United States - MLSAllianz FieldData current as of 31 August 2026

Minnesota United vs Orlando City: match statistics

Minnesota United vs Orlando City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Minnesota United played Orlando City in MLS (United States). The match was played on 30 August 2026. Venue: Allianz Field. Final score: 3:3.

Current form

Minnesota United: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Orlando City: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Minnesota United scores 1.29 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. Orlando City scores 1.62 and concedes 2.43. League average: 3.19 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Minnesota United 62%, Orlando City 67%. Over 2.5: Minnesota United 52%, Orlando City 71%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Minnesota United has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.41. Minnesota United: 13.2 shots per match, Orlando City: 12.3.

Match halves

Minnesota United: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.76. Orlando City: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Minnesota United: 61-75 (7 goals). Orlando City: 16-30 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.19 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Minnesota United have shown significantly more consistent form: they have collected 8 points in their last five matches, compared with Orlando City’s 5, while the goal difference over that period stands at 10:5. At home, the hosts concede just 0.8 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in 40% of fixtures, whereas Orlando allow their opponents as many as 3.4 goals on average away from home. Minnesota create chances worth an average of 1.54 xG at home, more than Orlando’s 1.35 xG in away matches, while the visitors’ defense allows 2.06 xG. Orlando score 1.5 goals per away match and have a 13% conversion rate, but they have lost 70% of such fixtures and kept just one clean sheet in ten matches. The hosts often draw at home, sharing the points in 50% of their matches, but Orlando’s major defensive weakness should tip the balance in Minnesota’s favor.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Minnesota United records BTTS in 82% of matches, well above the MLS league average of 63%, while Orlando City stands at 50%; however, over the teams’ last five matches, these figures have risen to 80% and 100%, respectively. The hosts score an average of 1.73 goals per match, compared with Orlando’s 1.50, while their averages over the last five fixtures are 2.0 and 1.4 goals. Minnesota has kept a clean sheet in only 9% of matches, while Orlando has done so in 10%, and the visitors concede as many as 3.4 goals per game this season. Their attacking potential is supported by an xG of 1.47 for Minnesota and 1.35 for Orlando, while the hosts allow opponents an xG of 1.69. The strongest signal points to BTTS - Yes: Minnesota should be able to exploit Orlando’s very weak defence, while the visitors have been scoring regularly in their recent form and will face a team that rarely keeps a clean sheet.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Minnesota score an average of 1.73 goals at home, while Orlando concede as many as 3.40 goals per away match, clearly strengthening the hosts’ attacking potential. At least two goals were scored in 82% of Minnesota’s matches and in all of Orlando’s games, while the Over 2.5 goals line landed in 64% and 80% of cases, respectively. Both teams regularly create chances: average xG stands at 1.47 for Minnesota and 1.35 for Orlando, while the hosts record 4.73 shots on target per match compared with 5.00 for the visitors. Across their last five appearances, Minnesota averaged 2.0 goals and Orlando 1.4, with both teams scoring in 80% and 100% of matches, respectively. The strongest signal remains Over 1.5 goals, as the defenses keep clean sheets in only 9% and 10% of matches, while the projected total of 3.40 goals gives this line a very large safety margin.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Minnesota United have a clear advantage in the first halves: they led at the break in 36% of matches, while Orlando City were trailing after 45 minutes in as many as 70% of games. The hosts average 0.73 goals scored and concede just 0.64 before half-time, whereas the visitors concede as many as 1.80 goals away from home during this phase, while scoring only 0.50. Minnesota’s advantage should persist after the interval, as Orlando concede an average of 3.40 goals in full matches, while Minnesota score 1.73 at home. Recent results also support this assessment: in their previous five matches, the hosts averaged 2.0 goals scored and 1.0 conceded, compared with Orlando’s 1.4 scored and 1.6 conceded. The HT/FT scenario of Minnesota leading at the break and securing the final victory is therefore the strongest-supported outcome, based on both the difference in defensive quality and the teams’ first-half profiles.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
3 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
21Shots6
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
9Shots on target5
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
2.38xG0.92
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
8Corners1
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
60Dangerous attacks24
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
13Fouls10
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
2Cards2
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
1.29Goals scored / match1.62
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
1.38Goals conceded / match2.43
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
46%Average possession48%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
4.81Shots on target / match4.86
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.19Shots per match12.33
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
4.81Shots on target4.86
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
9.7%Shot conversion13.1%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
46%Possession48%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
1.5xG for1.41
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
1.43xG against1.86
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City

Shooting quality

Minnesota United: BalancedOrlando City: Efficient finishing
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
Accuracy (shots on target)36%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Orlando City is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Minnesota United · 1.4 pts / match - Orlando City

Minnesota United
DDDLW
Season result split
33% W33% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-7-7
1.33 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-5-3
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
LDDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Orlando City
WLDLW
Season result split
33% W14% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-11
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-7
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Orlando City is 26% better for: goals scored per match.

1.29 goals / match - Minnesota United · 1.62 goals / match - Orlando City

Minnesota United is 76% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.38 goals / match - Minnesota United · 2.43 goals / match - Orlando City

Minnesota United scoring profile: very strong

Minnesota United scores in 76% of matches (16 of 21 matches), while Orlando City keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 21 matches).

Orlando City scoring profile: very strong

Orlando City scores in 76% of matches (16 of 21 matches), while Minnesota United keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 matches).

27Goals scored (season)34
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
29Goals conceded (season)51
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
2.67Average goals in match4.05
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
8Goals scored (last 5)7
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal76%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
33%2 goals48%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
10%3 goals19%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
5%4 goals19%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal90%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
38%2 goals57%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
10%3 goals43%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
5%4 goals24%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
Minnesota United - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 21 matches
63%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time19%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
5%BTTS in both halves5%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
14%Scored in both halves24%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS52%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
80%BTTS - last 580%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time57%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time95%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time62%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time38%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Minnesota United - half-time state
24% leading33% draw43% trailing
Orlando City - half-time state
29% leading19% draw52% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.05Points per match (1st half)1.05
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
0.52Goals scored (1st half)0.62
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
0.81Goals conceded (1st half)1.19
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
1.33Average goals (1st half)1.81
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
38%Clean sheet before half-time38%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
62%No goal before half-time57%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.48Points per match (2nd half)1.29
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)1
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)1.24
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
1.33Average goals (2nd half)2.24
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
48%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City
48%No goal after half-time43%
Minnesota UnitedOrlando City

Minnesota United - second-half results

33% W48% R19% P
22
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Orlando City - second-half results

38% W14% R48% P
22
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Minnesota United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Orlando City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.202.60
Goals scored / match0.01.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference-5+5
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Minnesota United
ScoredConceded
3
8
0-15
2
5
16-30
6
4
31-45
4
6
46-60
7
2
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Orlando City
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
9
9
16-30
2
10
31-45
8
9
46-60
7
5
61-75
6
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.36
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Minnesota United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Orlando City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.57
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
133%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Minnesota UnitedLigaOrlando City
Average goals in match 2.673.19 4.05
Both teams scored 62%63% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%61% 71%
Clean sheets 24%20% 10%
Goal before half-time 76%77% 86%
Goal after half-time 71%81% 95%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.19
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.83
Home goals / match
1.36
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Orlando CityGoalDaryl Dike
  2. Minnesota UnitedYellow cardAnthony Markanich
  3. Minnesota UnitedSubstitutionOn: Alec SmirOff: Drake Callender
  4. Orlando CityYellow cardAntoine Griezmann
  5. Orlando CityGoalAntoine GriezmannAssist: Justin Ellis
  6. Minnesota UnitedYellow cardMichael Boxall
  7. Minnesota UnitedGoalMarcus CaldeiraAssist: Kelvin Kwarteng Yeboah
  8. Orlando CitySubstitutionOn: Tyrese SpicerOff: Justin Ellis
  9. Minnesota UnitedGoalAnthony MarkanichAssist: Joaquín Nicolás Pereyra
  10. Minnesota UnitedGoalKelvin Kwarteng Yeboah
  11. Minnesota UnitedSubstitutionOn: Tomás Alejandro ChancalayOff: Kelvin Kwarteng Yeboah
  12. Minnesota UnitedSubstitutionOn: Carlos Miguel Harvey CesnerosOff: Joaquín Nicolás Pereyra
  13. Orlando CityYellow cardMarco Pasalic
  14. Orlando CityGoalTyrese SpicerAssist: Antoine Griezmann

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Minnesota United vs Orlando City?

The MLS match finished Minnesota United 3:3 Orlando City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Minnesota United vs Orlando City?

Minnesota United score 1.29 goals per game on average and Orlando City 1.62. The MLS average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Minnesota United's matches and 67% of Orlando City's.

What form are Minnesota United and Orlando City in?

Over the last 5 games Minnesota United have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Orlando City 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Minnesota United vs Orlando City?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Minnesota United vs Orlando City: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.