Montana vs Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa: match statistics
Montana vs Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Montana played Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa in Second League (Bulgaria). The match was played on 30 August 2026. Venue: Stadion Ogosta. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Montana: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Montana scores 1.80 and concedes 1.60 goals per match. Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa scores 1.00 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.58 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Montana 80%, Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa 60%. Over 2.5: Montana 80%, Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa 40%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 42%.
xG, shots and style
Montana has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.06. Montana: 13.2 shots per match, Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa: 9.2.
Match halves
Montana: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.80. Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.40.
Goals by minute
Montana: 0-15 (3 goals). Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second League: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 42%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Montana have significantly stronger home numbers: they have won both of their home matches so far, scoring an average of 2 goals and conceding just 0.5 per game. The hosts also create higher-quality chances, averaging 1.81 xG compared with Lokomotiv’s 1.29 away from home, while registering 5 shots on target per match against 2 for the visitors. Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa score an average of just 1 goal away from home, and their defence allows opponents to generate 1.59 xG, which should benefit Montana’s attack. Both teams have identical records across their last five matches—2 wins, 1 draw and 2 defeats—but the hosts’ advantage is primarily based on their very solid home form. The visitors have scored in every away match, so a goal from them is a realistic possibility; however, a Montana win remains the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for both teams to score is strengthened by Montana’s current form: BTTS landed in 80% of their last five matches, compared with 60% in Lokomotiv’s games. During this period, Montana averaged 1.8 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, while Lokomotiv scored 1.0 and allowed opponents 1.2 goals on average. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in none of their matches this season, and their average xG against stands at 1.44, giving the visitors a realistic route to finding the net. Lokomotiv do have a 50% clean-sheet rate, but their defence allows opponents an average xG of 1.59, while Montana have recently been generating 1.63 xG. The season-long BTTS figures—67% for Montana and 50% for Lokomotiv—are at least comparable with the league average of 49%, making a goal for each team the more likely outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is the low goal ceiling: in the matches played by both teams to date, at least 4 goals have never been scored, meaning that Under 3.5 goals has landed in 100% of each team’s matches. Montana score an average of 1.0 goal, while Lokomotiv also average 1.0, with the visitors keeping a clean sheet in 50% of their matches. The xG profile points to a moderate number of chances: Montana create an average of 0.91 xG, while Lokomotiv record 1.29 xG, producing a projected total of around 2.40 goals. Montana’s last five matches have been more open, averaging 3.4 goals with Over 2.5 landing in 80% of them, but Lokomotiv recorded Over 2.5 in only 40% of such matches. Therefore, Under 3.5 has a clear edge, as even with the hosts’ recent improvement in attack, the data for both teams does not support a scenario featuring four or more goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is a draw at half-time: Montana were level at the break in all of their last five matches, with an average first-half record of 1.0 goals scored and 1.0 conceded. Lokomotiv led at half-time in 40% of their last five fixtures, but were also trailing in 40%, indicating greater volatility than the home side. After the break, the visitors have been particularly cautious, averaging just 0.4 goals scored and 0.4 conceded over their last five matches, while drawing the second half in 100% of cases. Montana have a stronger recent attacking record, averaging 1.8 goals per match compared with Lokomotiv’s 1.0, but their average xG is only 0.91, so the advantage is not sufficient to strongly favour a home win. The X/X scenario is therefore the most likely, although a half-time draw followed by a Montana win remains a close alternative.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Montana | Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 24% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.45 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Montana is 80% better for: goals scored per match.
1.8 goals / match - Montana · 1 goals / match - Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.6 goals / match - Montana · 1.2 goals / match - Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
Montana scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).
Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Montana keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Montana
Over / Under - Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Montana · 1.4 pts / match - Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Montana - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Montana
Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).
Teams vs league
| Montana | Liga | Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.40 | 2.58 | ▼ 2.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 80% | 48% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 80% | 42% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 29% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 62% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 77% | ▼ 40% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Montana vs Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa?
The Second League match finished Montana 3:0 Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Montana vs Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa?
Montana score 1.80 goals per game on average and Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa 1.00. The Second League average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Montana's matches and 60% of Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa's.
What form are Montana and Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa in?
Over the last 5 games Montana have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Montana vs Lokomotiv G. Oryahovitsa?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


