United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 04 September 2026

Miami FC II vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Miami FC II vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Miami FC II play Pittsburgh Riverhounds in USL Championship (United States). The match date is 5 September 2026.

Current form

Miami FC II: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Miami FC II scores 1.25 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores 1.27 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Miami FC II 50%, Pittsburgh Riverhounds 47%. Over 2.5: Miami FC II 50%, Pittsburgh Riverhounds 47%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Miami FC II has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.24. Miami FC II: 11.3 shots per match, Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 9.7.

Match halves

Miami FC II: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.69. Pittsburgh Riverhounds: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.87.

Goals by minute

Miami FC II: 76-90+ (5 goals). Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 46-60 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-3. Average goals 2.60, BTTS 40%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(2.95)
(3.15)
(2.30)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
1.25Goals scored / match1.27
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
1.5Goals conceded / match1.2
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
48%Average possession49%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
4.06Shots on target / match3.47
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.25Shots per match9.67
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
4.06Shots on target3.47
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
11.1%Shot conversion13.1%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
48%Possession49%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
1.34xG for1.24
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
1.71xG against1.29
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds

Shooting quality

Miami FC II: BalancedPittsburgh Riverhounds: Efficient finishing
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
Accuracy (shots on target)36%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Miami FC II · 1.4 pts / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds

Miami FC II
LDLDW
Season result split
31% W38% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-5
1.31 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
WDLLW
Season result split
47% W13% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-2-6
1.53 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - Miami FC II · 1.2 goals / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds

Miami FC II scoring profile: strong

Miami FC II scores in 56% of matches (9 of 16 matches), while Pittsburgh Riverhounds keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

Pittsburgh Riverhounds scoring profile: strong

Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Miami FC II keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 matches).

20Goals scored (season)19
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
24Goals conceded (season)18
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
2.75Average goals in match2.47
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
5Goals scored (last 5)5
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal67%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
38%2 goals40%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
19%3 goals20%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
13%4 goals0%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal73%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
50%2 goals40%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
25%3 goals7%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
13%4 goals0%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
Pittsburgh Riverhounds - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.7 of 15 matches
58%
League average

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time7%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
19%BTTS in both halves7%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
38%Scored in both halves27%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
40%BTTS - last 540%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
31%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Miami FC II - half-time state
25% leading56% draw19% trailing
Pittsburgh Riverhounds - half-time state
27% leading47% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.31Points per match (1st half)1.27
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
1.13Average goals (1st half)0.73
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
63%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
50%No goal before half-time67%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.47
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)0.87
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
0.94Goals conceded (2nd half)0.87
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
1.63Average goals (2nd half)1.73
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
44%Clean sheet after half-time40%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds
56%No goal after half-time40%
Miami FC IIPittsburgh Riverhounds

Miami FC II - second-half results

19% W44% R38% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds - second-half results

40% W27% R33% P
19
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Miami FC II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Pittsburgh Riverhounds - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.21.8
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Miami FC II
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
3
31-45
4
5
46-60
2
4
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
3
3
16-30
0
2
31-45
7
4
46-60
3
4
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.61
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
0%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
38%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Miami FC II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Pittsburgh Riverhounds

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Miami FC IILigaPittsburgh Riverhounds
Average goals in match 2.752.79 2.47
Both teams scored 50%58% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%52% 47%
Clean sheets 38%26% 27%
Goal before half-time 56%67% 60%
Goal after half-time 69%80% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Miami FC II 1 - 1 - 3 Pittsburgh Riverhounds. Average goals 2.60, both teams scored in 40% matches.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds FC
2 : 0
Miami FC II
Miami FC II
3 : 1
Pittsburgh Riverhounds FC
Pittsburgh Riverhounds FC
1 : 1
Miami FC II
Miami FC II
0 : 4
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
1 : 0
Miami FC II

FAQ

When do Miami FC II and Pittsburgh Riverhounds play?

Miami FC II face Pittsburgh Riverhounds on 5 September 2026 in USL Championship. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Miami FC II and Pittsburgh Riverhounds?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Miami FC II won 1, Pittsburgh Riverhounds won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Miami FC II vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds?

Miami FC II score 1.25 goals per game on average and Pittsburgh Riverhounds 1.27. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Miami FC II's matches and 47% of Pittsburgh Riverhounds's.

What form are Miami FC II and Pittsburgh Riverhounds in?

Over the last 5 games Miami FC II have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Pittsburgh Riverhounds 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Miami FC II vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Miami FC II vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.