United States - MLS Next ProAllianz FieldData current as of 23 October 2026

Minnesota United II vs Whitecaps II: match statistics

Minnesota United II vs Whitecaps II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Minnesota United II played Whitecaps II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 13 September 2026. Venue: Allianz Field. Final score: 5:1.

Current form

Minnesota United II: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Whitecaps II: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Minnesota United II scores 1.40 and concedes 1.44 goals per match. Whitecaps II scores 1.50 and concedes 2.08. League average: 3.34 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Minnesota United II 52%, Whitecaps II 73%. Over 2.5: Minnesota United II 48%, Whitecaps II 69%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 67%.

xG, shots and style

Minnesota United II has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.66. Minnesota United II: 14.2 shots per match, Whitecaps II: 12.9.

Match halves

Minnesota United II: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.80. Whitecaps II: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.88.

Goals by minute

Minnesota United II: 61-75 (9 goals). Whitecaps II: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.34 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 67%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Minnesota United II has a clearly stronger home profile: they average 1.67 goals scored, with an xG of 1.93, while Whitecaps II score only 1.08 goals per away match. The key factor is the visitors’ defensive weakness: away from home, they concede as many as 2.46 goals per game and allow opponents an average xG of 1.90. Minnesota have conceded just 4 goals in their last five matches while scoring 7, recording 2 wins, 2 draws and only 1 defeat. Whitecaps II remain winless away from home this season, losing 77% of such matches and posting a negative goal difference of -18. The visitors have managed to score 12 goals in their last five matches, so a goal for them is a realistic possibility; however, the hosts’ superiority in chance creation and defensive organization points to outcome 1.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for goals from both sides is strong, as BTTS occurred in 69% of Minnesota United II matches and as many as 77% of Whitecaps II fixtures, compared with the league average of 62%. The hosts score an average of 1.92 goals per match, while the visitors’ defense concedes as many as 2.46, strongly supporting a goal for Minnesota United II. Whitecaps II score just 1.08 goals on average, but Minnesota kept a clean sheet in only 8% of matches, while the visitors’ xG stands at a solid 1.42. In their last five matches, the visitors recorded BTTS in 80% of cases, scoring 12 goals and conceding 10, with their average xG reaching 1.79. Additionally, both teams frequently combine a high goal tally with goals at both ends: this scenario occurred in 62% of the hosts’ matches and 69% of the visitors’ matches.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Minnesota United II score an average of 1.92 goals, while Whitecaps II concede as many as 2.46 goals per match, clearly strengthening the case for the home side’s goal tally. The quality-of-chances data is also strong: Minnesota’s average xG stands at 1.89, whereas Whitecaps II allow an average of 1.90 xG. At least 2 goals were scored in 92% of Minnesota’s matches and 77% of Whitecaps II’s games, while both teams keep clean sheets very rarely— in 8% and 15% of matches, respectively. The visitors have scored 12 goals in their last 5 matches but have also conceded 10, which is why Over 1.5 goals is the strongest pick with a projected total of 3.39 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Minnesota United II win, as the hosts have been level at the break in each of their last five matches and conceded only 0.4 goals before half-time during that span. Across the season, Minnesota have averaged 1.92 goals at home, while Whitecaps II have conceded as many as 2.46 goals per away game, clearly strengthening the hosts’ prospects after the interval. Minnesota score an average of 1.08 goals in second halves, and their matches produce an average of 2.15 goals after the break. Whitecaps II have not led at half-time in any match this season, were trailing at the interval in 54% of their appearances, and their final results are extremely poor: a 0% win rate and 77% defeat rate. The visitors’ current form increases the risk, as they have averaged 2.4 goals scored in their last five matches; however, their average of 2.0 goals conceded per game still points to a late turnaround in Minnesota’s favour.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

4 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
25Shots13
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
12Shots on target2
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
2.78xG1.26
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
9Corners6
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
52Dangerous attacks41
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
9Fouls18
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
0Cards3
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
1.4Goals scored / match1.5
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
1.44Goals conceded / match2.08
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
49%Average possession49%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
4.48Shots on target / match4.54
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.16Shots per match12.92
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
4.48Shots on target4.54
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
9.9%Shot conversion11.6%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
49%Possession49%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
1.67xG for1.66
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
1.52xG against1.8
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II

Shooting quality

Minnesota United II: AttackingWhitecaps II: Balanced
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
Accuracy (shots on target)32%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Minnesota United II is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Minnesota United II · 1.4 pts / match - Whitecaps II

Minnesota United II
LDDWW
Season result split
40% W20% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-5-10
1.40 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-3
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.00Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
Whitecaps II
LLWWD
Season result split
27% W15% D58% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-15
0.96 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-10
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LDLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Whitecaps II is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

1.4 goals / match - Minnesota United II · 1.5 goals / match - Whitecaps II

Minnesota United II is 44% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.44 goals / match - Minnesota United II · 2.08 goals / match - Whitecaps II

Minnesota United II scoring profile: very strong

Minnesota United II scores in 72% of matches (18 of 25 matches), while Whitecaps II keeps a clean sheet in 12% (3 of 26 matches).

Whitecaps II scoring profile: very strong

Whitecaps II scores in 77% of matches (20 of 26 matches), while Minnesota United II keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 matches).

35Goals scored (season)39
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
36Goals conceded (season)54
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
2.84Average goals in match3.58
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
7Goals scored (last 5)12
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
4Goals conceded (last 5)10
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal77%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
36%2 goals46%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
16%3 goals15%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
12%4 goals8%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal88%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
48%2 goals58%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
16%3 goals35%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
4%4 goals19%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
Minnesota United II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 25 matches
63%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time31%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
12%BTTS in both halves12%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
24%Scored in both halves19%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS65%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
60%BTTS - last 580%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

72%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
48%Min. 2 goals before half-time58%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time62%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time38%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Minnesota United II is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.12 pts / match - Minnesota United II · 1 pts / match - Whitecaps II

Minnesota United II - half-time state
24% leading40% draw36% trailing
Whitecaps II - half-time state
19% leading42% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.12Points per match (1st half)1
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.62
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
0.84Goals conceded (1st half)0.96
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
1.44Average goals (1st half)1.58
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
44%Clean sheet before half-time42%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
56%No goal before half-time58%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.36Points per match (2nd half)1
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)1.12
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
1.4Average goals (2nd half)2
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
56%Clean sheet after half-time23%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II
48%No goal after half-time46%
Minnesota United IIWhitecaps II

Minnesota United II - second-half results

32% W40% D28% L
28
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.12
PPG before half-time
Lead holding167%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Whitecaps II - second-half results

23% W31% D46% L
26
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding142%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Minnesota United II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Whitecaps II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match1.01.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match2.02.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Minnesota United II
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
7
4
16-30
5
14
31-45
5
4
46-60
9
7
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Whitecaps II
ScoredConceded
6
9
0-15
6
6
16-30
4
10
31-45
7
13
46-60
8
7
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.21
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+25%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Minnesota United II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Whitecaps II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Minnesota United IILigaWhitecaps II
Average goals in match▼ 2.843.34▲ 3.58
Both teams scored▼ 52%63%▲ 73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 48%67%▲ 69%
Clean sheets▲ 24%21%▼ 12%
Goal before half-time▼ 72%76%▼ 69%
Goal after half-time▼ 72%85%▼ 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.34
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.91
Home goals / match
1.43
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
58%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Minnesota United IIGoalAlisa Randell
  2. Whitecaps IIYellow cardValter Sedin
  3. Minnesota United IIGoalAlisa Randell
  4. Minnesota United IIGoalAlisa Randell
  5. Whitecaps IIYellow cardManav Badwal
  6. Whitecaps IISubstitutionOn: Tyler BrownOff: Manav Badwal
  7. Whitecaps IIGoalTyler BrownAssist: Carson Rassak
  8. Whitecaps IISubstitutionOn: Aiden BejaouiOff: Kevin Podgorni
  9. Minnesota United IISubstitutionOn: Troy PuttOff: Mamadou Dieng
  10. Minnesota United IIGoalJordan Adebayo-SmithAssist: Alpha Kabia

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Minnesota United II 0 - 0 - 2 Whitecaps II. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Whitecaps II
2 : 1
Minnesota United II
Minnesota United FC II
2 : 3
Vancouver Whitecaps FC II

FAQ

What was the result of Minnesota United II vs Whitecaps II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Minnesota United II 5:1 Whitecaps II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Minnesota United II and Whitecaps II?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Minnesota United II won 0, Whitecaps II won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Minnesota United II vs Whitecaps II?

Minnesota United II score 1.40 goals per game on average and Whitecaps II 1.50. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Minnesota United II's matches and 73% of Whitecaps II's.

What form are Minnesota United II and Whitecaps II in?

Over the last 5 games Minnesota United II have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Whitecaps II 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Minnesota United II vs Whitecaps II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.