Norway - First DivisionData current as of 12 September 2026

Moss vs Bryne: match statistics

Moss crest
Moss
2 : 3half-time 0:3
Bryne crest
Bryne

Moss vs Bryne: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Moss played Bryne in First Division (Norway). The match was played on 10 May 2026. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

Moss: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Bryne: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Moss scores 1.40 and concedes 1.80 goals per match. Bryne scores 1.20 and concedes 2.40. League average: 3.43 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Moss 60%, Bryne 60%. Over 2.5: Moss 80%, Bryne 80%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 73%.

xG, shots and style

Moss has higher xG: 1.79 vs 1.63. Moss: 15.2 shots per match, Bryne: 14.0.

Match halves

Moss: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.20. Bryne: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

Moss: 76-90+ (3 goals). Bryne: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division: 3.43 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 73%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistics clearly favor the hosts: Moss score on average 1.5 goals at home and concede only 0.5 per match, with an average xG of 1.72, while Bryne average 0.0 goals away and concede 2.0 on average. The hosts create more chances — on average 15 shots of which 5.5 are on target and a 10% conversion rate at home — whereas the visitors average 9.5 shots and 3 on target with zero conversion away, which lowers their real scoring chances (xG 1.72 vs 1.24). Form confirms the advantage: Moss have scored 7 goals in the last 5 matches and average 1.8 points per match, while Bryne have 6 goals in five matches, conceded 12 and average only 0.2 points per match (4 losses and 1 draw). Additionally Moss have kept a clean sheet in 50% of home games, while Bryne have no clean sheets away, which together with the difference in mean goals (1.5 vs 0.0) and mean goals conceded (0.5 vs 2.0) provides a strong argument for a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The 'BTTS - Yes' scenario appears more likely, so I assign it a 70% probability. Moss has a seasonal home BTTS rate of 100% and averages 2.0 goals scored vs 2.67 conceded per match, while Bryne has a 60% BTTS rate in their last 5 matches and concedes an average of 2.4 goals across those five fixtures. Both teams generate comparable xG over their last five matches (Moss 1.74 xG vs Bryne 1.58 xG) and both record conceded xG around 1.5 (1.51 vs 1.42), which indicates both chance creation and chance allowance. Additionally, the league averages 3.43 goals per match, Moss averages 17 shots and 4.67 on target versus Bryne’s 9.5/3.0, and both teams have 0% clean sheets this season, all of which increase the likelihood of goals from both sides. Based on these concrete figures, the 'Yes' scenario is a stronger signal than 'No'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate a total of 3.06 goals in the match: Moss 1.71 and Bryne 1.35. Calculation is based on xG: Moss xG_for 1.89 versus Bryne xG_against 1.52 (average 1.71), and Bryne xG_for 1.24 versus Moss xG_against 1.46 (average 1.35). Moss generates more chances (17.0 shots and 4.67 shots on target with a 12% conversion) than Bryne (9.5 shots, 3.0 on target and 0% conversion in the data), which increases expected goals for the home side. Historically over 2.5 is strong: Moss has 100% of matches >2.5 this season, Bryne 50%, and the last 5 matches for both teams show 80% of games >2.5; the league averages 3.43 goals per game and 73% of matches >2.5. Therefore I select Over 2.5 goals as the strongest signal (approx. 78%): the 3.06 goals forecast and Moss’s record (100% >2.5) provide an edge, while Over 3.5 is more uncertain (approx. 45%) due to the divergence Moss 67% vs Bryne 0% for >3.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I back HT/FT 1/1 — Moss leading at the break and winning the match, because they were leading at halftime in 67% of their games. Bryne did not lead at halftime in any match and were trailing at the break in 100% of cases, and their season away goals average is 0.0, which significantly limits their comeback potential. Moss has a clear advantage in chance creation: xG 1.89 versus Bryne’s 1.24, averaging 17.0 shots and 4.67 shots on target compared to 9.5 and 3.0 for the opponent, which increases the likelihood of maintaining the lead. Form corroborates this — Moss are 'wwlwl' with a 60% win rate while Bryne are 'lllld' with a 0% win rate in their last five, so the most likely scenario is 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 3
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

69Possession (%)31
MossBryne
14Shots10
MossBryne
3Shots on target7
MossBryne
1.43xG1.29
MossBryne
11Corners3
MossBryne
47Dangerous attacks23
MossBryne
7Fouls17
MossBryne
1Cards2
MossBryne

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.4Goals scored / match1.2
MossBryne
1.8Goals conceded / match2.4
MossBryne
47%Average possession48%
MossBryne
5.8Shots on target / match4
MossBryne

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.2Shots per match14
MossBryne
5.8Shots on target4
MossBryne
9.2%Shot conversion8.6%
MossBryne
47%Possession48%
MossBryne
1.79xG for1.63
MossBryne
1.57xG against1.48
MossBryne

Shooting quality

Moss: AttackingBryne: Attacking
MossBryne
Accuracy (shots on target)38%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Moss is 800% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Moss · 0.2 pts / match - Bryne

Moss
WWLWL
Season result split
60% W0% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 at home
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Bryne
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W20% D80% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Moss is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

1.4 goals / match - Moss · 1.2 goals / match - Bryne

Moss is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.8 goals / match - Moss · 2.4 goals / match - Bryne

Moss scoring profile: very strong

Moss scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Bryne keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).

Bryne scoring profile: strong

Bryne scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Moss keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

7Goals scored (season)6
MossBryne
9Goals conceded (season)12
MossBryne
3.2Average goals in match3.6
MossBryne
7Goals scored (last 5)6
MossBryne
9Goals conceded (last 5)12
MossBryne

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal60%
MossBryne
40%2 goals40%
MossBryne
20%3 goals20%
MossBryne
0%4 goals0%
MossBryne

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal100%
MossBryne
60%2 goals80%
MossBryne
20%3 goals60%
MossBryne
20%4 goals0%
MossBryne

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
MossBryne
0%BTTS in both halves0%
MossBryne
0%Scored in both halves20%
MossBryne

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
MossBryne
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
MossBryne
60%BTTS - last 560%
MossBryne

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
MossBryne
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
MossBryne
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
MossBryne

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
MossBryne
80%Min. 2 goals after half-time80%
MossBryne
60%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
MossBryne

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Bryne is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Moss · 1.2 pts / match - Bryne

Moss - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing
Bryne - half-time state
40% leading0% draw60% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.2
MossBryne
0.2Goals scored (1st half)0.4
MossBryne
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
MossBryne
0.8Average goals (1st half)1.2
MossBryne
60%Clean sheet before half-time40%
MossBryne
80%No goal before half-time60%
MossBryne

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)0.8
MossBryne
1.2Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
MossBryne
1.2Goals conceded (2nd half)1.6
MossBryne
2.4Average goals (2nd half)2.4
MossBryne
20%Clean sheet after half-time20%
MossBryne
40%No goal after half-time60%
MossBryne

Moss - second-half results

40% W20% D40% L
5
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Bryne - second-half results

20% W20% D60% L
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Moss - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Bryne - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.6
Average goals in match1.22.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Moss
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
1
4
46-60
2
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Bryne
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
3
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
3
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.40
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Moss

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.62
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

Bryne

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.92
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
121%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

MossLigaBryne
Average goals in match 3.203.43 3.60
Both teams scored 60%55% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 80%73% 80%
Clean sheets 20%23% 0%
Goal before half-time 60%80% 100%
Goal after half-time 80%85% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.43
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.98
Home goals / match
1.45
Away goals / match
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+25%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MossSubstitutionOn: Robert MarcusOff: Jamiu Musbaudeen
  2. BryneSubstitutionOn: Kristoffer HayOff: Martin Åmot Lye
  3. MossYellow cardWilliam Strand Kvale
  4. BryneYellow cardAnders Molund
  5. MossSubstitutionOn: Wilmer OlofssonOff: Marius Cassidy
  6. BryneYellow cardMagnus Rugland Ree
  7. MossGoalOscar Aga

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Moss vs Bryne?

The First Division match finished Moss 2:3 Bryne. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Moss vs Bryne?

Moss score 1.40 goals per game on average and Bryne 1.20. The First Division average is 3.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Moss's matches and 60% of Bryne's.

What form are Moss and Bryne in?

Over the last 5 games Moss have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Bryne 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Moss vs Bryne?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Moss vs Bryne: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.