Mito Hollyhock vs Kashima Antlers: match statistics
Mito Hollyhock vs Kashima Antlers: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Mito Hollyhock played Kashima Antlers in J1 League (Japan). The match was played on 2 September 2026. Venue: K's denki Stadium Mito. Final score: 4:2.
Current form
Mito Hollyhock: 1-2-1, 1.25 points/match. Kashima Antlers: 4-0-0, 3.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Mito Hollyhock scores 1.50 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Kashima Antlers scores 2.75 and concedes 1.50. League average: 3.05 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Mito Hollyhock 100%, Kashima Antlers 75%. Over 2.5: Mito Hollyhock 50%, Kashima Antlers 75%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Kashima Antlers has higher xG: 1.84 vs 1.52. Mito Hollyhock: 15.5 shots per match, Kashima Antlers: 18.3.
Match halves
Mito Hollyhock: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50. Kashima Antlers: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.75.
Goals by minute
Mito Hollyhock: 16-30 (3 goals). Kashima Antlers: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
J1 League: 3.05 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kashima Antlers are unbeaten this season, having won all 3 league matches, while their last five games produced a perfect 5 wins and a 14:6 goal difference. The visitors create significantly more chances: away from home, they average 21 shots and 5 on target, compared with Mito’s 17 shots and 4 on target, while their average xG stands at 2.12 versus 1.58 for the hosts. Kashima’s finishing has been highly efficient, converting 19% of their shots, whereas Mito convert just 6%, which further underlines the visitors’ advantage. Mito have scored only 5 goals in their three league matches this season, and have lost 3 of their last five games, conceding an average of 1.4 goals per match. The hosts are yet to lose at home, but have recorded only a draw there, while Kashima won their only away fixture and should be able to capitalise on their superior attacking quality.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The seasonal signal for BTTS is very strong: both teams have recorded this outcome in 100% of their matches, and neither has kept a clean sheet yet. Mito scores an average of 2.5 goals but concedes 1.5, while Kashima scores as many as 4.0 goals and concedes 3.0, clearly favouring goals at both ends. In their last five matches, both teams’ BTTS rate has dropped to 60%; however, Mito has an xG of 1.58 and allows opponents an xG of 1.62, while Kashima records 1.67 and 1.45 respectively. The visitors are on a five-match winning streak and have scored 14 goals during this period, but the 6 goals they have conceded give the hosts a realistic chance of finding the net. BTTS - Yes remains the better choice compared with the league average of 63%, although Mito’s lower scoring efficiency in recent matches reduces confidence in the prediction.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match profile clearly favors goals: both teams have recorded over 1.5 goals in 100% of their league matches so far, while the league average stands at a high 3.2 goals. Kashima have averaged 2.8 goals in their last five matches, compared with Mito’s 1.0, but the hosts are creating an average of 1.58 xG and should capitalize on the fact that their opponents allow 1.45 xG. The visitors are particularly dangerous in attack, averaging 21.0 shots and 5.0 shots on target per match, while Mito have conceded an average of 1.4 goals in their last five appearances. The 2.5-goal line has been surpassed in 80% of Kashima’s last five matches, but Mito’s lower attacking efficiency limits confidence in the Over 2.5 goals option. The strongest selection remains Over 1.5 goals, as the combination of a projected 3.0 goals and the absence of clean sheets for either side significantly reduces the risk of a 0-0 or 1-0 result.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Kashima win, as the visitors were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches and went on to win all 5 games during this period. Mito were trailing at half-time in 60% of their last five appearances, while their average first-half output is just 0.6 goals, identical to their opponents’, increasing the likelihood of an evenly contested opening period. After the break, Kashima’s advantage becomes clear: they average 2.2 goals across their last five matches, compared with just 0.4 for Mito, and won the second half in 80% of those games. The visitors are also in significantly better full-match form, collecting all 15 available points and recording a 14:6 goal difference in five matches, while Mito earned only 4 points and scored just 5 goals. Kashima’s higher xG of 2.12 compared with the hosts’ 1.45, along with 21 shots per match versus 13.5, further support the expectation that the visitors will take control after half-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Mito Hollyhock | Kashima Antlers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 27% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.55 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kashima Antlers is 140% better for: last-5 form.
1.25 pts / match - Mito Hollyhock · 3 pts / match - Kashima Antlers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kashima Antlers is 83% better for: goals scored per match.
1.5 goals / match - Mito Hollyhock · 2.75 goals / match - Kashima Antlers
Mito Hollyhock is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.25 goals / match - Mito Hollyhock · 1.5 goals / match - Kashima Antlers
Mito Hollyhock scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Kashima Antlers keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).
Kashima Antlers scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Mito Hollyhock keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mito Hollyhock
Over / Under - Kashima Antlers
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mito Hollyhock - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Kashima Antlers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.75 | 1.25 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.5 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 75% | 25% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 25% | 50% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.75 | 2.50 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.5 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 75% |
| 3 goals | 25% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 25% |
| No goal | 0% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Mito Hollyhock
Kashima Antlers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).
Teams vs league
| Mito Hollyhock | Liga | Kashima Antlers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.75 | 3.05 | ▲ 4.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 60% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 60% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 23% | ▲ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 78% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 80% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Mito Hollyhock vs Kashima Antlers?
The J1 League match finished Mito Hollyhock 4:2 Kashima Antlers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mito Hollyhock vs Kashima Antlers?
Mito Hollyhock score 1.50 goals per game on average and Kashima Antlers 2.75. The J1 League average is 3.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Mito Hollyhock's matches and 75% of Kashima Antlers's.
What form are Mito Hollyhock and Kashima Antlers in?
Over the last 5 games Mito Hollyhock have a 1-2-1 record (1.25 points per game) and Kashima Antlers 4-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mito Hollyhock vs Kashima Antlers?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mito Hollyhock vs Kashima Antlers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


