Montreal Impact vs Portland Timbers: match statistics
Montreal Impact vs Portland Timbers: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Montreal Impact played Portland Timbers in MLS (United States). The match was played on 13 May 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Montreal Impact: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Portland Timbers: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Montreal Impact scores 1.45 and concedes 2.09 goals per match. Portland Timbers scores 1.73 and concedes 1.91. League average: 3.20 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Montreal Impact 45%, Portland Timbers 64%. Over 2.5: Montreal Impact 82%, Portland Timbers 64%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 61%.
xG, shots and style
Montreal Impact has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.32. Montreal Impact: 12.1 shots per match, Portland Timbers: 11.4.
Match halves
Montreal Impact: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.55. Portland Timbers: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.64.
Goals by minute
Montreal Impact: 0-15 (4 goals). Portland Timbers: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS: 3.20 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 61%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back a Montreal win (1). At home the hosts score an average of 2.0 goals per game and have 0% matches without scoring, while Portland averages only 1.0 goal away and has 50% of away games without a goal. Defensively Montreal concedes 0.75 goals on average at the stadium and has 50% clean sheets, whereas the visitors concede 2.17 goals on the road and have recorded no clean sheets away from home. Montreal generates 1.37 xG at home with 5 shots on target and a 17% conversion rate, while Portland posts 1.32 xG, 4 shots on target and an 8% conversion rate away, indicating higher efficiency from the hosts. Given Montreal’s 4 wins in their last 5 matches and 2.4 average points over the last 5 versus Portland’s 3 wins and 1.8 points, I assign a 70% probability to a home win, 18% to a draw and 12% to an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I assess BTTS - Yes as more likely: Montreal has a seasonal BTTS rate of 80% versus Portland’s 50%, giving a simple average of 65% and above the league average of 59%. Both teams have defensive issues — Montreal concedes 1.6 goals per game and Portland 2.17, with xG against of 1.84 (Montreal) and 2.25 (Portland), so both sides present opponents with scoring opportunities. Offensively Montreal scores 2.6 goals per season with an xG of 1.32 and a very high conversion rate of 25%, while Portland has 1.0 goals with xG 1.32 and only 8% conversion, although in the last 5 matches Portland scored 10 goals (2.0 per game) and Montreal 13 goals (2.6 per game), which maintains the risk of goals from both sides. However, note the short-term decline in BTTS — the last 5 matches for both teams show BTTS at 40%, which reduces confidence, but the fact that Montreal had over 2.5 goals in 80% of matches and Portland has no clean sheets (0%) argues for goals from both sides. Overall I give BTTS 70% vs 30% and recommend 'Yes' as the best pick due to Montreal’s seasonal 80% BTTS, the high number of chances created (xG against 1.84 and 2.25) and the league scoring pace of 3.21 goals.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project approximately 3.16 total goals in this match: Montreal 1.78, Portland 1.38, indicating a game with multiple goals. Montreal at home averages 2.6 goals per season, attempts 10.6 shots and has a high conversion rate of 25%, with an xG of 1.66 in the last 5 matches (13 goals in the last 5), demonstrating offensive strength. Portland away concedes on average 2.17 goals and has an xG against of 1.88 in the last 5 matches, while scoring only 1.0 goals away with an 8% conversion — this points to Portland’s defensive vulnerability combined with limited attacking efficiency. Season-to-date both teams have 100% of matches over 1.5 goals; Over 2.5 occurs for Montreal in 80% of matches and for Portland in 50% (last 5: 60%), and the league average is 3.21 goals per match — together these reinforce the signal for Over 2.5. Therefore I recommend Over 2.5 as the best line: the expected 3.16 goals and the above percentages give my assessed probability of about 66% for Over 2.5 (Over 1.5 is practically certain at ~98%, while Over 3.5 has a smaller margin at ~38%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Montreal led at half-time in 3 of their last 5 matches (60%) and average 1.6 goals in the first half, while Portland record only 0.67 goals by the break. The home side win 60% of matches at home and average 2.0 points per home game, whereas the visitors have a 17% win rate and just 0.5 points per away match, with 83% of away games ending in losses. Both teams have an attacking xG of 1.32, but Portland concedes 2.25 opponent xG compared to Montreal’s 1.84, and the hosts convert chances more efficiently (25% versus 8% shot conversion), which increases the likelihood of them holding a lead at the break. Season-to-date both teams have had at least one goal by half-time in 100% of matches, and Portland have been behind at half-time in 50% of games, further favoring Montreal to be leading at the interval. Based on this I select HT/FT 1/1 as the strongest signal (44%), with the secondary scenarios X/1 (17%) and X/X (8%) being less likely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Montreal Impact | Portland Timbers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Portland Timbers is 19% better for: goals scored per match.
1.45 goals / match - Montreal Impact · 1.73 goals / match - Portland Timbers
Portland Timbers is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.09 goals / match - Montreal Impact · 1.91 goals / match - Portland Timbers
Montreal Impact scores in 73% of matches (8 of 11 matches), while Portland Timbers keeps a clean sheet in 9% (1 of 11 matches).
Portland Timbers scores in 73% of matches (8 of 11 matches), while Montreal Impact keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Montreal Impact
Over / Under - Portland Timbers
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Montreal Impact is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.45 pts / match - Montreal Impact · 1.36 pts / match - Portland Timbers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Montreal Impact - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 36%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Portland Timbers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Montreal Impact
Portland Timbers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| Montreal Impact | Liga | Portland Timbers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.55 | 3.20 | ▲ 3.64 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 45% | 59% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 82% | 61% | ▲ 64% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 27% | 23% | ▼ 9% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 91% | 74% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 79% | ▲ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Montreal Impact vs Portland Timbers?
The MLS match finished Montreal Impact 2:2 Portland Timbers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Montreal Impact vs Portland Timbers?
Montreal Impact score 1.45 goals per game on average and Portland Timbers 1.73. The MLS average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Montreal Impact's matches and 64% of Portland Timbers's.
What form are Montreal Impact and Portland Timbers in?
Over the last 5 games Montreal Impact have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Portland Timbers 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Montreal Impact vs Portland Timbers?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


