Miami FC II vs Brooklyn FC: match statistics
Miami FC II vs Brooklyn FC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Miami FC II played Brooklyn FC in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 3:2.
Current form
Miami FC II: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Brooklyn FC: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Miami FC II scores 1.00 and concedes 1.43 goals per match. Brooklyn FC scores 0.86 and concedes 1.43. League average: 2.65 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Miami FC II 43%, Brooklyn FC 29%. Over 2.5: Miami FC II 57%, Brooklyn FC 57%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Brooklyn FC has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.39. Miami FC II: 11.6 shots per match, Brooklyn FC: 11.4.
Match halves
Miami FC II: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.57. Brooklyn FC: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.29.
Goals by minute
Miami FC II: 46-60 (3 goals). Brooklyn FC: 16-30 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.65 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Miami FC II holds a clear edge heading into this match: at home they average 0.67 goals per game with 11.33 shots and 4 SOT, while Brooklyn FC averages 0.00 goals on the road with only 2.5 SOT. xG supports the gap — Miami posts 1.34 average xG in home matches versus Brooklyn's 1.12 xG away, while Brooklyn’s opponents generate 1.91 xG against them on the road compared to 1.55 xG against Miami. Defensively the visitors are significantly worse: Brooklyn concedes 3.00 goals on average away and has 100% of away matches without scoring, whereas Miami concedes 1.33 at home and keeps a clean sheet in 33% of home games. In the last 5 matches Miami scored 5 goals with a record of 2 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss (1.6 points per game), while Brooklyn scored 7 in their last 5 but arrive with two consecutive away losses. Considering Miami’s superior chance-creation (more SOT and higher xG) and Brooklyn’s disastrous away efficiency (0 goals, 100% FTS and 3.00 average goals conceded), I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal for No Goal/Both Teams To Score - No is that the away team has not scored in any match this season (100% scoreless games) and has a season goals-per-game of 0.0, which drastically reduces BTTS likelihood. Miami FC II averages 1.2 goals scored and concedes 0.8 at home; their offensive xG is 1.6 with xG against 1.64, while the visitors have offensive xG of 1.12 and xG against 1.91, highlighting the visitors’ issues creating high-quality chances. In the last 5 matches the visitors improved and scored 7 goals (1.4 avg), but despite this both teams record BTTS in only 20% of their last five games each (20% and 20%), so mutual scoring is rare. Additionally, Miami records 5.8 shots on target and 12.6 shots per game versus 2.5 and 8.5 for the opponents, increasing the likelihood of a one-sided match with the visitors failing to score. Considering the visitors’ season-long 0% BTTS, 100% of their matches without a goal, and only 40% BTTS for the hosts, I estimate BTTS 'no' probability at 75% and 'yes' at 25%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG calculations project 1.76 expected goals for Miami (xG attack 1.60 vs xG defense Brooklyn 1.91) and 1.38 for Brooklyn (xG attack 1.12 vs xG defense Miami 1.64), total 3.14. A Poisson distribution with mean 3.14 yields ~82% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~61% for 3+ goals (Over 2.5) and ~38% for 4+ goals (Over 3.5). Match data reinforce this picture: Miami averages 12.6 shots and 5.8 on target per game and has 60% of matches with >1.5 goals, while Brooklyn averages 8.5 shots and 2.5 on target, but records 100% of matches above 1.5 and 2.5 and concedes 3.0 goals per game on average. Considering the clear positive home xG and the visitors’ tendency for high-scoring matches, the strongest and most reliable signal is Over 1.5; Over 2.5 has moderate value, and Over 3.5 is less certain given both teams’ 0% season rate for >3.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The home side lead at the break in 60% of their matches (leadingAtHT_home = 60%, 3 of 5) and score an average of 0.8 goals before half-time versus 0.0 for the visitors (scoredAVGHT_home 0.8 vs scoredAVGHT_away 0.0), which strongly supports Miami FC II leading after 45 minutes. Over full matches Miami FC II generates xG 1.6 versus 1.12 for Brooklyn FC and averages 12.6 shots with 5.8 on target compared to the opponents’ 8.5 shots and 2.5 on target, i.e. they create substantially more chances. Brooklyn FC have yet to win (winPercentage_away 0%, losePercentage_away 100%) and concede an average of 3.0 goals per match (seasonConcededAVG_away 3.0), which reduces their chances of a turnaround after the break. Therefore I assign the highest probability to the scenario of the home side leading at half-time and winning at full-time (1/1 = 42%); the next significant options are a half-time draw with a later home win (X/1 = 12%) and the home side leading at half-time and the match finishing a draw (1/X = 12%). Away-win scenarios remain unlikely (1/2 + X/2 + 2/2 = 11% combined), hence the recommendation to play 1/1 as the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Miami FC II | Brooklyn FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.18 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Miami FC II is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Miami FC II · 0.8 pts / match - Brooklyn FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Miami FC II is 16% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Miami FC II · 0.86 goals / match - Brooklyn FC
Miami FC II scores in 43% of matches (3 of 7 matches), while Brooklyn FC keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).
Brooklyn FC scores in 57% of matches (4 of 7 matches), while Miami FC II keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Miami FC II
Over / Under - Brooklyn FC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Brooklyn FC is 83% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.86 pts / match - Miami FC II · 1.57 pts / match - Brooklyn FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Miami FC II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Brooklyn FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 29%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Miami FC II
Brooklyn FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Miami FC II | Liga | Brooklyn FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.43 | 2.65 | ▼ 2.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 53% | ▼ 29% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 52% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 29% | • 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 65% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 57% | 80% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Miami FC II vs Brooklyn FC?
The USL Championship match finished Miami FC II 3:2 Brooklyn FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Miami FC II vs Brooklyn FC?
Miami FC II score 1.00 goals per game on average and Brooklyn FC 0.86. The USL Championship average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Miami FC II's matches and 29% of Brooklyn FC's.
What form are Miami FC II and Brooklyn FC in?
Over the last 5 games Miami FC II have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Brooklyn FC 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Miami FC II vs Brooklyn FC?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.