Sweden - AllsvenskanStrandvallenData current as of 21 October 2026

Mjällby vs Degerfors: match statistics

Mjällby
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Degerfors

Mjällby vs Degerfors: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mjällby played Degerfors in Allsvenskan (Sweden). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Venue: Strandvallen. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Mjällby: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Degerfors: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mjällby scores 1.23 and concedes 1.73 goals per match. Degerfors scores 0.86 and concedes 1.55. League average: 2.96 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mjällby 50%, Degerfors 36%. Over 2.5: Mjällby 50%, Degerfors 41%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Mjällby has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.24. Mjällby: 12.7 shots per match, Degerfors: 11.1.

Match halves

Mjällby: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.77. Degerfors: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.59.

Goals by minute

Mjällby: 76-90+ (8 goals). Degerfors: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Allsvenskan: 2.96 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Mjällby have a slight edge thanks to home advantage: they average 1.00 goals per match at home, while Degerfors score 0.73 away from home. The hosts also create better chances, averaging 1.65 xG compared with their opponents’ 1.23, and register more shots on target — 5.09 to 3.91. However, their finishing is a concern: they have failed to score in 55% of their home matches and have not won any of their last five games, conceding 11 goals in that run. Degerfors are also struggling, having lost four of their last five matches, and concede an average of 1.73 goals away from home. Mjällby’s greater chance creation gives them the edge, but both teams’ poor form makes a draw a realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

In matches involving both teams, both sides scored in 36% of cases, well below the league average of 53%. The biggest obstacle to that scenario is Degerfors’s attacking output: the visitors score an average of 0.73 goals per match and have failed to score in 55% of their games. They averaged just 0.4 goals over their last five matches, and BTTS - Yes did not land in any of them. Mjällby have also struggled to impress in attack, averaging 1.0 goal this season and 0.6 across their last five appearances. However, Degerfors concede an average of 1.73 goals, giving the hosts a chance to score. Despite both teams’ defensive weaknesses, it is more likely that at least one side will fail to score, so the pick is BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Fewer than 3.5 goals were scored in 82% of Mjällby’s matches and 91% of Degerfors’s, providing a clear signal in favor of this line. Both teams score sparingly: the hosts average 1.0 goals per match and the visitors 0.73; over their last five matches, those averages have fallen to 0.6 and 0.4, respectively. Although the defenses allow opponents chances worth an average xG of 1.49 and 1.63, the limited attacking output from both sides caps the expected total at around 2.35 goals. Under 3.5 goals is better supported than Under 2.5, as the lower line was exceeded in 45% of Mjällby’s matches and 36% of Degerfors’s.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time appears the most likely outcome: Mjällby were level at the break in 55% of their matches, while the figure was 60% for each team across their last five games. A cautious start is also supported by the fact that Degerfors failed to score before half-time in any of their last five matches, while Mjällby averaged 0.36 goals in the first half this season. After the break, the hosts could gain the upper hand, averaging 0.64 goals in the second half, while the visitors concede 1.00; Mjällby also averaged 1.36 points in second halves, compared with Degerfors’ 0.91. The visitors lost 64% of their matches this season and averaged 0.73 goals per game, compared with the hosts’ 1.00, supporting the scenario of a late Mjällby win. However, the X/1 pick carries risk, as the hosts have won none of their last five matches and conceded an average of 2.2 goals in those games.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
MjällbyDegerfors
13Shots8
MjällbyDegerfors
5Shots on target2
MjällbyDegerfors
1.71xG1.03
MjällbyDegerfors
7Corners5
MjällbyDegerfors
74Dangerous attacks53
MjällbyDegerfors
14Fouls16
MjällbyDegerfors
0Cards0
MjällbyDegerfors

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.23Goals scored / match0.86
MjällbyDegerfors
1.73Goals conceded / match1.55
MjällbyDegerfors
51%Average possession47%
MjällbyDegerfors
4.95Shots on target / match3.09
MjällbyDegerfors

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.73Shots per match11.05
MjällbyDegerfors
4.95Shots on target3.09
MjällbyDegerfors
9.6%Shot conversion7.8%
MjällbyDegerfors
51%Possession47%
MjällbyDegerfors
1.49xG for1.24
MjällbyDegerfors
1.73xG against1.56
MjällbyDegerfors

Shooting quality

Mjällby: BalancedDegerfors: Balanced
MjällbyDegerfors
Accuracy (shots on target)39%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Degerfors is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Mjällby · 0.6 pts / match - Degerfors

Mjällby
LLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
23% W32% D45% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-7-10
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-7
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.91BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Degerfors
LLWLL
Season result split
23% W18% D59% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-13
0.86 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-7
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mjällby is 43% better for: goals scored per match.

1.23 goals / match - Mjällby · 0.86 goals / match - Degerfors

Degerfors is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.73 goals / match - Mjällby · 1.55 goals / match - Degerfors

Mjällby scoring profile: very strong

Mjällby scores in 59% of matches (13 of 22 matches), while Degerfors keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 matches).

Degerfors scoring profile: strong

Degerfors scores in 50% of matches (11 of 22 matches), while Mjällby keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).

27Goals scored (season)19
MjällbyDegerfors
38Goals conceded (season)34
MjällbyDegerfors
2.95Average goals in match2.41
MjällbyDegerfors
3Goals scored (last 5)2
MjällbyDegerfors
11Goals conceded (last 5)7
MjällbyDegerfors

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal50%
MjällbyDegerfors
27%2 goals27%
MjällbyDegerfors
23%3 goals9%
MjällbyDegerfors
14%4 goals0%
MjällbyDegerfors

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal86%
MjällbyDegerfors
50%2 goals45%
MjällbyDegerfors
27%3 goals14%
MjällbyDegerfors
14%4 goals9%
MjällbyDegerfors

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time5%
MjällbyDegerfors
0%BTTS in both halves0%
MjällbyDegerfors
9%Scored in both halves14%
MjällbyDegerfors

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
MjällbyDegerfors
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
MjällbyDegerfors
60%BTTS - last 50%
MjällbyDegerfors

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
MjällbyDegerfors
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
MjällbyDegerfors
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
MjällbyDegerfors

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
MjällbyDegerfors
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
MjällbyDegerfors
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
MjällbyDegerfors

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mjällby is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Mjällby · 0.77 pts / match - Degerfors

Mjällby - half-time state
18% leading45% draw36% trailing
Degerfors - half-time state
14% leading36% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)0.77
MjällbyDegerfors
0.45Goals scored (1st half)0.27
MjällbyDegerfors
0.73Goals conceded (1st half)0.68
MjällbyDegerfors
1.18Average goals (1st half)0.95
MjällbyDegerfors
55%Clean sheet before half-time45%
MjällbyDegerfors
73%No goal before half-time82%
MjällbyDegerfors

After half-time (2nd half)

0.95Points per match (2nd half)1.14
MjällbyDegerfors
0.77Goals scored (2nd half)0.59
MjällbyDegerfors
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.86
MjällbyDegerfors
1.77Average goals (2nd half)1.45
MjällbyDegerfors
41%Clean sheet after half-time36%
MjällbyDegerfors
59%No goal after half-time55%
MjällbyDegerfors

Mjällby - second-half results

18% W41% D41% L
22
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding128%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Degerfors - second-half results

27% W32% D41% L
17
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding164%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mjällby - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.20
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.8
Average goals in match0.82.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference0-8
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Degerfors - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.80
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mjällby
ScoredConceded
4
6
0-15
4
6
16-30
2
4
31-45
7
11
46-60
2
7
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Degerfors
ScoredConceded
1
6
0-15
4
3
16-30
1
6
31-45
3
7
46-60
4
4
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.69
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+87%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
30%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
21%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mjällby

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Degerfors

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
64%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Allsvenskan).

Teams vs league

MjällbyLigaDegerfors
Average goals in match• 2.952.96▼ 2.41
Both teams scored▼ 50%53%▼ 36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%54%▼ 41%
Clean sheets▼ 18%26%▼ 14%
Goal before half-time▼ 64%68%• 68%
Goal after half-time▼ 73%80%▲ 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.96
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.63
Home goals / match
1.34
Away goals / match
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. DegerforsGoalArman TaranisAssist: Sebastian Ohlsson
  2. MjällbyGoalJeppe Kjær Jensen
  3. MjällbySubstitutionOn: Olle LindbergOff: Jeppe Kjær Jensen
  4. DegerforsSubstitutionOn: Dijan VukojevicOff: Arman Taranis
  5. MjällbySubstitutionOn: Axel NorénOff: Tony Miettinen
  6. DegerforsSubstitutionOn: Elias BarsoumOff: Nahom Girmai Netabay
  7. MjällbySubstitutionOn: Mads EnggårdOff: Áki Samuelsen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Mjällby 1 - 0 - 0 Degerfors. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Degerfors
1 : 4
Mjällby

FAQ

What was the result of Mjällby vs Degerfors?

The Allsvenskan match finished Mjällby 1:1 Degerfors. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mjällby vs Degerfors?

Mjällby score 1.23 goals per game on average and Degerfors 0.86. The Allsvenskan average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Mjällby's matches and 36% of Degerfors's.

What form are Mjällby and Degerfors in?

Over the last 5 games Mjällby have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Degerfors 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mjällby vs Degerfors?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.