Norway - EliteserienAker StadionData current as of 17 October 2026

Molde vs KFUM: match statistics

Molde crest
Molde
2 : 0half-time 1:0
KFUM crest
KFUM

Molde vs KFUM: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Molde played KFUM in Eliteserien (Norway). The match was played on 6 September 2026. Venue: Aker Stadion. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Molde: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. KFUM: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Molde scores 2.00 and concedes 1.61 goals per match. KFUM scores 1.11 and concedes 1.72. League average: 3.08 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Molde 72%, KFUM 56%. Over 2.5: Molde 67%, KFUM 56%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Molde has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.26. Molde: 14.9 shots per match, KFUM: 10.8.

Match halves

Molde: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.94. KFUM: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.39.

Goals by minute

Molde: 31-45+ (10 goals). KFUM: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Eliteserien: 3.08 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 1-2-2. Average goals 3.60, BTTS 80%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Molde have a clear home advantage: they win 67% of their home matches, score an average of 2.33 goals per game there, and lose just 22% of matches. KFUM win only 13% of their away games, concede an average of 2.38 goals per match, and have an away goal difference of -10. The hosts also create more chances, averaging 14.22 shots and an xG of 1.65, compared with 11.88 shots and an xG of 1.37 for the visitors. Both teams have won 3 of their last 5 matches, but Molde scored 22 goals during that period, while KFUM managed 9. Molde’s attacking edge and KFUM’s weak away defence point to a home win as the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is strengthened by KFUM’s very high season BTTS frequency of 75%, compared with 40% for Molde, while over the last five matches these figures stood at 60% and 80%, respectively. Molde are in excellent attacking form, averaging 4.4 goals across their last five games with an xG of 2.18, whereas KFUM have conceded as many as 2.38 goals per match on average this season. The visitors also create chances: their average xG is 1.37, they register 4.63 shots on target per match, and Molde allow opponents an xG of 1.50. The hosts keep a clean sheet in 40% of their matches, which is a significant argument against BTTS, but their last five games have produced an average of 2.0 goals conceded. Molde’s current attacking superiority and the vulnerability of both defences make a goal for each team the more likely scenario, supporting BTTS - Yes rather than BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest selection is Over 1.5 goals, as at least 2 goals were scored in 80% of Molde’s matches and in as many as 88% of KFUM’s games. Molde are in excellent offensive form: they have averaged 4.4 goals over their last 5 matches, with an average xG of 2.18. KFUM concede an average of 2.38 goals away from home, and in 88% of their away matches, both teams combined to score over 1.5 goals. The visitors also create chances, recording 1.37 xG and 4.63 shots on target per match, while Molde allow opponents an average of 1.50 xG. Over 2.5 goals is also well supported, but Molde’s high seasonal rate of matches finishing below 2.5 goals, at 70%, makes Over 1.5 the safer and strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Molde have the clearer first-half argument: at home, they concede an average of just 0.5 goals before the break, while KFUM concede as many as 1.5 away from home. The hosts have led at half-time in 30% of their matches, while the visitors have gone into the break trailing in 50% of their away games. Molde’s advantage is reinforced by their current form, having averaged 2.2 goals before half-time and 2.2 after the interval across their last five matches. Although KFUM average 4.63 shots on target per game and have an xG of 1.37, their away defence concedes an average of 2.38 goals, with opponents recording an xG of 1.69. The most likely scenario is therefore an HT/FT 1/1 outcome, with Molde taking the lead at the break and maintaining it until the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

72Possession (%)28
MoldeKFUM
24Shots5
MoldeKFUM
6Shots on target1
MoldeKFUM
2.47xG0.56
MoldeKFUM
9Corners2
MoldeKFUM
75Dangerous attacks23
MoldeKFUM
7Fouls10
MoldeKFUM
0Cards2
MoldeKFUM

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match1.11
MoldeKFUM
1.61Goals conceded / match1.72
MoldeKFUM
59%Average possession46%
MoldeKFUM
5.61Shots on target / match4.17
MoldeKFUM

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.94Shots per match10.78
MoldeKFUM
5.61Shots on target4.17
MoldeKFUM
13.4%Shot conversion10.3%
MoldeKFUM
59%Possession46%
MoldeKFUM
1.71xG for1.26
MoldeKFUM
1.41xG against1.58
MoldeKFUM

Shooting quality

Molde: DominantKFUM: Balanced
MoldeKFUM
Accuracy (shots on target)38%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Molde is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Molde · 1.4 pts / match - KFUM

Molde
WDLWW
Season result split
50% W17% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-6
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 2.18Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
KFUM
LWWDL
Season result split
28% W22% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-9
1.06 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Molde is 80% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Molde · 1.11 goals / match - KFUM

Molde is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.61 goals / match - Molde · 1.72 goals / match - KFUM

Molde scoring profile: very strong

Molde scores in 89% of matches (16 of 18 matches), while KFUM keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 matches).

KFUM scoring profile: very strong

KFUM scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while Molde keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 matches).

36Goals scored (season)20
MoldeKFUM
29Goals conceded (season)31
MoldeKFUM
3.61Average goals in match2.83
MoldeKFUM
15Goals scored (last 5)7
MoldeKFUM
12Goals conceded (last 5)10
MoldeKFUM

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal78%
MoldeKFUM
50%2 goals33%
MoldeKFUM
33%3 goals0%
MoldeKFUM
22%4 goals0%
MoldeKFUM

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal72%
MoldeKFUM
56%2 goals61%
MoldeKFUM
17%3 goals22%
MoldeKFUM
6%4 goals17%
MoldeKFUM

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

39%BTTS at half-time39%
MoldeKFUM
11%BTTS in both halves17%
MoldeKFUM
39%Scored in both halves17%
MoldeKFUM

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
MoldeKFUM
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
MoldeKFUM
100%BTTS - last 580%
MoldeKFUM

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

89%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
MoldeKFUM
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time61%
MoldeKFUM
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
MoldeKFUM

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
MoldeKFUM
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
MoldeKFUM
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
MoldeKFUM

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Molde is 58% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / match - Molde · 1.06 pts / match - KFUM

Molde - half-time state
44% leading33% draw22% trailing
KFUM - half-time state
22% leading39% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per match (1st half)1.06
MoldeKFUM
1.06Goals scored (1st half)0.72
MoldeKFUM
0.83Goals conceded (1st half)0.94
MoldeKFUM
1.89Average goals (1st half)1.67
MoldeKFUM
44%Clean sheet before half-time39%
MoldeKFUM
28%No goal before half-time39%
MoldeKFUM

After half-time (2nd half)

1.28Points per match (2nd half)0.83
MoldeKFUM
0.94Goals scored (2nd half)0.39
MoldeKFUM
0.78Goals conceded (2nd half)0.78
MoldeKFUM
1.72Average goals (2nd half)1.17
MoldeKFUM
39%Clean sheet after half-time44%
MoldeKFUM
44%No goal after half-time67%
MoldeKFUM

Molde - second-half results

28% W44% D28% L
30
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KFUM - second-half results

11% W50% D39% L
19
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Molde - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match1.41.6
Goals conceded / match1.21.2
Average goals in match2.62.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7
KFUM - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.40
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.4
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+2-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Molde
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
4
5
16-30
10
5
31-45
10
6
46-60
1
1
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

KFUM
ScoredConceded
4
6
0-15
6
5
16-30
3
6
31-45
4
4
46-60
2
1
61-75
1
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.22
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+12%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Molde

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

KFUM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
5% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
5%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eliteserien).

Teams vs league

MoldeLigaKFUM
Average goals in match▲ 3.613.08▼ 2.83
Both teams scored▲ 72%57%• 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 67%61%▼ 56%
Clean sheets▼ 17%23%▲ 28%
Goal before half-time▲ 89%84%• 83%
Goal after half-time▲ 83%78%▼ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.08
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / match
1.30
Away goals / match
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MoldeSubstitutionOn: Mats Møller DæhliOff: Eirik Haugan
  2. KFUMYellow cardJacob Blixt Flaten
  3. KFUMYellow cardJacob Blixt Flaten
  4. KFUMSubstitutionOn: Brage TobiassenOff: Martin Tangen Vinjor
  5. MoldeSubstitutionOn: Trent Kone DohertyOff: Wolji Jalal Abdulai
  6. MoldeSubstitutionOn: Viktor Bender LarsenOff: Martin Linnes

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Molde 1 - 2 - 2 KFUM. Average goals 3.60, both teams scored in 80% matches.

KFUM
2 : 4
Molde
KFUM Fotball
0 : 0
Molde FK
Molde FK
2 : 3
KFUM Fotball
KFUM
1 : 1
Molde
Molde
2 : 3
KFUM

FAQ

What was the result of Molde vs KFUM?

The Eliteserien match finished Molde 2:0 KFUM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Molde and KFUM?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Molde won 1, KFUM won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Molde vs KFUM?

Molde score 2.00 goals per game on average and KFUM 1.11. The Eliteserien average is 3.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 72% of Molde's matches and 56% of KFUM's.

What form are Molde and KFUM in?

Over the last 5 games Molde have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and KFUM 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Molde vs KFUM?

The statistical background for Molde vs KFUM — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.