Miami FC II vs Orange County SC: match statistics
Miami FC II vs Orange County SC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Miami FC II played Orange County SC in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 24 June 2026. Final score: 2:4.
Current form
Miami FC II: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Orange County SC: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Miami FC II scores 1.15 and concedes 1.46 goals per match. Orange County SC scores 1.38 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.78 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Miami FC II 46%, Orange County SC 54%. Over 2.5: Miami FC II 54%, Orange County SC 31%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
Miami FC II has higher xG: 1.24 vs 1.22. Miami FC II: 10.3 shots per match, Orange County SC: 10.8.
Match halves
Miami FC II: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.69. Orange County SC: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.77.
Goals by minute
Miami FC II: 46-60 (4 goals). Orange County SC: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.78 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The visitors are the favorites: Orange County sit 3rd in the table versus Miami FC II in 14th, with a seasonal record of 6 wins, 5 draws and 2 losses compared to the hosts' 4-5-4. In the last five matches Orange scored 9 goals and average 1.4 points per game, while Miami scored 6 and average only 0.8 points per game; the hosts conceded as many as 11 goals in those five fixtures, the visitors 9. Defensively Orange looks more stable: Miami concedes 1.8 goals per home match while Orange concedes 1.29 on the road; additionally the clean sheet rate is 40% for Miami at home versus 0% for Orange away. Chance quality is similar (average shots around 11 for Miami vs 11.57 for Orange and shots on target 4 vs 3.71), xG is 1.32 for the hosts and 1.28 for the visitors, yet Orange actually scores 1.57 goals on the road with an xG of 1.28 and concedes 1.29 goals despite an xG against of 1.64, which suggests greater efficiency from the visitors and gives Orange the edge.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS statistics are divergent: seasonally Miami FC II has BTTS 33% with 50% clean sheets at home, whereas Orange County SC has a seasonal BTTS of 71% and only 29% matches with a clean sheet. In the last 5 matches Orange records BTTS in 100% of games, and Miami in 60%, which provides a strong form signal in favor of Goal/Goal. Orange is more productive offensively — season average 1.57 goals per match (1.8 in the last 5) and xG 1.28 (1.48 in the last 5) with 11.57 shots and 3.71 shots on target; Miami has 1.17 goals seasonally (1.2 in the last 5), 10.17 shots and 3.17 on target. Both teams have been conceding recently: Miami conceded 11 goals in 5 matches (2.2 avg), Orange 9 goals (1.8 avg), with last5 xG against 1.79 for Miami and 1.68 for Orange, which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. Considering Orange's 100% BTTS in the last 5, Miami's 60% and the league average BTTS of 55%, the Both Teams To Score - Yes bet looks stronger — I estimate BTTS probability at 70% versus 30% for No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The total expected goals from xG data is approximately 2.70: Miami has xG_for 1.17 and Orange County xG_against 1.64, yielding ~1.41 for the home side; Orange has xG_for 1.28 and Miami xG_against 1.29 -> ~1.29 for the away side. In the last 5 matches both teams produced a high number of goals: Miami scored 6 and conceded 11 (17 goals, 3.4 per match), Orange scored 9 and conceded 9 (18 goals, 3.6 per match), which increases the probability of Over 2.5 goals. Season-long signals are mixed (Miami over2.5 17%, Orange over2.5 43%), but recent form in the last 5 (60% and 80% over2.5) and the league average of 2.76 support a result above 2.5. Orange has 71% of matches with BTTS, while Miami has 50% clean sheets, so goals are likely from both sides; however the strongest signal from the data is Over 2.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a Half-Time draw and an away win by full-time (X/2), because the home side were level at the break in 50% of matches, while Orange County were level at half-time in as many as 71% of their games; in the last five matches the visitors were at a draw at the break in 100% of cases. The visitors dominate after the break: they average 1.71 goals in second halves versus 0.83 for the hosts and win second halves in 56% of cases compared with 33% for the home team, which increases the chance of a turnaround. Over the full match Orange County average 1.57 goals scored and 1.29 conceded (xG 1.28), while Miami II average 1.17 scored and 0.67 conceded (xG 1.17), meaning the visitors have higher offensive potential and greater expected goal opportunities. Additionally, the visitors register both-teams-to-score in 71% of their matches this season and have 86% of second halves featuring at least one goal, which favors the scenario that after a frequently draw first period the match will be decided in Orange County’s favour. For these reasons the safest pick is X/2.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Miami FC II | Orange County SC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Orange County SC is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Miami FC II · 1.6 pts / match - Orange County SC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Orange County SC is 20% better for: goals scored per match.
1.15 goals / match - Miami FC II · 1.38 goals / match - Orange County SC
Orange County SC is 46% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.46 goals / match - Miami FC II · 1 goals / match - Orange County SC
Miami FC II scores in 46% of matches (6 of 13 matches), while Orange County SC keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 matches).
Orange County SC scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while Miami FC II keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Miami FC II
Over / Under - Orange County SC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Orange County SC is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.08 pts / match - Miami FC II · 1.31 pts / match - Orange County SC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Miami FC II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Orange County SC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 0% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Miami FC II
Orange County SC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Miami FC II | Liga | Orange County SC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.62 | 2.78 | ▼ 2.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 46% | 55% | • 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 54% | 51% | ▼ 31% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 27% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 46% | 66% | ▲ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 62% | 79% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Miami FC II 0 - 1 - 0 Orange County SC. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Miami FC II vs Orange County SC?
The USL Championship match finished Miami FC II 2:4 Orange County SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Miami FC II vs Orange County SC?
Miami FC II score 1.15 goals per game on average and Orange County SC 1.38. The USL Championship average is 2.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Miami FC II's matches and 54% of Orange County SC's.
What form are Miami FC II and Orange County SC in?
Over the last 5 games Miami FC II have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Orange County SC 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Miami FC II vs Orange County SC?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


