Poland - 1. LigaStadion im. Orła BiałegoData current as of 23 September 2026

Miedź Legnica vs Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki: match statistics

Miedź Legnica vs Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Miedź Legnica played Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki in 1. Liga (Poland). The match was played on 8 August 2026. Venue: Stadion im. Orła Białego. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Miedź Legnica: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match. Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki: 2-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Miedź Legnica scores 1.50 and concedes 0.50 goals per match. Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki scores 2.00 and concedes 0.00. League average: 3.00 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Miedź Legnica 50%, Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki 0%. Over 2.5: Miedź Legnica 0%, Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki 50%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Miedź Legnica has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.48. Miedź Legnica: 17.0 shots per match, Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki: 13.0.

Match halves

Miedź Legnica: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.50. Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Miedź Legnica: 76-90+ (2 goals). Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.00 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Pogoń Grodzisk Mazowiecki arrive as the second-placed team, with a perfect record of 2 wins and a 4:0 goal difference, while Miedź have 1 win and 1 draw. Away from home, the visitors won their only match so far, scoring an average of 3 goals and conceding none, while their average xG against stands at just 1.05. Pogoń create fewer attempts than Miedź (16 to 23), but register twice as many shots on target, 8 to 4, with a finishing efficiency of 19% compared to the hosts’ 4%. Miedź dominate possession at 61% and generate a high xG of 2.26, but drew their only home match and scored just one goal. The visitors’ edge in defensive performance, finishing quality and away results to date makes them slight favourites to win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, as in the current season data, both teams have kept a clean sheet in 100% of their matches, while each has a BTTS rate of 0%. In their last 5 matches, Pogoń allowed opponents an average of 0.6 goals and recorded BTTS in only 20% of those fixtures, increasing the likelihood that Miedź will fail to score. The hosts do, however, have arguments in favor of a goal: their average xG across the last five matches is 1.82, and BTTS occurred in 60% of games during this period. Although Pogoń has created more over the season, with an average xG of 1.93 compared with Miedź’s 1.02, their solid defense and clean sheets to date slightly favor a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The latest results point to a fairly controlled profile for both teams: Miedź have scored 7 and conceded 4 goals in their last five matches, while Pogoń have recorded 5 and 3 respectively, producing averages of just 2.2 and 1.6 goals per game. During this period, both teams had at least three goals in only 40% of their matches, while their defenses conceded an average of 0.8 goals per match for Miedź and 0.6 for Pogoń. However, their creative potential is not low, as the average xG from the last five matches stands at 1.82 for the hosts and 1.39 for the visitors. Therefore, the projected total of 2.55 goals does not justify a strong position on Under 2.5. The Under 3.5 line offers a clearer edge: even with moderately efficient attacking performances, reaching four goals would require a result significantly above both teams’ recent norm.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to a level first half, after which Miedź will take the initiative: in their last 5 matches, the hosts were drawing at half-time in 60% of games, compared with 40% for Pogoń. Miedź scored just 0.2 goals per match before the break and conceded 0.8, making a half-time lead less likely than a draw or a Pogoń advantage. After the interval, the pattern clearly reverses: the hosts averaged 1.2 goals without conceding any, and won the second half in all of their last 5 matches. Pogoń averaged 0.6 goals after the break, while 60% of those second halves ended level, limiting their chances of holding on to any potential lead. In addition, Miedź have the better current match-winning rate, winning 60% of their last 5 matches compared with Pogoń’s 40%. Therefore, the most logical scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a home win at full-time: X/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
20Shots16
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
3Shots on target9
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
2.24xG2.16
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
7Corners5
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
107Dangerous attacks74
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
9Fouls2
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
2Cards1
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
1.5Goals scored / match2
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
0.5Goals conceded / match0
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
62%Average possession50%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
3Shots on target / match4.5
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

17Shots per match13
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
3Shots on target4.5
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
8.8%Shot conversion15.4%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
62%Possession50%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
1.76xG for1.48
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
1.72xG against1.17
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki

Shooting quality

Miedź Legnica: DominantPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki: Efficient finishing
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
Accuracy (shots on target)18%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.500.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki is 50% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Miedź Legnica · 3 pts / match - Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki

Miedź Legnica
DW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 at home
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 0%
Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
WW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 50%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Miedź Legnica · 2 goals / match - Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki

Miedź Legnica scoring profile: mixed

Miedź Legnica scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki keeps a clean sheet in 100% (2 of 2 matches).

Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki scoring profile: very strong

Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Miedź Legnica keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

3Goals scored (season)4
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
1Goals conceded (season)0
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
2Average goals in match2
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
3Goals scored (last 5)4
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
1Goals conceded (last 5)0
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
50%2 goals50%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
0%3 goals50%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
0%4 goals0%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal0%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
0%2 goals0%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
0%3 goals0%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
0%4 goals0%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

0%
Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.0 of 2 matches
55%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
0%Scored in both halves50%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS50%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
50%BTTS - last 50%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki is 500% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / match - Miedź Legnica · 3 pts / match - Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki

Miedź Legnica - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing
Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per match (1st half)3
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
0Goals scored (1st half)1
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
0.5Average goals (1st half)1
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
50%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
100%No goal before half-time0%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki

After half-time (2nd half)

3Points per match (2nd half)2
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
1.5Goals scored (2nd half)1
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
0Goals conceded (2nd half)0
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
100%Clean sheet after half-time100%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
0%No goal after half-time50%
Miedź LegnicaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki

Miedź Legnica - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki - second-half results

50% W50% D0% L
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Miedź Legnica - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.503.00
Goals scored / match0.01.5
Goals conceded / match0.50.0
Average goals in match0.51.5
1 goal50%100%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%100%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.002.00
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal100%50%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal0%50%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Miedź Legnica
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
67%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+50%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Miedź Legnica

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.96
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+1.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
30%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.5
Late goals
67% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
67%

Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.69
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+1.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
0%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Miedź LegnicaLigaPogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
Average goals in match 2.003.00 2.00
Both teams scored 50%55% 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 0%55% 50%
Clean sheets 50%23% 100%
Goal before half-time 50%80% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%75% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.00
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / match
1.65
Away goals / match
+-18%
Home attack advantage
+-22%
Home defence advantage
+-15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
30%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Pogoń Grod. MazowieckiGoalRadoslaw MajewskiAssist: Jakub Jędrasik
  2. Miedź LegnicaSubstitutionOn: Zvonimir PetrovićOff: Wojciech Hajda
  3. Miedź LegnicaSubstitutionOn: Igor MaliszewskiOff: Oliwier Szymoniak
  4. Pogoń Grod. MazowieckiYellow cardNikodem Niski
  5. Miedź LegnicaRed cardKristian Fućak

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Miedź Legnica 0 - 1 - 1 Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

MKS Miedź Legnica
1 : 1
GKS Pogoń Grodzisk Mazowiecki
GKS Pogoń Grodzisk Mazowiecki
4 : 0
MKS Miedź Legnica

FAQ

What was the result of Miedź Legnica vs Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki?

The 1. Liga match finished Miedź Legnica 0:1 Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Miedź Legnica and Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Miedź Legnica won 0, Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Miedź Legnica vs Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki?

Miedź Legnica score 1.50 goals per game on average and Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki 2.00. The 1. Liga average is 3.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Miedź Legnica's matches and 0% of Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki's.

What form are Miedź Legnica and Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki in?

Over the last 5 games Miedź Legnica have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki 2-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Miedź Legnica vs Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki?

The statistical background for Miedź Legnica vs Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.