Bulgaria - Second LeagueStadion OgostaData current as of 18 October 2026

Montana vs Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa: match statistics

Montana vs Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Montana played Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa in Second League (Bulgaria). The match was played on 30 August 2026. Venue: Stadion Ogosta. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Montana: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Montana scores 1.80 and concedes 1.60 goals per match. Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa scores 1.00 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.58 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Montana 80%, Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa 60%. Over 2.5: Montana 80%, Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa 40%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 42%.

xG, shots and style

Montana has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.06. Montana: 13.2 shots per match, Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa: 9.2.

Match halves

Montana: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.80. Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

Montana: 0-15 (3 goals). Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second League: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 42%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Montana have significantly stronger home numbers: they have won both of their home matches so far, scoring an average of 2 goals and conceding just 0.5 per game. The hosts also create higher-quality chances, averaging 1.81 xG compared with Lokomotiv’s 1.29 away from home, while registering 5 shots on target per match against 2 for the visitors. Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa score an average of just 1 goal away from home, and their defence allows opponents to generate 1.59 xG, which should benefit Montana’s attack. Both teams have identical records across their last five matches—2 wins, 1 draw and 2 defeats—but the hosts’ advantage is primarily based on their very solid home form. The visitors have scored in every away match, so a goal from them is a realistic possibility; however, a Montana win remains the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is strengthened by Montana’s current form: BTTS landed in 80% of their last five matches, compared with 60% in Lokomotiv’s games. During this period, Montana averaged 1.8 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, while Lokomotiv scored 1.0 and allowed opponents 1.2 goals on average. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in none of their matches this season, and their average xG against stands at 1.44, giving the visitors a realistic route to finding the net. Lokomotiv do have a 50% clean-sheet rate, but their defence allows opponents an average xG of 1.59, while Montana have recently been generating 1.63 xG. The season-long BTTS figures—67% for Montana and 50% for Lokomotiv—are at least comparable with the league average of 49%, making a goal for each team the more likely outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is the low goal ceiling: in the matches played by both teams to date, at least 4 goals have never been scored, meaning that Under 3.5 goals has landed in 100% of each team’s matches. Montana score an average of 1.0 goal, while Lokomotiv also average 1.0, with the visitors keeping a clean sheet in 50% of their matches. The xG profile points to a moderate number of chances: Montana create an average of 0.91 xG, while Lokomotiv record 1.29 xG, producing a projected total of around 2.40 goals. Montana’s last five matches have been more open, averaging 3.4 goals with Over 2.5 landing in 80% of them, but Lokomotiv recorded Over 2.5 in only 40% of such matches. Therefore, Under 3.5 has a clear edge, as even with the hosts’ recent improvement in attack, the data for both teams does not support a scenario featuring four or more goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is a draw at half-time: Montana were level at the break in all of their last five matches, with an average first-half record of 1.0 goals scored and 1.0 conceded. Lokomotiv led at half-time in 40% of their last five fixtures, but were also trailing in 40%, indicating greater volatility than the home side. After the break, the visitors have been particularly cautious, averaging just 0.4 goals scored and 0.4 conceded over their last five matches, while drawing the second half in 100% of cases. Montana have a stronger recent attacking record, averaging 1.8 goals per match compared with Lokomotiv’s 1.0, but their average xG is only 0.91, so the advantage is not sufficient to strongly favour a home win. The X/X scenario is therefore the most likely, although a half-time draw followed by a Montana win remains a close alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
7Shots3
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
4Shots on target0
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
0.9xG0.61
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
2Corners2
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
23Dangerous attacks56
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
20Fouls18
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
0Cards0
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
1.8Goals scored / match1
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
1.6Goals conceded / match1.2
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
53%Average possession46%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
5.2Shots on target / match2.2
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.2Shots per match9.2
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
5.2Shots on target2.2
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
13.6%Shot conversion10.9%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
53%Possession46%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
1.65xG for1.06
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
1.48xG against1.5
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa

Shooting quality

Montana: Efficient finishingLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa: Balanced
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
Accuracy (shots on target)39%24%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.45

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Montana
DWLWL
Season result split
40% W20% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 at home
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
DLLWW
Season result split
40% W20% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 away
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Montana is 80% better for: goals scored per match.

1.8 goals / match - Montana · 1 goals / match - Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa

Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.6 goals / match - Montana · 1.2 goals / match - Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa

Montana scoring profile: very strong

Montana scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa scoring profile: very strong

Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Montana keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

9Goals scored (season)5
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
8Goals conceded (season)6
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
3.4Average goals in match2.2
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
9Goals scored (last 5)5
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal80%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
60%2 goals20%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
20%3 goals0%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
0%4 goals0%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal80%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
60%2 goals40%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
20%3 goals0%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
0%4 goals0%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.3 of 5 matches
48%
League average

Goal patterns

80%BTTS at half-time20%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
20%BTTS in both halves0%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
40%Scored in both halves20%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa

BTTS and goal count

80%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
80%BTTS - last 560%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
80%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time40%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Montana · 1.4 pts / match - Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa

Montana - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing
Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa - half-time state
40% leading20% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.4
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
1Goals scored (1st half)0.6
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
2Average goals (1st half)1.4
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
20%Clean sheet before half-time60%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
20%No goal before half-time40%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)1
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
1.4Average goals (2nd half)0.8
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
40%Clean sheet after half-time60%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
40%No goal after half-time60%
MontanaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa

Montana - second-half results

40% W20% D40% L
5
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa - second-half results

0% W100% D0% L
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Montana - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match2.01.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 5
Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Montana
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
3
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.80
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
80%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Montana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
142%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).

Teams vs league

MontanaLigaLokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
Average goals in match▲ 3.402.58▼ 2.20
Both teams scored▲ 80%48%▲ 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 80%42%▼ 40%
Clean sheets▼ 20%29%▼ 20%
Goal before half-time▲ 80%62%▲ 80%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%77%▼ 40%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.58
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Montana vs Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa?

The Second League match finished Montana 3:0 Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Montana vs Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa?

Montana score 1.80 goals per game on average and Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa 1.00. The Second League average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Montana's matches and 60% of Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa's.

What form are Montana and Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa in?

Over the last 5 games Montana have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Montana vs Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.