Montpellier vs Grenoble Foot 38: match statistics
Montpellier vs Grenoble Foot 38: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Montpellier played Grenoble Foot 38 in Ligue 2 (France). The match was played on 17 April 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Montpellier: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Grenoble Foot 38: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Montpellier scores 1.17 and concedes 0.90 goals per match. Grenoble Foot 38 scores 0.97 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.45 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Montpellier 37%, Grenoble Foot 38 57%. Over 2.5: Montpellier 27%, Grenoble Foot 38 40%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
Montpellier has higher xG: 1.26 vs 1.23. Montpellier: 11.3 shots per match, Grenoble Foot 38: 10.3.
Match halves
Montpellier: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.73. Grenoble Foot 38: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Montpellier: 76-90+ (12 goals). Grenoble Foot 38: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligue 2: 2.45 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Montpellier appears to be the favorite: they sit 7th in the table versus Grenoble’s 13th and have scored 35 goals this season compared to the visitors’ 29. At home Montpellier averages 1.6 goals, has an average xG of 1.45 and attempts 13.27 shots per match (4.6 on target), while Grenoble away average is 1.13 goals, xG 1.21 and 10.07 shots (4.13 on target). Defensively the hosts also perform better — Montpellier concedes 1.13 goals on average at home and has 33% clean sheets, whereas Grenoble concedes 1.53 goals away and has only 7% clean sheets; average xG against is 1.3 versus 1.81 for the guests. The form gap is clear: Montpellier collects 1.8 points in the last 5 matches and scored 7 goals in that period, while Grenoble only 0.6 points and 5 goals. Based on these numbers I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I assess BTTS probability at 40% (Yes) and 60% (No), therefore I recommend 'No' as the more likely outcome. The strongest argument against BTTS is Montpellier’s defense: 47% of matches this season are clean sheets, and the home side conceded only 2 goals in the last 5 matches (0.4 per game). Grenoble has a high season BTTS rate of 67% and 60% in the last 5 matches with an average of 1.13 goals scored this season (1.0 in the last 5), which increases their chance to score. Still, Montpellier generates xG 1.25 with an actual goals average of 0.8 this season (suggesting home inefficiency), while Grenoble concedes xG against 1.81 and loses on average 1.4 in the last 5 matches, which does not offset the high clean sheet rate of the hosts. In summary, weighing season BTTS 47% vs 67% and recent 20% vs 60%, I lean toward the scenario that at least one team will not score — I assign this a 60% probability.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and opponent defensive analysis yields expected goals of 1.53 for Montpellier (xG for 1.25 vs. Grenoble conceded 1.81) and 1.30 for Grenoble (xG for 1.21 vs. Montpellier conceded 1.38), totaling 2.83 goals. With an average λ=2.83 the Poisson distribution indicates approximately a 77% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~54% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and ~31% for minimum 4 goals (Over 3.5). Season data confirm a propensity for goals: Grenoble have 67% of matches over 1.5 goals and 47% over 2.5, Montpellier 53% and 33% respectively, versus a league average of 46% for Over 2.5. In the last 5 matches Montpellier scored 7 and conceded 2 (avg 1.4 and 0.4), Grenoble scored 5 and conceded 7 (1.0 and 1.4), so despite the home side’s solid defense the signal for Over 1.5 is the strongest and is the recommended selection.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a draw at Full-Time (X/X) — I assigned it 36%. Montpellier were level at the break in 67% of home matches and kept a clean sheet at half-time in 87% of fixtures with an average first-half goals of 0.4 (scoredAVGHT_home 0.4), which strongly favors a low-scoring first half. Grenoble average 0.53 goals in the first half (scoredAVGHT_away 0.53) and their matches more frequently feature a goal before the break (seasonOver05PercentageHT_away 73%), but the away side only win 13% of trips and lose 53% (winPercentage_away 13.0, losePercentage_away 53.0), and they have no victories in their last five away outings (last5_winPercentage_overall_away 0.0). Over the full match Montpellier draw 60% of home games and win 27% (drawPercentage_home 60.0, winPercentage_home 27.0); additionally the home xG is 1.25 versus 1.21 for the visitors, and the home xG conceded is 1.38 versus 1.81 for the away team, all of which points to a tight, low-scoring affair and maintaining the draw. A less likely alternative is a draw at Half-Time and a Montpellier turnaround to win (X/1 17%), given the hosts’ better recent form over the last five matches (last5_winPercentage_overall_home 40.0, form_l5_home "wwddd").
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Montpellier | Grenoble Foot 38 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Montpellier is 200% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Montpellier · 0.6 pts / match - Grenoble Foot 38
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Montpellier is 21% better for: goals scored per match.
1.17 goals / match - Montpellier · 0.97 goals / match - Grenoble Foot 38
Montpellier is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.9 goals / match - Montpellier · 1.2 goals / match - Grenoble Foot 38
Montpellier scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Grenoble Foot 38 keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 matches).
Grenoble Foot 38 scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Montpellier keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Montpellier
Over / Under - Grenoble Foot 38
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Grenoble Foot 38 is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / match - Montpellier · 1.4 pts / match - Grenoble Foot 38
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Montpellier - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Grenoble Foot 38 - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Montpellier
Grenoble Foot 38
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 2).
Teams vs league
| Montpellier | Liga | Grenoble Foot 38 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.07 | 2.45 | ▼ 2.17 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 37% | 50% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 27% | 46% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 37% | 31% | ▼ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 65% | ▼ 53% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 63% | 71% | • 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Montpellier 0 - 1 - 0 Grenoble Foot 38. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Montpellier vs Grenoble Foot 38?
The Ligue 2 match finished Montpellier 2:1 Grenoble Foot 38. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Montpellier vs Grenoble Foot 38?
Montpellier score 1.17 goals per game on average and Grenoble Foot 38 0.97. The Ligue 2 average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Montpellier's matches and 57% of Grenoble Foot 38's.
What form are Montpellier and Grenoble Foot 38 in?
Over the last 5 games Montpellier have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Grenoble Foot 38 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Montpellier vs Grenoble Foot 38?
The statistical background for Montpellier vs Grenoble Foot 38 — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


