Minnesota United II vs San Jose Earthquakes II: match statistics
Minnesota United II vs San Jose Earthquakes II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Minnesota United II played San Jose Earthquakes II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 9 August 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Minnesota United II: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. San Jose Earthquakes II: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Minnesota United II scores 1.38 and concedes 1.62 goals per match. San Jose Earthquakes II scores 2.00 and concedes 1.26. League average: 3.25 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Minnesota United II 52%, San Jose Earthquakes II 63%. Over 2.5: Minnesota United II 57%, San Jose Earthquakes II 63%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.
xG, shots and style
San Jose Earthquakes II has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.58. Minnesota United II: 13.5 shots per match, San Jose Earthquakes II: 13.8.
Match halves
Minnesota United II: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.71. San Jose Earthquakes II: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.89.
Goals by minute
Minnesota United II: 61-75 (7 goals). San Jose Earthquakes II: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.25 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-2. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Minnesota United II have the home advantage: they average 1.7 goals per match at home, while their chances created are valued at 1.83 xG, higher than San Jose Earthquakes II’s 1.64 xG away from home. The hosts also register more shots on target at home, averaging 5.8 compared with the visitors’ 4.6, with almost identical finishing efficiency (11% versus 12%). However, both teams are in poor recent form, having each recorded 1 win, 1 draw and 3 defeats in their last five matches. During that period, Minnesota conceded 11 goals, while San Jose conceded 7. The visitors’ away defence offers little stability, as they concede an average of 1.7 goals and have kept a clean sheet in only 10% of such matches. Given Minnesota’s greater attacking potential at home, the hosts’ advantage appears slight but sufficient to indicate result 1.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - Yes tip is primarily supported by San Jose Earthquakes II’s defensive profile away from home: the team concedes an average of 1.70 goals, keeps a clean sheet in only 10% of matches, and their opponents create an average of 1.71 xG against them. At home, Minnesota United II scores an average of 2.33 goals with 5.78 shots on target per match, giving them a strong foundation to exploit this weakness. The visitors should, in turn, benefit from a clear decline in Minnesota’s defensive performance, with the hosts conceding 11 goals in their last 5 matches, or 2.2 per game, while opponents have recorded an average xG of 2.02. During this period, San Jose produced 1.88 xG per match and scored an average of 1.4 goals, which supports the expectation that they will find the net despite the hosts’ stronger season-long home defence, conceding 0.78 goals per game. The season-long BTTS rate stands at 80% for San Jose and 62% across the league, making a scenario in which both teams score more likely than BTTS - No, meaning that at least one team fails to score. This does not automatically imply a 0:0 draw or that neither team will score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
San Jose Earthquakes II have had matches with at least 2 goals in 90% of their games, while Minnesota United II have conceded an average of 2.2 goals over their last five matches. The hosts score an average of 2.33 goals at home, whereas the visitors concede 1.70 goals away, clearly supporting the likelihood of them finding the net. The San Jose side have recently created chances worth 1.88 xG per match, while Minnesota have allowed opponents 2.02 xG, making a goal for the visitors a realistic scenario as well. The league-wide average is 3.28 goals, and 66% of its matches have gone Over 2.5 goals, although Minnesota’s more inconsistent form reduces confidence in a high over. The strongest signal therefore remains Over 1.5, as the projected total of 3.05 goals provides a substantial margin above this line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time and a Minnesota win at full-time, as San Jose were level at the break in 50% of their matches, compared with 33% for Minnesota. However, the hosts have a clearly stronger potential to secure the final victory: they win 56% of their matches, compared with 30% for the visitors, score an average of 2.33 goals versus San Jose’s 1.70, and concede just 0.78 goals per game. Minnesota’s advantage is also evident after half-time, when they average 1.00 goal scored and 0.44 conceded, while their opponents concede as many as 1.30 goals after the interval. Recent form calls for caution, as the hosts have not led at the break in any of their last five matches, but San Jose’s poor defensive record and their 60% rate of second-half defeats favour a late turnaround in Minnesota’s direction.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Minnesota United II | San Jose Earthquakes II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
San Jose Earthquakes II is 45% better for: goals scored per match.
1.38 goals / match - Minnesota United II · 2 goals / match - San Jose Earthquakes II
San Jose Earthquakes II is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.62 goals / match - Minnesota United II · 1.26 goals / match - San Jose Earthquakes II
Minnesota United II scores in 67% of matches (14 of 21 matches), while San Jose Earthquakes II keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).
San Jose Earthquakes II scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Minnesota United II keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Minnesota United II
Over / Under - San Jose Earthquakes II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
San Jose Earthquakes II is 61% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.14 pts / match - Minnesota United II · 1.84 pts / match - San Jose Earthquakes II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Minnesota United II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
San Jose Earthquakes II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 42%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Minnesota United II
San Jose Earthquakes II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Minnesota United II | Liga | San Jose Earthquakes II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.00 | 3.25 | • 3.26 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 52% | 61% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 57% | 66% | ▼ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 22% | ▼ 16% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 76% | ▼ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 84% | • 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Minnesota United II 1 - 0 - 2 San Jose Earthquakes II. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Minnesota United II vs San Jose Earthquakes II?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Minnesota United II 1:1 San Jose Earthquakes II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Minnesota United II and San Jose Earthquakes II?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Minnesota United II won 1, San Jose Earthquakes II won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Minnesota United II vs San Jose Earthquakes II?
Minnesota United II score 1.38 goals per game on average and San Jose Earthquakes II 2.00. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Minnesota United II's matches and 63% of San Jose Earthquakes II's.
What form are Minnesota United II and San Jose Earthquakes II in?
Over the last 5 games Minnesota United II have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and San Jose Earthquakes II 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Minnesota United II vs San Jose Earthquakes II?
The statistical background for Minnesota United II vs San Jose Earthquakes II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


