United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 21 September 2026

Miami FC II vs Las Vegas Lights: match statistics

Miami FC II crest
Miami FC II
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Las Vegas Lights crest
Las Vegas Lights

Miami FC II vs Las Vegas Lights: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Miami FC II played Las Vegas Lights in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 8 August 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Miami FC II: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Las Vegas Lights: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Miami FC II scores 1.25 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Las Vegas Lights scores 1.53 and concedes 1.73. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Miami FC II 50%, Las Vegas Lights 80%. Over 2.5: Miami FC II 50%, Las Vegas Lights 67%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Miami FC II has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.32. Miami FC II: 11.3 shots per match, Las Vegas Lights: 10.7.

Match halves

Miami FC II: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.69. Las Vegas Lights: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.87.

Goals by minute

Miami FC II: 76-90+ (5 goals). Las Vegas Lights: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Miami FC II have a clear home advantage: they win 40% of their home matches, while Las Vegas Lights lose as many as 56% of their away games. The hosts average 1.80 goals and create chances worth 1.45 xG at home, while Las Vegas’ away defence allows opponents 1.56 xG and concedes an average of 2.11 goals. The visitors are, however, in better current form, having recorded 3 wins, 1 draw and only 1 defeat in their last five matches, with a goal difference of 8:6. During the same period, Miami scored 11 goals and conceded 7, but their home defence keeps a clean sheet in just 20% of matches, so both teams should have opportunities to score. I give the hosts a slight edge due to their superior home attacking output and Las Vegas’ weak away defence.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is clear, as BTTS - Yes occurred in 63% of Miami FC II’s matches this season and in as many as 89% of Las Vegas Lights’ games, compared with the league average of 55%. Las Vegas have not kept a single clean sheet and concede an average of 2.11 goals per match, which strongly supports a goal from the home side. Miami FC II have scored an average of 2.2 goals in their last five matches, while their xG stood at 1.35, identical to the visitors’, meaning both teams are creating enough scoring opportunities. The visitors score an average of 1.67 goals per match and convert 18% of their shots, while Miami FC II conceded 1.4 goals per game in their last five matches. Miami FC II’s drop to a 40% BTTS rate in their last five appearances is a risk factor, but Las Vegas’ weak defence and their 80% BTTS rate over the same period leave the BTTS - Yes scenario as the more likely outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as at least two goals were scored in 75% of Miami FC II matches and in as many as 89% of Las Vegas Lights fixtures. Las Vegas averages 1.67 goals scored but concedes 2.11 per match and has kept a clean sheet in only 11% of its appearances, which clearly favors a goal for the home side. Miami FC II have been more effective recently, scoring 2.2 goals per match in their last five fixtures, while both teams recorded at least three goals in 60% of their matches during this period. A model based on current form and average xG, with both teams recording 1.35 in their last five matches, projects approximately 2.90 total goals; therefore, the 1.5 line offers the highest probability of success.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A half-time draw is the most likely outcome, as Miami FC II were level at the break in 6 of their 8 matches, or 75% of the time, while Las Vegas Lights were tied at this stage in 33% of their games. The hosts are more solid before half-time, averaging 0.88 goals scored and 0.63 conceded, whereas the visitors score just 0.56 goals and allow opponents 0.89. After the break, Miami’s advantage could increase, as Las Vegas concede an average of 1.22 goals in second halves, compared with just 0.38 conceded by the hosts. Miami’s chances of winning are also supported by their superior chance quality: their average xG stands at 1.34, while the Las Vegas defence allows opponents an xG of 1.56 and concedes an average of 2.11 goals per match. The visitors’ strong current form, with 3 wins in their last 5 matches, leaves a realistic chance of HT/FT outcomes involving a Las Vegas victory, but the strongest signal points to a draw at half-time and a home win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
-1Shots-1
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
-1Shots on target-1
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
0xG0
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
-1Corners-1
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
0Dangerous attacks0
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
-1Fouls-1
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
-1Cards-1
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
1.25Goals scored / match1.53
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
1.5Goals conceded / match1.73
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
48%Average possession51%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
4.06Shots on target / match3.6
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.25Shots per match10.73
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
4.06Shots on target3.6
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
11.1%Shot conversion14.3%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
48%Possession51%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
1.34xG for1.32
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
1.71xG against1.4
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights

Shooting quality

Miami FC II: BalancedLas Vegas Lights: Efficient finishing
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
Accuracy (shots on target)36%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Las Vegas Lights is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Miami FC II · 1.4 pts / match - Las Vegas Lights

Miami FC II
LDLDW
Season result split
31% W38% D31% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-5
1.31 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Las Vegas Lights
DWLLW
Season result split
33% W20% D47% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-7
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-5
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Las Vegas Lights is 22% better for: goals scored per match.

1.25 goals / match - Miami FC II · 1.53 goals / match - Las Vegas Lights

Miami FC II is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - Miami FC II · 1.73 goals / match - Las Vegas Lights

Miami FC II scoring profile: strong

Miami FC II scores in 56% of matches (9 of 16 matches), while Las Vegas Lights keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).

Las Vegas Lights scoring profile: very strong

Las Vegas Lights scores in 93% of matches (14 of 15 matches), while Miami FC II keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 matches).

20Goals scored (season)23
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
24Goals conceded (season)26
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
2.75Average goals in match3.27
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
5Goals scored (last 5)7
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
7Goals conceded (last 5)7
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal93%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
38%2 goals60%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
19%3 goals0%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
13%4 goals0%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal80%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
50%2 goals47%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
25%3 goals40%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
13%4 goals7%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

80%
Las Vegas Lights - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 15 matches
58%
League average

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time47%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
19%BTTS in both halves20%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
38%Scored in both halves33%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
40%BTTS - last 580%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time53%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
31%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Miami FC II is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.31 pts / match - Miami FC II · 1.13 pts / match - Las Vegas Lights

Miami FC II - half-time state
25% leading56% draw19% trailing
Las Vegas Lights - half-time state
20% leading53% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.31Points per match (1st half)1.13
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.67
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
1.13Average goals (1st half)1.47
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
63%Clean sheet before half-time33%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
50%No goal before half-time40%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.2
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)0.87
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
0.94Goals conceded (2nd half)0.93
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
1.63Average goals (2nd half)1.8
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
44%Clean sheet after half-time47%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights
56%No goal after half-time33%
Miami FC IILas Vegas Lights

Miami FC II - second-half results

19% W44% D38% L
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Las Vegas Lights - second-half results

27% W40% D33% L
17
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Miami FC II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Las Vegas Lights - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Miami FC II
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
3
31-45
4
5
46-60
2
4
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Las Vegas Lights
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
2
5
16-30
6
4
31-45
5
6
46-60
4
3
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-34%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Miami FC II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Las Vegas Lights

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Miami FC IILigaLas Vegas Lights
Average goals in match 2.752.79 3.27
Both teams scored 50%58% 80%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%52% 67%
Clean sheets 38%26% 20%
Goal before half-time 56%67% 80%
Goal after half-time 69%80% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Las Vegas LightsSubstitutionOn: Marc YbarraOff: Kyle Scott
  2. Miami FC IISubstitutionOn: Diego MelloOff: Mason Tunbridge
  3. Las Vegas LightsYellow cardManuel Alejandro Arteaga Rubianes
  4. Miami FC IISubstitutionOn: Rodrigo Da CostaOff: Joel Sou00f1ora
  5. Las Vegas LightsYellow cardGiorgio Probo
  6. Las Vegas LightsSubstitutionOn: Abraham OkyereOff: Christian Pinzon Barajas
  7. Las Vegas LightsSubstitutionOn: Blake PopeOff: Manuel Alejandro Arteaga Rubianes
  8. Miami FC IISubstitutionOn: Arthur RogersOff: Mouhamadou Bachir Ndiaye
  9. Miami FC IIYellow cardRiyon Tori
  10. Las Vegas LightsYellow cardBlake Pope

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Miami FC II 0 - 1 - 1 Las Vegas Lights. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Las Vegas Lights FC
0 : 0
Miami FC II
Las Vegas Lights
3 : 1
Miami FC II

FAQ

What was the result of Miami FC II vs Las Vegas Lights?

The USL Championship match finished Miami FC II 0:1 Las Vegas Lights. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Miami FC II and Las Vegas Lights?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Miami FC II won 0, Las Vegas Lights won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Miami FC II vs Las Vegas Lights?

Miami FC II score 1.25 goals per game on average and Las Vegas Lights 1.53. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Miami FC II's matches and 80% of Las Vegas Lights's.

What form are Miami FC II and Las Vegas Lights in?

Over the last 5 games Miami FC II have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Las Vegas Lights 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Miami FC II vs Las Vegas Lights?

The statistical background for Miami FC II vs Las Vegas Lights — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.