Mito Hollyhock vs Oita Trinita: match statistics
Mito Hollyhock vs Oita Trinita: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Mito Hollyhock play Oita Trinita in J2 League (Japan). The match date is 29 November 2025 at 06:00. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Mito Hollyhock: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Oita Trinita: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Mito Hollyhock scores 1.45 and concedes 0.89 goals per match. Oita Trinita scores 0.71 and concedes 1.16. League average: 2.46 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Mito Hollyhock 50%, Oita Trinita 37%. Over 2.5: Mito Hollyhock 47%, Oita Trinita 32%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 45%.
xG, shots and style
Mito Hollyhock has higher xG: 1.36 vs 1.07. Mito Hollyhock: 11.4 shots per match, Oita Trinita: 8.8.
Match halves
Mito Hollyhock: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.79. Oita Trinita: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.37.
Goals by minute
Mito Hollyhock: 76-90+ (13 goals). Oita Trinita: 46-60 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
J2 League: 2.46 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 45%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Mito Hollyhock | Oita Trinita | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 27% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Mito Hollyhock is 200% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Mito Hollyhock · 0.6 pts / match - Oita Trinita
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mito Hollyhock is 104% better for: goals scored per match.
1.45 goals / match - Mito Hollyhock · 0.71 goals / match - Oita Trinita
Mito Hollyhock is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.89 goals / match - Mito Hollyhock · 1.16 goals / match - Oita Trinita
Mito Hollyhock scores in 82% of matches (31 of 38 matches), while Oita Trinita keeps a clean sheet in 34% (13 of 38 matches).
Oita Trinita scores in 55% of matches (21 of 38 matches), while Mito Hollyhock keeps a clean sheet in 42% (16 of 38 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Mito Hollyhock
Over / Under — Oita Trinita
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Mito Hollyhock is 66% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.79 pts / match - Mito Hollyhock · 1.08 pts / match - Oita Trinita
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mito Hollyhock - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Oita Trinita - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Mito Hollyhock
Oita Trinita
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J2 League).
Teams vs league
| Mito Hollyhock | Liga | Oita Trinita | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.34 | 2.46 | ▼ 1.87 |
| Both teams scored | • 50% | 51% | ▼ 37% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 47% | 45% | ▼ 32% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 42% | 29% | ▲ 34% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 61% | 68% | ▼ 66% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 76% | 74% | ▼ 63% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Mito Hollyhock 0 - 1 - 0 Oita Trinita. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Mito Hollyhock vs Oita Trinita?
The J2 League match finished Mito Hollyhock 2:0 Oita Trinita. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mito Hollyhock vs Oita Trinita?
Mito Hollyhock score 1.45 goals per game on average and Oita Trinita 0.71. The J2 League average is 2.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Mito Hollyhock's matches and 37% of Oita Trinita's.
What form are Mito Hollyhock and Oita Trinita in?
Over the last 5 games Mito Hollyhock have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Oita Trinita 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mito Hollyhock vs Oita Trinita?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mito Hollyhock vs Oita Trinita: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.