Japan - J1 LeagueK's denki Stadium MitoData current as of 16 October 2026

Mito Hollyhock vs Kashima Antlers: match statistics

Mito Hollyhock vs Kashima Antlers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mito Hollyhock played Kashima Antlers in J1 League (Japan). The match was played on 2 September 2026. Venue: K's denki Stadium Mito. Final score: 4:2.

Current form

Mito Hollyhock: 1-2-1, 1.25 points/match. Kashima Antlers: 4-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mito Hollyhock scores 1.50 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Kashima Antlers scores 2.75 and concedes 1.50. League average: 3.05 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mito Hollyhock 100%, Kashima Antlers 75%. Over 2.5: Mito Hollyhock 50%, Kashima Antlers 75%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 60%.

xG, shots and style

Kashima Antlers has higher xG: 1.84 vs 1.52. Mito Hollyhock: 15.5 shots per match, Kashima Antlers: 18.3.

Match halves

Mito Hollyhock: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50. Kashima Antlers: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.75.

Goals by minute

Mito Hollyhock: 16-30 (3 goals). Kashima Antlers: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

J1 League: 3.05 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 60%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kashima Antlers are unbeaten this season, having won all 3 league matches, while their last five games produced a perfect 5 wins and a 14:6 goal difference. The visitors create significantly more chances: away from home, they average 21 shots and 5 on target, compared with Mito’s 17 shots and 4 on target, while their average xG stands at 2.12 versus 1.58 for the hosts. Kashima’s finishing has been highly efficient, converting 19% of their shots, whereas Mito convert just 6%, which further underlines the visitors’ advantage. Mito have scored only 5 goals in their three league matches this season, and have lost 3 of their last five games, conceding an average of 1.4 goals per match. The hosts are yet to lose at home, but have recorded only a draw there, while Kashima won their only away fixture and should be able to capitalise on their superior attacking quality.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The seasonal signal for BTTS is very strong: both teams have recorded this outcome in 100% of their matches, and neither has kept a clean sheet yet. Mito scores an average of 2.5 goals but concedes 1.5, while Kashima scores as many as 4.0 goals and concedes 3.0, clearly favouring goals at both ends. In their last five matches, both teams’ BTTS rate has dropped to 60%; however, Mito has an xG of 1.58 and allows opponents an xG of 1.62, while Kashima records 1.67 and 1.45 respectively. The visitors are on a five-match winning streak and have scored 14 goals during this period, but the 6 goals they have conceded give the hosts a realistic chance of finding the net. BTTS - Yes remains the better choice compared with the league average of 63%, although Mito’s lower scoring efficiency in recent matches reduces confidence in the prediction.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match profile clearly favors goals: both teams have recorded over 1.5 goals in 100% of their league matches so far, while the league average stands at a high 3.2 goals. Kashima have averaged 2.8 goals in their last five matches, compared with Mito’s 1.0, but the hosts are creating an average of 1.58 xG and should capitalize on the fact that their opponents allow 1.45 xG. The visitors are particularly dangerous in attack, averaging 21.0 shots and 5.0 shots on target per match, while Mito have conceded an average of 1.4 goals in their last five appearances. The 2.5-goal line has been surpassed in 80% of Kashima’s last five matches, but Mito’s lower attacking efficiency limits confidence in the Over 2.5 goals option. The strongest selection remains Over 1.5 goals, as the combination of a projected 3.0 goals and the absence of clean sheets for either side significantly reduces the risk of a 0-0 or 1-0 result.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Kashima win, as the visitors were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches and went on to win all 5 games during this period. Mito were trailing at half-time in 60% of their last five appearances, while their average first-half output is just 0.6 goals, identical to their opponents’, increasing the likelihood of an evenly contested opening period. After the break, Kashima’s advantage becomes clear: they average 2.2 goals across their last five matches, compared with just 0.4 for Mito, and won the second half in 80% of those games. The visitors are also in significantly better full-match form, collecting all 15 available points and recording a 14:6 goal difference in five matches, while Mito earned only 4 points and scored just 5 goals. Kashima’s higher xG of 2.12 compared with the hosts’ 1.45, along with 21 shots per match versus 13.5, further support the expectation that the visitors will take control after half-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
2 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

25Possession (%)75
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
7Shots16
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
5Shots on target5
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
0.96xG1.88
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
2Corners4
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
22Dangerous attacks70
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
7Fouls5
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
1Cards1
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
1.5Goals scored / match2.75
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
1.25Goals conceded / match1.5
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
40%Average possession60%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
4.25Shots on target / match5
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.5Shots per match18.25
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
4.25Shots on target5
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
9.7%Shot conversion15.1%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
40%Possession60%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
1.52xG for1.84
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
1.66xG against1.19
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers

Shooting quality

Mito Hollyhock: AttackingKashima Antlers: Dominant
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
Accuracy (shots on target)27%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.10
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.55

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kashima Antlers is 140% better for: last-5 form.

1.25 pts / match - Mito Hollyhock · 3 pts / match - Kashima Antlers

Mito Hollyhock
LDWD
Season result split
25% W50% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-1
1.25 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-1
1.25 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-2-0
Last 5 at home
0-2-0
DD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 50%
Kashima Antlers
WWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 away
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.84Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 75%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kashima Antlers is 83% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Mito Hollyhock · 2.75 goals / match - Kashima Antlers

Mito Hollyhock is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.25 goals / match - Mito Hollyhock · 1.5 goals / match - Kashima Antlers

Mito Hollyhock scoring profile: very strong

Mito Hollyhock scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Kashima Antlers keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

Kashima Antlers scoring profile: very strong

Kashima Antlers scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Mito Hollyhock keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).

6Goals scored (season)11
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
5Goals conceded (season)6
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
2.75Average goals in match4.25
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
6Goals scored (last 5)11
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
25%2 goals100%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
25%3 goals50%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
0%4 goals25%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal75%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
25%2 goals50%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
0%3 goals25%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
0%4 goals0%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time50%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
0%BTTS in both halves50%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
25%Scored in both halves100%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS75%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
100%BTTS - last 575%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
75%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time75%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mito Hollyhock - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing
Kashima Antlers - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.75Points per match (1st half)1.75
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
1Goals scored (1st half)1
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
1.75Average goals (1st half)1.75
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
25%No goal before half-time0%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per match (2nd half)2.5
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)1.75
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
1Average goals (2nd half)2.5
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
50%Clean sheet after half-time25%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
50%No goal after half-time0%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers

Mito Hollyhock - second-half results

25% W50% D25% L
7
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kashima Antlers - second-half results

75% W25% D0% L
7
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mito Hollyhock - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.751.25
Goals scored / match1.00.5
Goals conceded / match0.80.5
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal100%75%
2 goals75%25%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal25%50%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 50% leading - 25% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 50% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 4
Kashima Antlers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.752.50
Goals scored / match1.01.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.82.5
1 goal100%100%
2 goals50%75%
3 goals25%50%
Clean sheet50%25%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 50% leading - 25% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 75% won - 25% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mito Hollyhock
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
3
0
16-30
1
2
31-45
0
0
46-60
2
1
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Kashima Antlers
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
2
1
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
0
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
88%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mito Hollyhock

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Kashima Antlers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.65
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.91
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
186%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).

Teams vs league

Mito HollyhockLigaKashima Antlers
Average goals in match▼ 2.753.05▲ 4.25
Both teams scored▲ 100%60%▲ 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%60%▲ 75%
Clean sheets▼ 0%23%▲ 25%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%78%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▼ 75%80%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.05
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / match
1.48
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Kashima AntlersYellow cardTomoki Hayakawa
  2. Mito HollyhockGoalArata Watanabe
  3. Mito HollyhockGoalArata WatanabeAssist: Yoshiki Torikai
  4. Mito HollyhockGoalArata WatanabeAssist: Taishi Semba
  5. Kashima AntlersGoalLeonardo de Sousa PereiraAssist: Yuma Suzuki
  6. Mito HollyhockGoalArata WatanabeAssist: Yoshiki Torikai
  7. Kashima AntlersSubstitutionOn: Kyosuke TagawaOff: Rikuto Hirose
  8. Mito HollyhockYellow cardKotaro Uchino
  9. Kashima AntlersSubstitutionOn: Keisuke TsukuiOff: Gaku Shibasaki
  10. Kashima AntlersGoalLeonardo de Sousa PereiraAssist: Keisuke Tsukui
  11. Mito HollyhockSubstitutionOn: Rei IeizumiOff: Koshi Osaki

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Mito Hollyhock vs Kashima Antlers?

The J1 League match finished Mito Hollyhock 4:2 Kashima Antlers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mito Hollyhock vs Kashima Antlers?

Mito Hollyhock score 1.50 goals per game on average and Kashima Antlers 2.75. The J1 League average is 3.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Mito Hollyhock's matches and 75% of Kashima Antlers's.

What form are Mito Hollyhock and Kashima Antlers in?

Over the last 5 games Mito Hollyhock have a 1-2-1 record (1.25 points per game) and Kashima Antlers 4-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mito Hollyhock vs Kashima Antlers?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mito Hollyhock vs Kashima Antlers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.