United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 23 July 2026

Miami FC II vs Phoenix Rising: match statistics

Miami FC II crest
Miami FC II
0 : 3half-time 0:1
Phoenix Rising crest
Phoenix Rising

Miami FC II vs Phoenix Rising: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Miami FC II play Phoenix Rising in USL Championship (United States). The match date is 19 April 2026 at 01:00. Final score: 0:3.

Current form

Miami FC II: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Phoenix Rising: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Miami FC II scores 1.25 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Phoenix Rising scores 1.44 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Miami FC II 50%, Phoenix Rising 56%. Over 2.5: Miami FC II 50%, Phoenix Rising 50%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Phoenix Rising has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.34. Miami FC II: 11.3 shots per match, Phoenix Rising: 12.4.

Match halves

Miami FC II: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.69. Phoenix Rising: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Miami FC II: 76-90+ (5 goals). Phoenix Rising: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Miami FC II have a strong home run: at home they record 50% wins, 50% draws and 0% losses, score on average 1.0 goals and concede 0.5 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in 50% of games. Phoenix Rising have yet to win away (0% wins) and lose 67% of their away matches, scoring just 0.67 goals and conceding 1.67 goals per away game. Miami are also more efficient with shots: 11% conversion versus Phoenix’s 6% and 4.5 shots on target per game versus 3.33 for the visitors, which — despite a similar xG (1.17 for Miami vs 1.30 for Phoenix) — gives them an edge in turning chances into goals. Over the last 5 matches the hosts average 1.8 points per game and have conceded 3 goals, while Phoenix average 1.4 points per game and have conceded 6 goals, confirming Miami’s superior form and defensive resilience. Considering the visitors’ lack of away wins, the defensive advantage (0.5 vs 1.67 conceded) and higher conversion efficiency, I back the home win.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
16Shots9
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
3Shots on target4
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
1.7xG1.19
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
5Corners4
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
67Dangerous attacks46
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
19Fouls21
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
2Cards4
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
1.25Goals scored / match1.44
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
1.5Goals conceded / match1.5
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
48%Average possession50%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
4.06Shots on target / match4.75
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.25Shots per match12.38
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
4.06Shots on target4.75
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
11.1%Shot conversion11.6%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
48%Possession50%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
1.34xG for1.49
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
1.71xG against1.31
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising

Shooting quality

Miami FC II: BalancedPhoenix Rising: Balanced
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
Accuracy (shots on target)36%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Miami FC II is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Miami FC II · 0.8 pts / match - Phoenix Rising

Miami FC II
LDLDW
Season result split
31% W38% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-5
1.31 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Phoenix Rising
LDLLW
Season result split
31% W31% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-6
1.25 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WWLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Phoenix Rising is 15% better for: goals scored per match.

1.25 goals / match - Miami FC II · 1.44 goals / match - Phoenix Rising

Miami FC II scoring profile: strong

Miami FC II scores in 56% of matches (9 of 16 matches), while Phoenix Rising keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).

Phoenix Rising scoring profile: strong

Phoenix Rising scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Miami FC II keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 matches).

20Goals scored (season)23
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
24Goals conceded (season)24
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
2.75Average goals in match2.94
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
5Goals scored (last 5)8
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
7Goals conceded (last 5)12
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal81%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
38%2 goals38%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
19%3 goals25%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
13%4 goals0%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal75%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
50%2 goals50%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
25%3 goals19%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
13%4 goals6%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time13%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
19%BTTS in both halves6%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
38%Scored in both halves19%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS31%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
40%BTTS - last 580%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
31%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Miami FC II is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.31 pts / match - Miami FC II · 1.19 pts / match - Phoenix Rising

Miami FC II - half-time state
25% leading56% draw19% trailing
Phoenix Rising - half-time state
25% leading44% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.31Points per match (1st half)1.19
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.44
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
1.13Average goals (1st half)1.13
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
63%Clean sheet before half-time56%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
50%No goal before half-time63%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)1
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
0.94Goals conceded (2nd half)0.81
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
1.63Average goals (2nd half)1.81
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
44%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising
56%No goal after half-time38%
Miami FC IIPhoenix Rising

Miami FC II - second-half results

19% W44% R38% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Phoenix Rising - second-half results

38% W38% R25% P
19
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Miami FC II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Phoenix Rising - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.42.0
Average goals in match0.83.2
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Miami FC II
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
3
31-45
4
5
46-60
2
4
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Phoenix Rising
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
1
2
16-30
3
6
31-45
2
8
46-60
6
2
61-75
8
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.84
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-30%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Miami FC II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Phoenix Rising

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.45
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Miami FC IILigaPhoenix Rising
Average goals in match 2.752.79 2.94
Both teams scored 50%58% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%52% 50%
Clean sheets 38%26% 25%
Goal before half-time 56%67% 69%
Goal after half-time 69%80% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Miami FC II 0 - 0 - 1 Phoenix Rising. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Phoenix Rising
2 : 0
Miami FC II

FAQ

What was the result of Miami FC II vs Phoenix Rising?

The USL Championship match finished Miami FC II 0:3 Phoenix Rising. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Miami FC II vs Phoenix Rising?

Miami FC II score 1.25 goals per game on average and Phoenix Rising 1.44. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Miami FC II's matches and 56% of Phoenix Rising's.

What form are Miami FC II and Phoenix Rising in?

Over the last 5 games Miami FC II have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Phoenix Rising 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Miami FC II vs Phoenix Rising?

The statistical background for Miami FC II vs Phoenix Rising — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.