Montana vs Vihren Sandanski: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Montana vs Vihren Sandanski: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Montana play Vihren Sandanski in Second League (Bulgaria). The match date is 8 September 2026. Venue: Stadion Ogosta.
Current form
Montana: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Vihren Sandanski: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Montana scores 1.71 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. Vihren Sandanski scores 2.14 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.57 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Montana 57%, Vihren Sandanski 71%. Over 2.5: Montana 71%, Vihren Sandanski 43%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 43%.
xG, shots and style
Vihren Sandanski has higher xG: 1.79 vs 1.49. Montana: 11.7 shots per match, Vihren Sandanski: 14.9.
Match halves
Montana: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.86. Vihren Sandanski: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 1.43.
Goals by minute
Montana: 0-15 (4 goals). Vihren Sandanski: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second League: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 43%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Montana | Vihren Sandanski | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Vihren Sandanski is 57% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Montana · 2.2 pts / match - Vihren Sandanski
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Vihren Sandanski is 25% better for: goals scored per match.
1.71 goals / match - Montana · 2.14 goals / match - Vihren Sandanski
Vihren Sandanski is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.14 goals / match - Montana · 1 goals / match - Vihren Sandanski
Montana scores in 86% of matches (6 of 7 matches), while Vihren Sandanski keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).
Vihren Sandanski scores in 100% of matches (7 of 7 matches), while Montana keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Montana
Over / Under - Vihren Sandanski
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Vihren Sandanski is 66% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.29 pts / match - Montana · 2.14 pts / match - Vihren Sandanski
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Montana - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Vihren Sandanski - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Montana
Vihren Sandanski
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).
Teams vs league
| Montana | Liga | Vihren Sandanski | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.86 | 2.57 | ▲ 3.14 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 57% | 46% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 71% | 43% | • 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 30% | • 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 63% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 77% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
When do Montana and Vihren Sandanski play?
Montana face Vihren Sandanski on 8 September 2026 in Second League at Stadion Ogosta. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What do the goal statistics show before Montana vs Vihren Sandanski?
Montana score 1.71 goals per game on average and Vihren Sandanski 2.14. The Second League average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Montana's matches and 71% of Vihren Sandanski's.
What form are Montana and Vihren Sandanski in?
Over the last 5 games Montana have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Vihren Sandanski 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Montana vs Vihren Sandanski?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.