United States - MLSData current as of 07 September 2026

Montreal Impact vs Orlando City: match statistics

Montreal Impact crest
Montreal Impact
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Orlando City crest
Orlando City

Montreal Impact vs Orlando City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Montreal Impact played Orlando City in MLS (United States). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Montreal Impact: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Orlando City: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Montreal Impact scores 1.40 and concedes 2.30 goals per match. Orlando City scores 1.45 and concedes 2.91. League average: 3.20 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Montreal Impact 50%, Orlando City 64%. Over 2.5: Montreal Impact 90%, Orlando City 82%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Montreal Impact has higher xG: 1.27 vs 1.25. Montreal Impact: 11.0 shots per match, Orlando City: 11.0.

Match halves

Montreal Impact: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.40. Orlando City: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.82.

Goals by minute

Montreal Impact: 0-15 (4 goals). Orlando City: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.20 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Prediction: Montreal to win (1). At home the hosts average 2.0 goals scored and only 1.0 conceded per match, with an average of 5 shots on target and a 25% conversion rate; in their last 5 matches they have scored 12 goals (2.4 per game). Orlando away concedes an average of 3.83 goals per match, has 0% clean sheets and in 50% of away games leaves without scoring, which significantly weakens their chances despite 14 goals in the last 5 fixtures (2.8 avg.). In terms of quality of chances Montreal’s home xG for is 1.08 with xG against 1.11, while Orlando away has xG for 1.05 and xG against 2.08, indicating the hosts are better at limiting clear opportunities for opponents. Therefore I estimate the probability of a home win at 65%, draw 20% and away win 15%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Montreal has BTTS - Yes in 80% of home matches this season, while Orlando has BTTS - Yes in 50% of matches this season versus the league average of 57%, indicating a tilt toward both teams scoring. Montreal scores 1.8 and concedes 1.8 at home on average, while Orlando concedes as many as 3.83 goals per game this season, giving the hosts a realistic chance to score. Despite a season scoring average of 1.17, Orlando has averaged 2.8 goals in the last 5 matches with BTTS - Yes in 80% of those games, and Montreal has averaged 2.4 goals with BTTS - Yes in 60% of their last 5, showing both teams have recently been regularly finding the net. xG also supports goal expectancy: Montreal generates xG 1.49 at home, Orlando allows opponents xG 2.08, while Orlando has xG 1.05 and Montreal concedes xG 1.95, so both sides create chances. Additionally, both teams have 0% clean sheets this season and the league averages 3.18 goals per match; therefore I back BTTS - Yes with an estimated probability of 75% vs 25% for No Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Seasonal indicators show a strong goals trend: Over 2.5 goals occurred in 80% of Montreal’s matches and 83% of Orlando’s matches (average 81.5%), and in the last 5 meetings both teams registered Over 2.5 in 80% of cases. Calculated xG (as the average of own attacking xG and opponent-allowed xG) yields Montreal 1.79 xG (1.49 xG attack vs 2.08 xG against) and Orlando 1.50 xG (1.05 xG attack vs 1.95 xG against), total ~3.29 expected goals. Montreal averages 14.0 shots with 5.2 on target, Orlando 8.5 shots with 3.83 on target, and shot conversion rates of 13% and 14%, which supports both sides’ goal potential. Both-teams-to-score rates are 80% for Montreal and 50% for Orlando (average 65%), increasing the likelihood of exchanged goals and exceeding 2.5 goals. Based on this, the top signal is Over 2.5 (over) with an estimated probability of ~82% and an expected total score of ~3.29 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

At half-time the statistics clearly favour Montreal: the home side average 1.0 goals by half-time versus Orlando’s 0.33, while the visitors concede an average of 2.33 goals before the break. Orlando were leading at the break in only 17% of matches and were trailing at half-time in 83% of their away appearances, whereas Montreal led at the break in 40% of their games, which strongly increases the hosts’ chance to hold a lead after 45 minutes. Over the full match Montreal also show superior offensive metrics (1.8 goals per home game and xG 1.49 versus Orlando’s xG 1.05), and Orlando concede on average 3.83 goals per game, so maintaining or extending a lead is realistic. Additionally the hosts average 14.0 shots and 5.2 on target compared to the visitors’ 8.5 and 3.83, and 80% of Montreal’s matches have a goal before half-time, all supporting a scenario of the hosts leading and winning. On this basis I assign the highest probability to the 1/1 scenario (Montreal leading at half-time and winning), with the next strongest signal being X/1 (draw at half-time and Montreal win).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
23Shots8
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
5Shots on target3
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
2.24xG0.99
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
11Corners3
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
63Dangerous attacks37
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
10Fouls16
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
0Cards2
Montreal ImpactOrlando City

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Montreal ImpactOrlando City
1.4Goals scored / match1.45
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
2.3Goals conceded / match2.91
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
47%Average possession44%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
4.5Shots on target / match4.45
Montreal ImpactOrlando City

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11Shots per match11
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
4.5Shots on target4.45
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
12.7%Shot conversion13.2%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
47%Possession44%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
1.27xG for1.25
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
1.44xG against2.02
Montreal ImpactOrlando City

Shooting quality

Montreal Impact: Counter-attackingOrlando City: Counter-attacking
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
Accuracy (shots on target)41%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Orlando City is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Montreal Impact · 1.4 pts / match - Orlando City

Montreal Impact
LLWWL
Season result split
30% W0% R70% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-7
0.90 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
LWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Orlando City
DLWLW
Season result split
27% W9% R64% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-7
0.91 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-4
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 2.10BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Montreal Impact is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.3 goals / match - Montreal Impact · 2.91 goals / match - Orlando City

Montreal Impact scoring profile: very strong

Montreal Impact scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while Orlando City keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 11 matches).

Orlando City scoring profile: strong

Orlando City scores in 64% of matches (7 of 11 matches), while Montreal Impact keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 matches).

14Goals scored (season)16
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
23Goals conceded (season)32
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
3.7Average goals in match4.36
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
7Goals scored (last 5)11
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
9Goals conceded (last 5)9
Montreal ImpactOrlando City

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal64%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
30%2 goals45%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
30%3 goals18%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
10%4 goals18%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal100%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
70%2 goals64%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
50%3 goals55%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
20%4 goals36%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time27%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
10%BTTS in both halves0%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
30%Scored in both halves18%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS55%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
40%Min. 3 goals without BTTS27%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
60%BTTS - last 580%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time91%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
60%Min. 2 goals before half-time73%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
30%Min. 3 goals before half-time36%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time91%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time45%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Montreal Impact is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Montreal Impact · 1 pts / match - Orlando City

Montreal Impact - half-time state
50% leading0% draw50% trailing
Orlando City - half-time state
27% leading18% draw55% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
1Goals scored (1st half)0.64
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
0.9Goals conceded (1st half)1.64
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
1.9Average goals (1st half)2.27
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
40%Clean sheet before half-time27%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
30%No goal before half-time55%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City

After half-time (2nd half)

0.8Points per match (2nd half)1
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.82
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
1.4Goals conceded (2nd half)1.27
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
1.8Average goals (2nd half)2.09
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
30%Clean sheet after half-time36%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City
70%No goal after half-time64%
Montreal ImpactOrlando City

Montreal Impact - second-half results

20% W20% R60% P
15
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding60%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 30%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Orlando City - second-half results

27% W18% R55% P
11
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Montreal Impact - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.61.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+2-4
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Orlando City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.61.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.62.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Montreal Impact
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
3
2
16-30
3
5
31-45
1
6
46-60
2
1
61-75
1
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Orlando City
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
4
7
16-30
2
6
31-45
2
5
46-60
3
3
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.03
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.2 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
126%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Montreal Impact

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.73
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.86
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
178%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.6
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

Orlando City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.77
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.69
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.89
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
152%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Montreal ImpactLigaOrlando City
Average goals in match 3.703.20 4.36
Both teams scored 50%58% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 90%61% 82%
Clean sheets 20%24% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%73% 91%
Goal after half-time 80%78% 91%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.20
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.91
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+48%
Home attack advantage
+32%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Orlando CityYellow cardEduard Andrés Atuesta Velasco
  2. Orlando CitySubstitutionOn: Duncan McGuireOff: Tyrese Spicer
  3. Montreal ImpactSubstitutionOn: Noah StreitOff: Iván Jaime Pajuelo
  4. Orlando CitySubstitutionOn: David BrekaloOff: Justin Ellis
  5. Montreal ImpactSubstitutionOn: Daniel Armando Ríos CalderónOff: Prince-Osei Owusu
  6. Montreal ImpactSubstitutionOn: Olger EscobarOff: Samuel Piette
  7. Orlando CitySubstitutionOn: Zakaria TaifiOff: Griffin Dorsey
  8. Orlando CityYellow cardIago Teodoro da Silva Nogueira

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Marcos de OliveiraMatches officiated: 8
3Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 263%Home wins25%Draws13%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Montreal Impact 0 - 0 - 1 Orlando City. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Montreal Impact vs Orlando City?

The MLS match finished Montreal Impact 2:0 Orlando City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Montreal Impact vs Orlando City?

Montreal Impact score 1.40 goals per game on average and Orlando City 1.45. The MLS average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Montreal Impact's matches and 64% of Orlando City's.

What form are Montreal Impact and Orlando City in?

Over the last 5 games Montreal Impact have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Orlando City 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Montreal Impact vs Orlando City?

The statistical background for Montreal Impact vs Orlando City — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.