Midland vs Club Atlético Güemes: match statistics
Midland vs Club Atlético Güemes: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Midland played Club Atlético Güemes in Prim B Nacional (Argentina). The match was played on 3 May 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Midland: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Club Atlético Güemes: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Midland scores 0.80 and concedes 0.70 goals per match. Club Atlético Güemes scores 1.00 and concedes 1.40. League average: 1.83 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Midland 30%, Club Atlético Güemes 70%. Over 2.5: Midland 20%, Club Atlético Güemes 40%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.
xG, shots and style
Midland has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.09. Midland: 15.2 shots per match, Club Atlético Güemes: 8.7.
Match halves
Midland: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.40. Club Atlético Güemes: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Midland: 76-90+ (3 goals). Club Atlético Güemes: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Prim B Nacional: 1.83 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a Midland win — they have a clear advantage in chance creation at home: an average of 17.4 shots (4.8 on target) with 60% possession and xG 2.00 per game, versus 9.25 shots (4.0 on target) and xG 1.11 for Club Atlético Güemes away. Defensively the hosts perform better: they concede only 0.4 goals per home game and keep clean sheets in 60% of matches, while the visitors concede 1.25 goals away and have 0% clean sheets. Güemes compensates with efficiency — a conversion rate of 14% versus Midland’s 5% translates into an average of 1.25 goals scored away, while Midland scores 0.8 at home, so the visitors can be dangerous with fewer chances. In the last 5 matches Midland averages 1.4 points per game and Güemes 1.0; over that period the hosts have scored 5 and conceded 5, and the visitors have scored 5 and conceded 8, indicating greater defensive instability for the away side. Considering the xG advantage (2.00 vs 1.11), superior game control and better defensive metrics, I give Midland a 60% chance to win, a 25% chance of a draw and a 15% chance for the visitors to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I assess that a BTTS - Yes scenario is more likely; Club Atlético Güemes has a seasonal BTTS rate of 100% while Midland is at 50%, which strongly supports Yes. Both teams regularly concede: Midland averages 1.5 goals conceded per match this season, Güemes 1.25, and in the last 5 fixtures the hosts conceded 1.0 and the visitors 1.6 goals per game. Seasonal xG figures are similar (1.07 vs 1.11), but the visitors register more shots on target (4.0 vs 2.17) and have higher conversion (14% vs 10%), increasing the likelihood that both sides will create scoring opportunities. A league-level counter-signal is the low BTTS rate of 36% and a high clean sheet expected rate of 83%, however the teams' individual numbers — Güemes 10 scored and 14 conceded, Midland 8 scored and 7 conceded — still favor a goal-involved match. Taking this into account I assign 70% to Yes and 30% to No as the assessment most consistent with the available data.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project approximately 1.19 goals for Midland and 1.13 for Club Atlético Güemes, totaling 2.32 xG for the match. Both teams show a strong signal for Over 1.5 goals: Midland recorded Over 1.5 in 83% of home matches, and Güemes in 100% of away games, with the league average only 1.78 goals per game. Güemes generates more high-quality chances (avg. 4.0 shots on target vs 2.17 for Midland) and has a higher conversion rate 14% vs 10%, while hosts concede on average 1.5 goals and visitors 1.25, increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides (BTTS: Midland 50%, Güemes 100%). I rate Over 2.5 as less certain — Midland has Over 2.5 in 33% of matches, Güemes in 50%, and in the last five matches of both teams Over 2.5 occurred in 40% of cases, hence roughly a 46% probability for Over 2.5. Given the combined xG of 2.32, high BTTS share and dominant Over 1.5 indicators (83% vs 100%), the strongest signal is a play on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
xG analysis indicates parity: Midland have xG_for 1.07 and xG_against vs this opponent 1.31 (approximately 1.19 average for Midland), while Club Atlético Güemes have xG_for 1.11 and xG_against vs Midland 1.15 (approximately 1.13 average for the visitors), suggesting a score close to 1:1. At Half-Time both teams average 0.5 goals each (scoredAVGHT_home 0.5 vs scoredAVGHT_away 0.5), and Midland keep a clean sheet at the break in 67% of matches (seasonCSPercentageHT_home 67%), so 0:0/a draw at Half-Time is likely. Over Full-Time the hosts win at home only 17% of matches (winPercentage_home 17%), while the visitors draw 50% of matches (drawPercentage_away 50%) and register more on-target shots on average (4.0 vs 2.17), favoring drawn outcomes. Additionally, in Midland’s last 5 matches they were level at Half-Time in 60% of cases (last5_drawingAtHT_overall_home 60%) and averaged 1.8 points at HT versus 1.4 for the visitors (1.8 vs 1.4), therefore the strongest signal from the data is X/X (draw at Half-Time and draw at Full-Time).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Midland | Club Atlético Güemes | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.18 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Club Atlético Güemes is 25% better for: goals scored per match.
0.8 goals / match - Midland · 1 goals / match - Club Atlético Güemes
Midland is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.7 goals / match - Midland · 1.4 goals / match - Club Atlético Güemes
Midland scores in 60% of matches (6 of 10 matches), while Club Atlético Güemes keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 10 matches).
Club Atlético Güemes scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while Midland keeps a clean sheet in 50% (5 of 10 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Midland
Over / Under - Club Atlético Güemes
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Midland is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.7 pts / match - Midland · 1.5 pts / match - Club Atlético Güemes
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Midland - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 30%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Club Atlético Güemes - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Midland
Club Atlético Güemes
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Prim B Nacional).
Teams vs league
| Midland | Liga | Club Atlético Güemes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.50 | 1.83 | ▲ 2.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 30% | 38% | ▲ 70% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 20% | 28% | ▲ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 40% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 59% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | • 70% | 70% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Midland vs Club Atlético Güemes?
The Prim B Nacional match finished Midland 2:1 Club Atlético Güemes. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Midland vs Club Atlético Güemes?
Midland score 0.80 goals per game on average and Club Atlético Güemes 1.00. The Prim B Nacional average is 1.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Midland's matches and 70% of Club Atlético Güemes's.
What form are Midland and Club Atlético Güemes in?
Over the last 5 games Midland have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Club Atlético Güemes 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Midland vs Club Atlético Güemes?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


