Match suspended or postponed
The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.
Miami FC II vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds: match statistics
Miami FC II vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Miami FC II play Pittsburgh Riverhounds in USL Championship (United States). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.
Current form
Miami FC II: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Miami FC II scores 1.14 and concedes 1.77 goals per match. Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores 1.09 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.71 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Miami FC II 50%, Pittsburgh Riverhounds 39%. Over 2.5: Miami FC II 55%, Pittsburgh Riverhounds 39%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Miami FC II has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.17. Miami FC II: 10.9 shots per match, Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 8.9.
Match halves
Miami FC II: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.64. Pittsburgh Riverhounds: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.70.
Goals by minute
Miami FC II: 31-45+ (6 goals). Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-3. Average goals 2.60, BTTS 40%.
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Miami FC II | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 700% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Miami FC II · 1.6 pts / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Miami FC II is 5% better for: goals scored per match.
1.14 goals / match - Miami FC II · 1.09 goals / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 77% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.77 goals / match - Miami FC II · 1 goals / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Miami FC II scores in 55% of matches (12 of 22 matches), while Pittsburgh Riverhounds keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 matches).
Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores in 61% of matches (14 of 23 matches), while Miami FC II keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Miami FC II
Over / Under - Pittsburgh Riverhounds
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.05 pts / match - Miami FC II · 1.3 pts / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Miami FC II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Pittsburgh Riverhounds - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Miami FC II
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Miami FC II | Liga | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.91 | 2.71 | ▼ 2.09 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 54% | ▼ 39% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 55% | 49% | ▼ 39% |
| Clean sheets | • 27% | 28% | ▲ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | • 64% | 65% | ▼ 52% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 79% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Miami FC II 1 - 1 - 3 Pittsburgh Riverhounds. Average goals 2.60, both teams scored in 40% matches.