Norway - EliteserienData current as of 07 September 2026

Molde vs KFUM: match statistics

Molde crest
Molde
2 : 0half-time 0:0
KFUM crest
KFUM

Molde vs KFUM: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Molde played KFUM in Eliteserien (Norway). The match was played on 6 September 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Molde: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. KFUM: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Molde scores 1.62 and concedes 1.31 goals per match. KFUM scores 1.00 and concedes 1.62. League average: 2.95 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Molde 62%, KFUM 46%. Over 2.5: Molde 54%, KFUM 54%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

Molde has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.26. Molde: 13.4 shots per match, KFUM: 10.6.

Match halves

Molde: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 0.69. KFUM: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.38.

Goals by minute

Molde: 31-45+ (6 goals). KFUM: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Eliteserien: 2.95 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 75%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Molde have a clear home advantage: they win 67% of their home matches, score an average of 2.33 goals per game there, and lose just 22% of matches. KFUM win only 13% of their away games, concede an average of 2.38 goals per match, and have an away goal difference of -10. The hosts also create more chances, averaging 14.22 shots and an xG of 1.65, compared with 11.88 shots and an xG of 1.37 for the visitors. Both teams have won 3 of their last 5 matches, but Molde scored 22 goals during that period, while KFUM managed 9. Molde’s attacking edge and KFUM’s weak away defence point to a home win as the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is strengthened by KFUM’s very high season BTTS frequency of 75%, compared with 40% for Molde, while over the last five matches these figures stood at 60% and 80%, respectively. Molde are in excellent attacking form, averaging 4.4 goals across their last five games with an xG of 2.18, whereas KFUM have conceded as many as 2.38 goals per match on average this season. The visitors also create chances: their average xG is 1.37, they register 4.63 shots on target per match, and Molde allow opponents an xG of 1.50. The hosts keep a clean sheet in 40% of their matches, which is a significant argument against BTTS, but their last five games have produced an average of 2.0 goals conceded. Molde’s current attacking superiority and the vulnerability of both defences make a goal for each team the more likely scenario, supporting BTTS - Yes rather than BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest selection is Over 1.5 goals, as at least 2 goals were scored in 80% of Molde’s matches and in as many as 88% of KFUM’s games. Molde are in excellent offensive form: they have averaged 4.4 goals over their last 5 matches, with an average xG of 2.18. KFUM concede an average of 2.38 goals away from home, and in 88% of their away matches, both teams combined to score over 1.5 goals. The visitors also create chances, recording 1.37 xG and 4.63 shots on target per match, while Molde allow opponents an average of 1.50 xG. Over 2.5 goals is also well supported, but Molde’s high seasonal rate of matches finishing below 2.5 goals, at 70%, makes Over 1.5 the safer and strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Molde have the clearer first-half argument: at home, they concede an average of just 0.5 goals before the break, while KFUM concede as many as 1.5 away from home. The hosts have led at half-time in 30% of their matches, while the visitors have gone into the break trailing in 50% of their away games. Molde’s advantage is reinforced by their current form, having averaged 2.2 goals before half-time and 2.2 after the interval across their last five matches. Although KFUM average 4.63 shots on target per game and have an xG of 1.37, their away defence concedes an average of 2.38 goals, with opponents recording an xG of 1.69. The most likely scenario is therefore an HT/FT 1/1 outcome, with Molde taking the lead at the break and maintaining it until the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
MoldeKFUM
-1Shots-1
MoldeKFUM
-1Shots on target-1
MoldeKFUM
0xG0
MoldeKFUM
-1Corners-1
MoldeKFUM
0Dangerous attacks0
MoldeKFUM
-1Fouls-1
MoldeKFUM
-1Cards-1
MoldeKFUM

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.62Goals scored / match1
MoldeKFUM
1.31Goals conceded / match1.62
MoldeKFUM
58%Average possession47%
MoldeKFUM
4.62Shots on target / match4.15
MoldeKFUM

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.38Shots per match10.62
MoldeKFUM
4.62Shots on target4.15
MoldeKFUM
12.1%Shot conversion9.4%
MoldeKFUM
58%Possession47%
MoldeKFUM
1.53xG for1.26
MoldeKFUM
1.45xG against1.49
MoldeKFUM

Shooting quality

Molde: BalancedKFUM: Balanced
MoldeKFUM
Accuracy (shots on target)35%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Molde is 75% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Molde · 0.8 pts / match - KFUM

Molde
WLWDL
Season result split
46% W15% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-5
1.54 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
KFUM
LWDLL
Season result split
23% W23% R54% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-7
0.92 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-4
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Molde is 62% better for: goals scored per match.

1.62 goals / match - Molde · 1 goals / match - KFUM

Molde is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.31 goals / match - Molde · 1.62 goals / match - KFUM

Molde scoring profile: very strong

Molde scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while KFUM keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).

KFUM scoring profile: very strong

KFUM scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while Molde keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).

21Goals scored (season)13
MoldeKFUM
17Goals conceded (season)21
MoldeKFUM
2.92Average goals in match2.62
MoldeKFUM
7Goals scored (last 5)4
MoldeKFUM
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
MoldeKFUM

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal69%
MoldeKFUM
38%2 goals31%
MoldeKFUM
15%3 goals0%
MoldeKFUM
15%4 goals0%
MoldeKFUM

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal69%
MoldeKFUM
38%2 goals69%
MoldeKFUM
8%3 goals15%
MoldeKFUM
8%4 goals8%
MoldeKFUM

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time38%
MoldeKFUM
0%BTTS in both halves15%
MoldeKFUM
31%Scored in both halves15%
MoldeKFUM

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS46%
MoldeKFUM
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
MoldeKFUM
80%BTTS - last 540%
MoldeKFUM

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time85%
MoldeKFUM
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time62%
MoldeKFUM
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
MoldeKFUM

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time62%
MoldeKFUM
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
MoldeKFUM
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
MoldeKFUM

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Molde is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.69 pts / match - Molde · 0.85 pts / match - KFUM

Molde - half-time state
46% leading31% draw23% trailing
KFUM - half-time state
15% leading38% draw46% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.69Points per match (1st half)0.85
MoldeKFUM
0.92Goals scored (1st half)0.62
MoldeKFUM
0.69Goals conceded (1st half)1.08
MoldeKFUM
1.62Average goals (1st half)1.69
MoldeKFUM
54%Clean sheet before half-time31%
MoldeKFUM
31%No goal before half-time46%
MoldeKFUM

After half-time (2nd half)

1.23Points per match (2nd half)1
MoldeKFUM
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)0.38
MoldeKFUM
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)0.54
MoldeKFUM
1.31Average goals (2nd half)0.92
MoldeKFUM
46%Clean sheet after half-time54%
MoldeKFUM
54%No goal after half-time69%
MoldeKFUM

Molde - second-half results

31% W31% R38% P
22
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KFUM - second-half results

15% W54% R31% P
11
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Molde - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.00
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
KFUM - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.40.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Molde
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
2
2
16-30
6
3
31-45
6
3
46-60
1
1
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

KFUM
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
3
5
16-30
2
4
31-45
3
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
0
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.78
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Molde

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

KFUM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eliteserien).

Teams vs league

MoldeLigaKFUM
Average goals in match 2.922.95 2.62
Both teams scored 62%55% 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 54%57% 54%
Clean sheets 23%24% 31%
Goal before half-time 85%82% 85%
Goal after half-time 85%78% 62%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.95
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.79
Home goals / match
1.16
Away goals / match
+54%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defence advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MoldeSubstitutionOn: Mats Møller DæhliOff: Eirik Haugan
  2. KFUMYellow cardJacob Blixt Flaten
  3. KFUMYellow cardJacob Blixt Flaten
  4. KFUMSubstitutionOn: Brage TobiassenOff: Martin Tangen Vinjor
  5. MoldeSubstitutionOn: Trent Kone DohertyOff: Wolji Jalal Abdulai
  6. MoldeSubstitutionOn: Viktor Bender LarsenOff: Martin Linnes

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Molde 0 - 2 - 2 KFUM. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 75% matches.

KFUM Fotball
0 : 0
Molde FK
Molde FK
2 : 3
KFUM Fotball
KFUM
1 : 1
Molde
Molde
2 : 3
KFUM

FAQ

What was the result of Molde vs KFUM?

The Eliteserien match finished Molde 2:0 KFUM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Molde and KFUM?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Molde won 0, KFUM won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Molde vs KFUM?

Molde score 1.62 goals per game on average and KFUM 1.00. The Eliteserien average is 2.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Molde's matches and 46% of KFUM's.

What form are Molde and KFUM in?

Over the last 5 games Molde have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and KFUM 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Molde vs KFUM?

The statistical background for Molde vs KFUM — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.