-0-1
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 2.71Opponent xG: 0.71BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Super Nova II
LLWWD
Season result split
44% W33% R22% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-2
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-0
Last 5 away
1-2-0
DDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Metta - LU is 142% better for: goals scored per match.

3.22 goals / match - Metta - LU · 1.33 goals / match - Super Nova II

Metta - LU is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.67 goals / match - Metta - LU · 0.89 goals / match - Super Nova II

Metta - LU scoring profile: very strong

Metta - LU scores in 100% of matches (9 of 9 matches), while Super Nova II keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 matches).

Super Nova II scoring profile: mixed

Super Nova II scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 56% (5 of 9 matches).

29Goals scored (season)12
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
6Goals conceded (season)8
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
3.89Average goals in match2.22
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
16Goals scored (last 5)5
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
Metta - LUSuper Nova II

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal78%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
78%2 goals44%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
56%3 goals11%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
33%4 goals0%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II

How often they concede at least...

44%1 goal67%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
22%2 goals11%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
0%3 goals11%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
0%4 goals0%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time11%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
67%Scored in both halves22%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
33%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
60%BTTS - last 520%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time56%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time11%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Metta - LU is 35% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.56 pts / match - Metta - LU · 1.89 pts / match - Super Nova II

Metta - LU - half-time state
78% leading22% draw0% trailing
Super Nova II - half-time state
44% leading56% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.56Points per match (1st half)1.89
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
1.67Goals scored (1st half)0.67
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
0.11Goals conceded (1st half)0.22
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
1.78Average goals (1st half)0.89
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
89%Clean sheet before half-time89%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
22%No goal before half-time44%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)1.11
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
1.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
1.67Average goals (2nd half)1.33
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
78%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II
22%No goal after half-time56%
Metta - LUSuper Nova II

Metta - LU - second-half results

56% W33% R11% P
23
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+14
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 78% of matches and wins 78%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Super Nova II - second-half results

22% W44% R33% P
17
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.89
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Metta - LU - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.20
Goals scored / match1.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+9+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 9
Super Nova II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Metta - LU
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
6
1
16-30
6
0
31-45
2
3
46-60
4
0
61-75
6
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Super Nova II
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
3
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
3
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.06
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.1 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
78%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Metta - LU

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+2.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
169%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
45%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Super Nova II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.53
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
47%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Metta - LULigaSuper Nova II
Average goals in match 3.893.40 2.22
Both teams scored 44%62% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 78%68% 33%
Clean sheets 56%23% 33%
Goal before half-time 78%67% 56%
Goal after half-time 78%83% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.40
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.90
Home goals / match
1.49
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
62%
2 goals
38%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Kristaps Maksimovs⚽ 1
Kristers Oto Augusts⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Metta - LUGoalKevins Cēsnieks
  2. Metta - LUGoalSadiq Saleh
  3. Metta - LUGoalSadiq Saleh
  4. Super Nova IIGoalKristaps Maksimovs
  5. Super Nova IIGoalKristers Oto Augusts
  6. Metta - LUGoalSadiq Saleh

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Metta - LU vs Super Nova II?

The 1. Liga match finished Metta - LU 7:3 Super Nova II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Metta - LU vs Super Nova II?

Metta - LU score 3.22 goals per game on average and Super Nova II 1.33. The 1. Liga average is 3.40 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Metta - LU's matches and 56% of Super Nova II's.

What form are Metta - LU and Super Nova II in?

Over the last 5 games Metta - LU have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Super Nova II 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Metta - LU vs Super Nova II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.