United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 24 September 2026

Minnesota United II vs San Jose Earthquakes II: match statistics

Minnesota United II vs San Jose Earthquakes II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Minnesota United II played San Jose Earthquakes II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 9 August 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Minnesota United II: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. San Jose Earthquakes II: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Minnesota United II scores 1.38 and concedes 1.62 goals per match. San Jose Earthquakes II scores 2.00 and concedes 1.26. League average: 3.25 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Minnesota United II 52%, San Jose Earthquakes II 63%. Over 2.5: Minnesota United II 57%, San Jose Earthquakes II 63%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

San Jose Earthquakes II has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.58. Minnesota United II: 13.5 shots per match, San Jose Earthquakes II: 13.8.

Match halves

Minnesota United II: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.71. San Jose Earthquakes II: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.89.

Goals by minute

Minnesota United II: 61-75 (7 goals). San Jose Earthquakes II: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.25 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-2. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Minnesota United II have the home advantage: they average 1.7 goals per match at home, while their chances created are valued at 1.83 xG, higher than San Jose Earthquakes II’s 1.64 xG away from home. The hosts also register more shots on target at home, averaging 5.8 compared with the visitors’ 4.6, with almost identical finishing efficiency (11% versus 12%). However, both teams are in poor recent form, having each recorded 1 win, 1 draw and 3 defeats in their last five matches. During that period, Minnesota conceded 11 goals, while San Jose conceded 7. The visitors’ away defence offers little stability, as they concede an average of 1.7 goals and have kept a clean sheet in only 10% of such matches. Given Minnesota’s greater attacking potential at home, the hosts’ advantage appears slight but sufficient to indicate result 1.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - Yes tip is primarily supported by San Jose Earthquakes II’s defensive profile away from home: the team concedes an average of 1.70 goals, keeps a clean sheet in only 10% of matches, and their opponents create an average of 1.71 xG against them. At home, Minnesota United II scores an average of 2.33 goals with 5.78 shots on target per match, giving them a strong foundation to exploit this weakness. The visitors should, in turn, benefit from a clear decline in Minnesota’s defensive performance, with the hosts conceding 11 goals in their last 5 matches, or 2.2 per game, while opponents have recorded an average xG of 2.02. During this period, San Jose produced 1.88 xG per match and scored an average of 1.4 goals, which supports the expectation that they will find the net despite the hosts’ stronger season-long home defence, conceding 0.78 goals per game. The season-long BTTS rate stands at 80% for San Jose and 62% across the league, making a scenario in which both teams score more likely than BTTS - No, meaning that at least one team fails to score. This does not automatically imply a 0:0 draw or that neither team will score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

San Jose Earthquakes II have had matches with at least 2 goals in 90% of their games, while Minnesota United II have conceded an average of 2.2 goals over their last five matches. The hosts score an average of 2.33 goals at home, whereas the visitors concede 1.70 goals away, clearly supporting the likelihood of them finding the net. The San Jose side have recently created chances worth 1.88 xG per match, while Minnesota have allowed opponents 2.02 xG, making a goal for the visitors a realistic scenario as well. The league-wide average is 3.28 goals, and 66% of its matches have gone Over 2.5 goals, although Minnesota’s more inconsistent form reduces confidence in a high over. The strongest signal therefore remains Over 1.5, as the projected total of 3.05 goals provides a substantial margin above this line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time and a Minnesota win at full-time, as San Jose were level at the break in 50% of their matches, compared with 33% for Minnesota. However, the hosts have a clearly stronger potential to secure the final victory: they win 56% of their matches, compared with 30% for the visitors, score an average of 2.33 goals versus San Jose’s 1.70, and concede just 0.78 goals per game. Minnesota’s advantage is also evident after half-time, when they average 1.00 goal scored and 0.44 conceded, while their opponents concede as many as 1.30 goals after the interval. Recent form calls for caution, as the hosts have not led at the break in any of their last five matches, but San Jose’s poor defensive record and their 60% rate of second-half defeats favour a late turnaround in Minnesota’s direction.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
15Shots15
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
5Shots on target5
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1.75xG1.75
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
3Corners10
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
63Dangerous attacks64
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
6Fouls14
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
0Cards0
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1.38Goals scored / match2
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1.62Goals conceded / match1.26
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
48%Average possession51%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
4.24Shots on target / match5.16
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.52Shots per match13.79
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
4.24Shots on target5.16
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
10.2%Shot conversion14.5%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
48%Possession51%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1.58xG for1.64
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1.54xG against1.5
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II

Shooting quality

Minnesota United II: BalancedSan Jose Earthquakes II: Efficient finishing
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Accuracy (shots on target)31%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Minnesota United II
DLWLL
Season result split
38% W14% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-10
1.29 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 2.02BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
San Jose Earthquakes II
WLLLD
Season result split
42% W21% D37% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-7
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.90Opponent xG: 1.03BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

San Jose Earthquakes II is 45% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - Minnesota United II · 2 goals / match - San Jose Earthquakes II

San Jose Earthquakes II is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.62 goals / match - Minnesota United II · 1.26 goals / match - San Jose Earthquakes II

Minnesota United II scoring profile: very strong

Minnesota United II scores in 67% of matches (14 of 21 matches), while San Jose Earthquakes II keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).

San Jose Earthquakes II scoring profile: very strong

San Jose Earthquakes II scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Minnesota United II keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 matches).

29Goals scored (season)38
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
34Goals conceded (season)24
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
3Average goals in match3.26
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
6Goals scored (last 5)7
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
11Goals conceded (last 5)7
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal74%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
33%2 goals47%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
19%3 goals37%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
14%4 goals21%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal84%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
57%2 goals32%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
19%3 goals11%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
5%4 goals0%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
Minnesota United II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 21 matches
63%
San Jose Earthquakes II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 19 matches
61%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time26%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
14%BTTS in both halves11%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
29%Scored in both halves37%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
60%BTTS - last 540%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
52%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
24%Min. 3 goals before half-time26%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time37%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

San Jose Earthquakes II is 61% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.14 pts / match - Minnesota United II · 1.84 pts / match - San Jose Earthquakes II

Minnesota United II - half-time state
29% leading29% draw43% trailing
San Jose Earthquakes II - half-time state
47% leading42% draw11% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.14Points per match (1st half)1.84
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
0.67Goals scored (1st half)1.11
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
0.95Goals conceded (1st half)0.37
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1.62Average goals (1st half)1.47
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
38%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
52%No goal before half-time37%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.24Points per match (2nd half)1.26
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.89
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.89
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1.38Average goals (2nd half)1.79
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
52%Clean sheet after half-time42%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II
52%No goal after half-time53%
Minnesota United IISan Jose Earthquakes II

Minnesota United II - second-half results

29% W38% D33% L
24
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

San Jose Earthquakes II - second-half results

37% W16% D47% L
35
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+14
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.84
PPG before half-time
Lead holding89%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 42%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Minnesota United II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.00
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match1.40.8
Average goals in match2.01.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-4-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3
San Jose Earthquakes II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Minnesota United II
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
6
4
16-30
5
13
31-45
3
4
46-60
7
6
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

San Jose Earthquakes II
ScoredConceded
7
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
10
3
31-45
8
4
46-60
6
5
61-75
3
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Minnesota United II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

San Jose Earthquakes II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
142%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.67
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Minnesota United IILigaSan Jose Earthquakes II
Average goals in match 3.003.25 3.26
Both teams scored 52%61% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%66% 63%
Clean sheets 19%22% 16%
Goal before half-time 81%76% 74%
Goal after half-time 71%84% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.25
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.84
Home goals / match
1.41
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. San Jose Earthquakes IISubstitutionOn: Martin Kwende Jr.Off: Diogo Baptista
  2. Minnesota United IISubstitutionOn: Troy PuttOff: Jakob Friedman

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Minnesota United II 1 - 0 - 2 San Jose Earthquakes II. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.

San Jose Earthquakes II
1 : 0
Minnesota United II
Minnesota United FC II
1 : 0
San Jose Earthquakes II
San Jose Earthquakes II
3 : 2
Minnesota United FC II

FAQ

What was the result of Minnesota United II vs San Jose Earthquakes II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Minnesota United II 1:1 San Jose Earthquakes II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Minnesota United II and San Jose Earthquakes II?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Minnesota United II won 1, San Jose Earthquakes II won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Minnesota United II vs San Jose Earthquakes II?

Minnesota United II score 1.38 goals per game on average and San Jose Earthquakes II 2.00. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Minnesota United II's matches and 63% of San Jose Earthquakes II's.

What form are Minnesota United II and San Jose Earthquakes II in?

Over the last 5 games Minnesota United II have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and San Jose Earthquakes II 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Minnesota United II vs San Jose Earthquakes II?

The statistical background for Minnesota United II vs San Jose Earthquakes II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.