Norway - First DivisionMelløs StadionData current as of 15 October 2026

Moss vs Egersund: match statistics

Moss crest
Moss
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Egersund crest
Egersund

Moss vs Egersund: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Moss played Egersund in First Division (Norway). The match was played on 14 October 2026. Venue: Melløs Stadion. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Moss: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Egersund: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Moss scores 1.60 and concedes 2.20 goals per match. Egersund scores 1.56 and concedes 2.00. League average: 3.85 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Moss 84%, Egersund 52%. Over 2.5: Moss 88%, Egersund 72%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 72%.

xG, shots and style

Moss has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.41. Moss: 12.8 shots per match, Egersund: 11.3.

Match halves

Moss: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.96. Egersund: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.76.

Goals by minute

Moss: 76-90+ (10 goals). Egersund: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division: 3.85 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 72%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-3. Average goals 3.67, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Moss have a slight edge heading into this match, although they have won only 17% of their home games, as Egersund have lost as many as 67% of their away matches. The hosts create chances at home with an average xG of 1.63, while the visitors’ away xG stands at 1.29; Moss also average more shots on target per match, 4.92 compared with 3.67. Both teams score an average of 1.42 goals in these conditions, but Egersund’s defence concedes as many as 2.75 goals per away match, more than Moss do at home (2.17). In their last five matches, Moss scored 7 goals and collected 7 points, while Egersund netted 5 times and earned 5 points. However, the hosts’ defensive frailties and the fact that they have won only 17% of their home games limit confidence in a Moss victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

In the last five matches involving the two teams, both sides scored in 80% of games, a strong signal in favour of BTTS - Yes. Moss conceded an average of 2.0 goals during this period, while Egersund conceded 2.6, meaning both defences are giving opponents opportunities to score. Moss average 1.58 goals at home, while Egersund concede 2.75 away from home; the visitors, meanwhile, score an average of 1.42 goals on the road, against an average of 1.33 goals conceded by the hosts at home. Caution is warranted given Moss's season BTTS rate of just 33%, compared with Egersund's 67%. However, both teams' current attacking and defensive form suggests that this time, both sides will find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is for Over 1.5 goals: this line has been cleared in 75% of Moss matches and in every Egersund match covered by the statistics. The visitors concede an average of 2.75 goals per match, which, combined with Moss’s average of 1.58 goals scored, increases the likelihood of the hosts finding the net several times. Egersund, in turn, average 1.42 goals, although Moss have kept a clean sheet in 42% of their matches, making the visitors’ contribution to the total less certain. Across their last five matches, the teams conceded 2.0 and 2.6 goals per game respectively, while Over 2.5 goals landed in 60% of their matches. Therefore, with a projected total of 3.50 goals, Over 1.5 goals offers a clearer edge than the more demanding 2.5-goal line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Moss led at the break in 6 of 12 matches, while Egersund were trailing at half-time in 8 of 12, making a home lead at half-time the most likely individual scenario. The pre-break goal difference supports this: Moss scored an average of 1.0 goals, while Egersund conceded 1.5. The home side also have a clear advantage over the full match, averaging 1.75 points per game compared with their opponents’ 0.67, while Egersund conceded 2.75 goals per match. However, caution is warranted: Moss were trailing at half-time in 4 of their last 5 matches, while Egersund led at the break in 3, increasing the possibility of a turnaround after half-time. Despite this recent change in form, Moss’s season-long first-half advantage combined with their stronger full-time results points primarily to the hosts leading both at half-time and at full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
MossEgersund
10Shots14
MossEgersund
1Shots on target0
MossEgersund
1.08xG1.32
MossEgersund
8Corners9
MossEgersund
52Dangerous attacks61
MossEgersund
-1Fouls-1
MossEgersund
-1Cards-1
MossEgersund

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.6Goals scored / match1.56
MossEgersund
2.2Goals conceded / match2
MossEgersund
49%Average possession51%
MossEgersund
4.92Shots on target / match4.04
MossEgersund

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.8Shots per match11.32
MossEgersund
4.92Shots on target4.04
MossEgersund
12.5%Shot conversion13.8%
MossEgersund
49%Possession51%
MossEgersund
1.57xG for1.41
MossEgersund
1.66xG against1.5
MossEgersund

Shooting quality

Moss: BalancedEgersund: Efficient finishing
MossEgersund
Accuracy (shots on target)38%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Moss is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Moss · 1 pts / match - Egersund

Moss
WLWLW
Season result split
32% W16% D52% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-13
1.12 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-4-6
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
DDLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Egersund
DDLLW
Season result split
36% W20% D44% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-11
1.28 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-8
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Egersund is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.2 goals / match - Moss · 2 goals / match - Egersund

Moss scoring profile: very strong

Moss scores in 88% of matches (22 of 25 matches), while Egersund keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 matches).

Egersund scoring profile: very strong

Egersund scores in 76% of matches (19 of 25 matches), while Moss keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 25 matches).

40Goals scored (season)39
MossEgersund
55Goals conceded (season)50
MossEgersund
3.8Average goals in match3.56
MossEgersund
8Goals scored (last 5)6
MossEgersund
10Goals conceded (last 5)13
MossEgersund

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal76%
MossEgersund
48%2 goals48%
MossEgersund
20%3 goals24%
MossEgersund
4%4 goals4%
MossEgersund

How often they concede at least...

96%1 goal72%
MossEgersund
80%2 goals52%
MossEgersund
32%3 goals40%
MossEgersund
12%4 goals24%
MossEgersund

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

36%BTTS at half-time16%
MossEgersund
8%BTTS in both halves12%
MossEgersund
24%Scored in both halves32%
MossEgersund

BTTS and goal count

80%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
MossEgersund
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS28%
MossEgersund
80%BTTS - last 580%
MossEgersund

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

84%Min. 1 goal before half-time84%
MossEgersund
56%Min. 2 goals before half-time60%
MossEgersund
32%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
MossEgersund

2nd half

92%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
MossEgersund
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
MossEgersund
28%Min. 3 goals after half-time28%
MossEgersund

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Egersund is 59% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.88 pts / match - Moss · 1.4 pts / match - Egersund

Moss - half-time state
20% leading28% draw52% trailing
Egersund - half-time state
40% leading20% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.88Points per match (1st half)1.4
MossEgersund
0.64Goals scored (1st half)0.8
MossEgersund
1.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.92
MossEgersund
1.84Average goals (1st half)1.72
MossEgersund
28%Clean sheet before half-time52%
MossEgersund
52%No goal before half-time48%
MossEgersund

After half-time (2nd half)

1.28Points per match (2nd half)1.2
MossEgersund
0.96Goals scored (2nd half)0.76
MossEgersund
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.08
MossEgersund
1.96Average goals (2nd half)1.84
MossEgersund
32%Clean sheet after half-time32%
MossEgersund
36%No goal after half-time44%
MossEgersund

Moss - second-half results

36% W20% D44% L
22
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding160%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Egersund - second-half results

28% W36% D36% L
35
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding90%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 36%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Moss - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match2.01.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Egersund - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.20
Goals scored / match1.00.2
Goals conceded / match1.01.6
Average goals in match2.01.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference0-7
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Moss
ScoredConceded
5
7
0-15
5
11
16-30
6
12
31-45
8
8
46-60
6
8
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Egersund
ScoredConceded
5
7
0-15
5
6
16-30
10
10
31-45
8
9
46-60
4
5
61-75
7
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.68
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
68%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
0%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Moss

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.68
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Egersund

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

MossLigaEgersund
Average goals in match• 3.803.85▼ 3.56
Both teams scored▲ 84%65%▼ 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 88%72%• 72%
Clean sheets▼ 4%18%▲ 28%
Goal before half-time▲ 84%78%▲ 84%
Goal after half-time▲ 92%90%▼ 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.85
Average goals per match
65%
Both teams scored
72%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
18%
Clean sheets
2.15
Home goals / match
1.70
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
10%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
90%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
17%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. EgersundSubstitutionOn: Hinrik HarðarsonOff: Nicolaj Tornvig Hansen
  2. MossSubstitutionOn: Robin Johansen HermanstadOff: Moussa Njie
  3. MossSubstitutionOn: Momodou Lion NjieOff: Jamiu Musbaudeen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Moss 0 - 0 - 3 Egersund. Average goals 3.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Egersund
3 : 0
Moss
Egersunds IK
2 : 0
Moss FK
Moss FK
2 : 4
Egersunds IK

FAQ

What was the result of Moss vs Egersund?

The First Division match finished Moss 0:0 Egersund. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Moss and Egersund?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Moss won 0, Egersund won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Moss vs Egersund?

Moss score 1.60 goals per game on average and Egersund 1.56. The First Division average is 3.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 72% of games. Both teams score in 84% of Moss's matches and 52% of Egersund's.

What form are Moss and Egersund in?

Over the last 5 games Moss have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Egersund 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Moss vs Egersund?

The statistical background for Moss vs Egersund — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.