Montreal Impact vs Portland Timbers: match statistics
Montreal Impact vs Portland Timbers: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Montreal Impact play Portland Timbers in MLS (United States). The match date is 14 May 2026 at 01:30. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Montreal Impact: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Portland Timbers: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Montreal Impact scores 1.38 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Portland Timbers scores 1.81 and concedes 1.94. League average: 3.30 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Montreal Impact 44%, Portland Timbers 69%. Over 2.5: Montreal Impact 69%, Portland Timbers 69%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 63%.
xG, shots and style
Portland Timbers has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.48. Montreal Impact: 13.4 shots per match, Portland Timbers: 12.9.
Match halves
Montreal Impact: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.56. Portland Timbers: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.88.
Goals by minute
Montreal Impact: 0-15 (5 goals). Portland Timbers: 16-30 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS: 3.30 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 63%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
I back a Montreal win (1). At home the hosts score an average of 2.0 goals per game and have 0% matches without scoring, while Portland averages only 1.0 goal away and has 50% of away games without a goal. Defensively Montreal concedes 0.75 goals on average at the stadium and has 50% clean sheets, whereas the visitors concede 2.17 goals on the road and have recorded no clean sheets away from home. Montreal generates 1.37 xG at home with 5 shots on target and a 17% conversion rate, while Portland posts 1.32 xG, 4 shots on target and an 8% conversion rate away, indicating higher efficiency from the hosts. Given Montreal’s 4 wins in their last 5 matches and 2.4 average points over the last 5 versus Portland’s 3 wins and 1.8 points, I assign a 70% probability to a home win, 18% to a draw and 12% to an away win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Montreal Impact | Portland Timbers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Portland Timbers is 67% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Montreal Impact · 1 pts / match - Portland Timbers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Portland Timbers is 31% better for: goals scored per match.
1.38 goals / match - Montreal Impact · 1.81 goals / match - Portland Timbers
Montreal Impact scores in 63% of matches (10 of 16 matches), while Portland Timbers keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 16 matches).
Portland Timbers scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while Montreal Impact keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Montreal Impact
Over / Under — Portland Timbers
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Montreal Impact is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.31 pts / match - Montreal Impact · 1.13 pts / match - Portland Timbers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Montreal Impact - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Portland Timbers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Montreal Impact
Portland Timbers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| Montreal Impact | Liga | Portland Timbers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.38 | 3.30 | ▲ 3.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 62% | ▲ 69% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 69% | 63% | ▲ 69% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 25% | 21% | ▼ 6% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 77% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | • 81% | 81% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Montreal Impact vs Portland Timbers?
The MLS match finished Montreal Impact 2:2 Portland Timbers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Montreal Impact vs Portland Timbers?
Montreal Impact score 1.38 goals per game on average and Portland Timbers 1.81. The MLS average is 3.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Montreal Impact's matches and 69% of Portland Timbers's.
What form are Montreal Impact and Portland Timbers in?
Over the last 5 games Montreal Impact have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Portland Timbers 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Montreal Impact vs Portland Timbers?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.