Mito Hollyhock vs Kawasaki Frontale: match statistics
Mito Hollyhock vs Kawasaki Frontale: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Mito Hollyhock played Kawasaki Frontale in J1 League (Japan). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: K's denki Stadium Mito. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Mito Hollyhock: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Kawasaki Frontale: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Mito Hollyhock scores 1.83 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Kawasaki Frontale scores 2.00 and concedes 1.50. League average: 3.03 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Mito Hollyhock 100%, Kawasaki Frontale 100%. Over 2.5: Mito Hollyhock 50%, Kawasaki Frontale 67%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 58%.
xG, shots and style
Kawasaki Frontale has higher xG: 1.83 vs 1.35. Mito Hollyhock: 13.2 shots per match, Kawasaki Frontale: 17.3.
Match halves
Mito Hollyhock: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.83. Kawasaki Frontale: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Mito Hollyhock: 16-30 (4 goals). Kawasaki Frontale: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
J1 League: 3.03 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 58%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Mito Hollyhock remain unbeaten at home, winning 1 of their 3 matches and drawing the other 2, while Kawasaki Frontale have failed to win any of their three away games. The hosts average 2.00 goals per match at home—twice as many as the visitors score away from home, where their average stands at 1.00. Kawasaki do create slightly better chances on the road, with an average xG of 1.53 compared with Mito’s 1.29, but Mito are far more clinical, converting 16% of their shots versus 7%. Both defences concede 1.33 goals per match and neither side has kept a clean sheet, making a draw a realistic outcome. However, I give Mito a slight edge, as they have scored 9 goals in their last five matches and are clearly more efficient at home.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS signal is very strong, as both teams have recorded goals at both ends in 100% of their matches this season, compared with the league average of 60%. Mito score an average of 3.0 goals, while Kawasaki average 1.0, with neither side having kept a clean sheet yet; they concede 1.67 and 1.33 goals per match, respectively. Recent form also supports goals for both teams: BTTS landed in 80% of Mito’s last five matches and in 100% of Kawasaki’s games, while both teams conceded 1.4 goals per match during this period. Their attacking potential is confirmed by xG: the hosts create an average of 2.12 xG, while the visitors record 1.53 xG, with their opponents allowing 1.58 and 1.60 xG, respectively. A No Goal scenario for one of the teams is less likely, although Kawasaki’s lower conversion rate of 7% compared with Mito’s 15% slightly reduces confidence in the pick.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have recorded at least two goals in 100% of their league matches, and neither has kept a clean sheet yet. Mito average 3.00 goals scored at home and create chances worth 2.12 xG, while Kawasaki have scored in every match and average 1.53 xG. In their last five appearances, the teams scored 9 and 12 goals respectively, while both conceded 7, supporting the prediction of an open game. The league average stands at 3.00 goals, while the projected 3.10 goals in this match clearly favor the Over 1.5 goals bet.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Mito Hollyhock has a very strong first-half signal at home: they have led at the break in all three matches played so far, scoring an average of 2.0 goals before half-time. Kawasaki Frontale have yet to score in the first halves of their away matches, while in 67% of those games they went into the break level, reinforcing the scenario of the home side taking the initiative from the outset. The hosts win 67% of their home matches and score an average of 3.0 goals there, compared with the 1.0 goal scored by the visitors away from home. Mito also creates more chances, recording an xG of 2.12 and 7.33 shots on target per match, while Kawasaki has an xG of 1.53 and averages 4.0 shots on target. However, Kawasaki have shown better form over their last five matches, averaging 2.0 points per game, so draw or second-half turnaround scenarios remain relevant. Nevertheless, the most likely outcome is Mito leading at half-time and securing the full-time win.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Mito Hollyhock | Kawasaki Frontale | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Mito Hollyhock is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Mito Hollyhock · 1.6 pts / match - Kawasaki Frontale
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kawasaki Frontale is 9% better for: goals scored per match.
1.83 goals / match - Mito Hollyhock · 2 goals / match - Kawasaki Frontale
Mito Hollyhock is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.33 goals / match - Mito Hollyhock · 1.5 goals / match - Kawasaki Frontale
Mito Hollyhock scores in 100% of matches (6 of 6 matches), while Kawasaki Frontale keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 matches).
Kawasaki Frontale scores in 100% of matches (6 of 6 matches), while Mito Hollyhock keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mito Hollyhock
Over / Under - Kawasaki Frontale
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mito Hollyhock - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Kawasaki Frontale - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Mito Hollyhock
Kawasaki Frontale
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).
Teams vs league
| Mito Hollyhock | Liga | Kawasaki Frontale | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.17 | 3.03 | ▲ 3.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 61% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 58% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 22% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 71% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | • 83% | 84% | • 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Mito Hollyhock vs Kawasaki Frontale?
The J1 League match finished Mito Hollyhock 0:1 Kawasaki Frontale. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mito Hollyhock vs Kawasaki Frontale?
Mito Hollyhock score 1.83 goals per game on average and Kawasaki Frontale 2.00. The J1 League average is 3.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Mito Hollyhock's matches and 100% of Kawasaki Frontale's.
What form are Mito Hollyhock and Kawasaki Frontale in?
Over the last 5 games Mito Hollyhock have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Kawasaki Frontale 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mito Hollyhock vs Kawasaki Frontale?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mito Hollyhock vs Kawasaki Frontale: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.