Miedź Legnica II vs Falubaz Zielona Góra: match statistics
Miedź Legnica II vs Falubaz Zielona Góra: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Miedź Legnica II played Falubaz Zielona Góra in 3 Liga Group 3 (Poland). The match was played on 18 April 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Miedź Legnica II: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Falubaz Zielona Góra: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Miedź Legnica II scores 1.77 and concedes 1.92 goals per match. Falubaz Zielona Góra scores 2.31 and concedes 0.58. League average: 3.23 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Miedź Legnica II 69%, Falubaz Zielona Góra 46%. Over 2.5: Miedź Legnica II 81%, Falubaz Zielona Góra 62%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.
xG, shots and style
Falubaz Zielona Góra has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.50. Miedź Legnica II: 9.7 shots per match, Falubaz Zielona Góra: 8.7.
Match halves
Miedź Legnica II: half-time lead 4%, second-half goals 0.50. Falubaz Zielona Góra: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.58.
Goals by minute
Miedź Legnica II: 0-15 (31 goals). Falubaz Zielona Góra: 0-15 (35 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
3 Liga Group 3: 3.23 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Falubaz Zielona Góra is the favorite based on season metrics: 14 wins, 9 draws and only 3 losses compared to Miedź’s 8-6-12. The visitors concede an average of 0.77 goals away, while the hosts concede 1.92 goals at home; additionally Falubaz has 38% clean sheets away versus 8% for Miedź in home matches. Both teams score an average of 2.46 goals (Miedź at home and Falubaz away), but Miedź has a higher home xG (1.64 vs 1.55 xG for Falubaz away) and better shot conversion (18% conversion vs 15%), giving them genuine offensive opportunities. In the last 5 matches Miedź earned 2 points per game and won 3 of 5, whereas Falubaz has only 1 point per game in that period, indicating some instability from the visitors. Summary: I predict an away victory due to markedly better defense and superior season record, although the match could be tight if Miedź exploits their offensive efficiency.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes: seasonal indicators show a large divergence — Miedź II has BTTS at 31%, while Falubaz 62% and the league average is 61%. A strong signal for Yes comes from Miedź’s last 5 matches, where BTTS was 80%; the team scores 2.2 on average and concedes 1.4 per game, while Falubaz in that period scores 1.4 and concedes 0.8, suggesting both sides can score and concede. xG and shots metrics confirm the offensive profile: last 5 matches show xG 1.7 for Miedź vs 1.3 for Falubaz, xG against 1.57 vs 1.24, and average shots 14.44 vs 13.0 with shots on target 5.89 vs 5.75, providing realistic chances for both teams to find the net. The counterargument is Miedź’s high season clean sheet rate (69%) and very low season average goals conceded 0.38, which historically reduces BTTS likelihood for the home side. Nevertheless, I give greater weight to current form and the league tendency (league 61% BTTS, Falubaz 62%), so I assess BTTS probability at 70% vs 30% and recommend choosing "Yes" (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on home xG 1.85 and away xG 1.55, and xG against 1.10 (home) and 1.19 (away), expected goals are about 1.52 for Miedź II and 1.33 for Falubaz, totaling ≈2.85 goals. This aligns with seasonal figures: Miedź II scores on average 2.15 goals, Falubaz 2.46, and in the last 5 matches Miedź has scored 11 goals (2.2 avg) and conceded 7 (1.4), while Falubaz has 7 scored (1.4) and 4 conceded (0.8). Season-to-date both teams have 77% of matches over 1.5 goals, and a Poisson model with total xG = 2.85 gives probability of at least 2 goals ≈77.7%, hence over 1.5 ≈78%. For higher lines the model returns probability of at least 3 goals ≈54% (Over 2.5 ≈55%) and at least 4 goals ≈32% (Over 3.5 ≈32%), which is consistent with seasonal over 2.5 values: 54% (home) / 69% (away) and over 3.5: 23% / 38%. The strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 due to total xG 2.85, seasonal 77% over 1.5 and modelled ≈78% probability.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A half-time draw is likely — the home side had a draw at the break in 50% of their last 5 matches, and the away side in 60%, with season-long HT draws at 38%. After the break the home team is clearly stronger: in the last 5 matches they averaged 1.5 goals in the second half and 2.5 points in second halves, while the visitors averaged 0.6 goals and 1.2 points. Additionally, the hosts led at the break in 50% of all season matches but only in 25% of the last 5, which together suggests a Half-Time draw followed by a home turnaround after the break. Therefore I assign the highest probability to the Half-Time draw / home win scenario (X/1 = 27%), slightly above the traditional home-leading-from-start scenario (1/1 = 26%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Miedź Legnica II | Falubaz Zielona Góra | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.20 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.45 | 0.67 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Miedź Legnica II is 100% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Miedź Legnica II · 1 pts / match - Falubaz Zielona Góra
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Falubaz Zielona Góra is 31% better for: goals scored per match.
1.77 goals / match - Miedź Legnica II · 2.31 goals / match - Falubaz Zielona Góra
Falubaz Zielona Góra is 231% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.92 goals / match - Miedź Legnica II · 0.58 goals / match - Falubaz Zielona Góra
Miedź Legnica II scores in 77% of matches (20 of 26 matches), while Falubaz Zielona Góra keeps a clean sheet in 54% (14 of 26 matches).
Falubaz Zielona Góra scores in 81% of matches (21 of 26 matches), while Miedź Legnica II keeps a clean sheet in 12% (3 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Miedź Legnica II
Over / Under - Falubaz Zielona Góra
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Falubaz Zielona Góra is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.96 pts / match - Miedź Legnica II · 1.42 pts / match - Falubaz Zielona Góra
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Miedź Legnica II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 4% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Falubaz Zielona Góra - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (31 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (38). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (35 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Miedź Legnica II
Falubaz Zielona Góra
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 3).
Teams vs league
| Miedź Legnica II | Liga | Falubaz Zielona Góra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.69 | 3.23 | ▼ 2.88 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 69% | 61% | ▼ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 81% | 66% | ▼ 62% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 12% | 22% | ▲ 54% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 19% | 35% | ▲ 42% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 31% | 36% | ▲ 38% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Miedź Legnica II 0 - 1 - 0 Falubaz Zielona Góra. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Miedź Legnica II vs Falubaz Zielona Góra?
The 3 Liga Group 3 match finished Miedź Legnica II 0:2 Falubaz Zielona Góra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Miedź Legnica II vs Falubaz Zielona Góra?
Miedź Legnica II score 1.77 goals per game on average and Falubaz Zielona Góra 2.31. The 3 Liga Group 3 average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Miedź Legnica II's matches and 46% of Falubaz Zielona Góra's.
What form are Miedź Legnica II and Falubaz Zielona Góra in?
Over the last 5 games Miedź Legnica II have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Falubaz Zielona Góra 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Miedź Legnica II vs Falubaz Zielona Góra?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Miedź Legnica II vs Falubaz Zielona Góra: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


